ESA and supporting info

I have the last report here and it lists a lot of evidence used, past reports as well. I wonder if it is necessary to copy all this stuff again and send it all or just the report will do as it refers to it. It is a lot of stuff to send again.

For example this is the kind of thing it says.

In risk category (the paragraph about being in it)

Justification of advice-

Evidence considered- the Med 3, consultant letter, specialist letter, copy of prescription, care plan and hospital correspondence, and reports from 2008, 2010 and 2014.

The Med 3, ESA50 and medical evidence indicates there would be substantial risk... because of ...(states MH condition)


So,what do you think, would this being listed be enough or have to send it all again. Or just anything more recent which they haven;t seen already. Thanks.

I just noticed it says with PIP to include other benefit letters as it may help them, whereas with ESA it tells you not to! Very intriguing (and inconsistent).

Ok. It seems they have done the same in the past as the previous ESA Report was similar, just the older ones add more stuff on there each time.

I think I will enclose the most recent report, refer to the stuff on there, add in new stuff I have and outline how I still meet the risk category on the form.

I'm sorry of it is a bad example, but it is simply the medical report they did about me, the previous ones have been just the same kind of thing with a few words different or different examples of evidence, so not much i can really do about that.

It might be because they always seem to do paper assessments. Not sure. I read, there is a pre-board check with people in the SG, where they look and see if the criteria still apply, so the info I am giving may help with this, at this stage, you see. as it has in the past.