× Members

DLA over retirement age

  • Plum Howard
  • Topic Author
13 years 4 months ago #40848 by Plum Howard
DLA over retirement age was created by Plum Howard
What is the position of DLA reform to people over retirment age as it is people of working age who seem to be getting targeted.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pete17971
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #40849 by pete17971
Replied by pete17971 on topic Re:DLA over retirement age
Plum Howard wrote:

What is the position of DLA reform to people over retirment age as it is people of working age who seem to be getting targeted.


Hi,

As you are probably aware, currently if one receives DLA prior to age 65, then providing they remain eligible needs wise, then they can continue to receive it.

'New claims' from those aged over 65 are not permitted (one can claim Attendance Allowance if one has care needs post age 65).

The government have indicated that those DLA recipients 'of working age' will be 'retested' from circa 2013/14. Proposals are also ongoing regarding changing DLA to the new 'PIP' allowance.

Pete
Last edit: 13 years 4 months ago by pete17971. Reason: spelling

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • originaldave
13 years 4 months ago #40874 by originaldave
Replied by originaldave on topic Re:DLA over retirement age
pete17971 wrote:

Plum Howard wrote:

What is the position of DLA reform to people over retirment age as it is people of working age who seem to be getting targeted.


Hi,

As you are probably aware, currently if one receives DLA prior to age 65, then providing they remain eligible needs wise, then they can continue to receive it.

'New claims' from those aged over 65 are not permitted (one can claim Attendance Allowance if one has care needs post age 65).

The government have indicated that those DLA recipients 'of working age' will be 'retested' from circa 2013/14. Proposals are also ongoing regarding changing DLA to the new 'PIP' allowance.

Pete


I thought I saw on one of the DWP pages they are "starting" with people of working age.

My gut feeling is they will deal with people over 65 in a way that if they move onto new system they cant take mobility with move. and before anyone says they cant do that, they are doing that to people in care homes/nursing homes.

The spin will be if people on AA cant have mobility when should others keep it?

the move will give them the chance to do that :(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pete17971
13 years 4 months ago #40884 by pete17971
Replied by pete17971 on topic Re:DLA over retirement age
Dave wrote:

pete17971 wrote:

Plum Howard wrote:

What is the position of DLA reform to people over retirment age as it is people of working age who seem to be getting targeted.


Hi,

As you are probably aware, currently if one receives DLA prior to age 65, then providing they remain eligible needs wise, then they can continue to receive it.

'New claims' from those aged over 65 are not permitted (one can claim Attendance Allowance if one has care needs post age 65).

The government have indicated that those DLA recipients 'of working age' will be 'retested' from circa 2013/14. Proposals are also ongoing regarding changing DLA to the new 'PIP' allowance.

Pete


I thought I saw on one of the DWP pages they are "starting" with people of working age.

My gut feeling is they will deal with people over 65 in a way that if they move onto new system they cant take mobility with move. and before anyone says they cant do that, they are doing that to people in care homes/nursing homes.

The spin will be if people on AA cant have mobility when should others keep it?

the move will give them the chance to do that :(


Hi Dave,

All the government have announced is the 'restesting' of DLA claimants of working age commencing in 2013.

If the DWP are saying they 'will start with people of working age' they are somewhat putting the cart before of the horse as nothing has yet been announced by the government with regard to the restesting of non working age DLA claimants.

Of course once the consultation regarding 'PIP' is done with and if it is passed into legislation then the 'landscape' may change again.

Pete

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • originaldave
13 years 4 months ago #40891 by originaldave
Replied by originaldave on topic Re:DLA over retirement age
pete17971 wrote:

Dave wrote:

pete17971 wrote:

Plum Howard wrote:

What is the position of DLA reform to people over retirment age as it is people of working age who seem to be getting targeted.


Hi,

As you are probably aware, currently if one receives DLA prior to age 65, then providing they remain eligible needs wise, then they can continue to receive it.

'New claims' from those aged over 65 are not permitted (one can claim Attendance Allowance if one has care needs post age 65).

The government have indicated that those DLA recipients 'of working age' will be 'retested' from circa 2013/14. Proposals are also ongoing regarding changing DLA to the new 'PIP' allowance.

Pete


I thought I saw on one of the DWP pages they are "starting" with people of working age.

My gut feeling is they will deal with people over 65 in a way that if they move onto new system they cant take mobility with move. and before anyone says they cant do that, they are doing that to people in care homes/nursing homes.

The spin will be if people on AA cant have mobility when should others keep it?

the move will give them the chance to do that :(


Hi Dave,

All the government have announced is the 'restesting' of DLA claimants of working age commencing in 2013.

If the DWP are saying they 'will start with people of working age' they are somewhat putting the cart before of the horse as nothing has yet been announced by the government with regard to the restesting of non working age DLA claimants.

Of course once the consultation regarding 'PIP' is done with and if it is passed into legislation then the 'landscape' may change again.

Pete


the details of starting with working age dla claims was in the 2010 treasury document the big red document

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pete17971
13 years 4 months ago #40893 by pete17971
Replied by pete17971 on topic Re:DLA over retirement age
Dave wrote:

pete17971 wrote:

Dave wrote:

pete17971 wrote:

Plum Howard wrote:

What is the position of DLA reform to people over retirment age as it is people of working age who seem to be getting targeted.


Hi,

As you are probably aware, currently if one receives DLA prior to age 65, then providing they remain eligible needs wise, then they can continue to receive it.

'New claims' from those aged over 65 are not permitted (one can claim Attendance Allowance if one has care needs post age 65).

The government have indicated that those DLA recipients 'of working age' will be 'retested' from circa 2013/14. Proposals are also ongoing regarding changing DLA to the new 'PIP' allowance.

Pete


I thought I saw on one of the DWP pages they are "starting" with people of working age.

My gut feeling is they will deal with people over 65 in a way that if they move onto new system they cant take mobility with move. and before anyone says they cant do that, they are doing that to people in care homes/nursing homes.

The spin will be if people on AA cant have mobility when should others keep it?

the move will give them the chance to do that :(


Hi Dave,

All the government have announced is the 'restesting' of DLA claimants of working age commencing in 2013.

If the DWP are saying they 'will start with people of working age' they are somewhat putting the cart before of the horse as nothing has yet been announced by the government with regard to the restesting of non working age DLA claimants.

Of course once the consultation regarding 'PIP' is done with and if it is passed into legislation then the 'landscape' may change again.

Pete


the details of starting with working age dla claims was in the 2010 treasury document the big red document


Thanks Dave,

That point I admit must have slipped passed me. Am probably getting a bit old in remembering all that was included in the Spending Review Doc.

Pete

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.