Sign Up For Our Free ESA, PIP and DLA Updates

Email
Name
 
With 140,000 subscribers our fortnightly bulletin is the UK's leading source of benefits news. Get the facts about what's changing, how it affects you and how to prepare.  Get your free subscription now.

Professional Members

We support both claimants and professionals.  These are just some of the organisations who have subscribed to Benefits and Work:

  • Royal College of Nursing
  • Spinal Injuries Association
  • Chesterfield Law Centre
  • Stephenson’s Solicitors
  • Birmingham Citizens Advice Bureau
  • Manchester City Council Sensory Provision Team

Read more

Government ‘manipulated’ DLA figures to try to justify cuts members only)

The government has been accused by MPs of “manipulating” its own benefit statistics in a bid to justify scrapping working-age disability living allowance (DLA).

 

{EMBOT SUBSCRIPTION=5,6}The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) claimed that the number of DLA claimants was increasing, but neglected to point out that working-age recipients have actually been falling.

On Monday – the same day that Channel 4 aired a Dispatches investigation into the reforms – DWP released a “statistical update”, which it said showed the number of successful claimants of DLA had risen by 15,000 between February and May 2012.

But analysis of DWP figures by Disability News Service (DNS) has shown that the rise in claimants is due to increases in the number of children and older people receiving DLA, while the number of claimants aged 16-64 actually fell by more than 1,600.

This is important because the reforms and cuts will only affect working-age claimants, with DLA for that group to be gradually replaced by the new personal independence payment (PIP) from April.  

Stephen Lloyd, the disabled Liberal Democrat MP, who has previously criticised the coalition for “pandering to the Daily Mail” – after it published a misleading press release about the results of its “fitness for work” tests –  said he was “extremely angry at this sleight of hand by the DWP”.

He is to write to Esther McVey, the Conservative minister for disabled people, to highlight his concerns about her department’s “massaging of the stats”.

Anne McGuire, Labour’s shadow minister for disabled people, said it was “yet another example of the DWP manipulating the figures on DLA to suit their agenda of abolishing DLA”. 

She said: “I find it astonishing that it was not made clear that the number of working age applicants are falling, and can only conclude that this did not suit their agenda. 

“The DWP have form in creating impressions rather than dealing with the real facts.  Transparency surely means that you should not need to be a qualified statistician to get to the truth. 

“The DWP ministers and its press office have been found guilty yet again of trying to pull the wool over the public’s eyes by its failure to be clear what exactly the statistics show.”

DWP used its new figures to persuade two right-wing newspapers to run stories claiming that the rise in DLA claimants proved the need for reform.

The Sun newspaper claimed the number of DLA claimants was “soaring” at the rate of “one every ten minutes”, and that ministers believed the figures “proved they are right to scrap DLA from April” and replace it with the “tough” new PIP.

The Daily Mail claimed that a new DLA claimant was “signing on” every nine minutes, and that “the rush to secure the state payout is thought to be because its replacement will have tougher eligibility tests”.

Both the Sun and the Mail published their stories as – and probably before – DWP released the statistics to other media, with the Mail even having time to commission a cartoon to illustrate its article.

McVey claimed – in a statement accompanying the figures – that DLA was an “outdated benefit” and that the government’s welfare reforms were about “ensuring the billions we spend on disability benefits give more targeted support to those who need it most”.

But Lloyd said: “Someone [at DWP] fed their, frankly, misleading line to the Sun and the Daily Mail and I doubt whether either of those papers have sufficient interest in getting to the actual truth over disability issues to do the proper research with the figures to see they’d been spun.”

A DWP spokeswoman said: “Given the interest in this reform, and to be transparent, we decided to publish a web story on Monday highlighting the top-line figures, with a link for anyone who would wish to investigate the data further.”

She claimed the figures were made “publicly available” four days before the DWP press release was issued.

But when asked why the press release did not make it clear that the number of working-age DLA claimants had fallen, the spokeswoman said these statistics were available to “anyone who wants to dig down into those figures”.

A link in the press release transfers the reader to DWP’s “statistical tabulation tool”, which allows a researcher to search the entire benefits database and produce “bespoke” tables of figures.

The DWP spokeswoman said: “I have done nothing more than be open and transparent. We always talk about the overall caseload. That is what we have done. I have put a press release on the website in the interests of transparency.”

When DNS questioned how the Mail and the Sun knew in advance about the figures, she said: “I am sorry but I am not going to give you a blow-by-blow description of who the press office deals with.”

And when asked why the DWP press office was not being open and transparent about when it told the Mail and the Sun about the figures, she said: “I am not giving you a running commentary.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Comments  

#9 PaulR 2013-03-13 20:26
Quote:
I joined this group thinking it stood up for all sorts of disabilities
but l am sadly dissapointed , people with learning disabilities never seem to get a mention.
Hi Lily
I don't know how old your sons are, but in the Under 16 age group, there are 147,200 claimants with Learning Difficulties. It is the largest group of claimants in that age group. Of those, only 17,040 are in receipt of higher rate mobility. [ http://83.244.183.180/100pc/dla/disabled_new/ccmobpay/ccclient/a_carate_r_disabled_new_c_ccmobpay_p_ccclient_under_16_may12.html ]

Most get the lower rate or no money at all for mobility, so hopefully the PIP questionnaire will help your sons in this.

The guides to filling in the forms that you can download from this site are excellent and have helped myself and many others get the benefits they are entitled to. sometimes it is a fight with appeals etc., but persistence pays off!!

My wife and I look after one of our 12 grandchildren full-time and he has profound learning difficulties. You are not alone here!
All the best, Paul
#8 rollinthunder 2013-03-13 08:26
If we are talking figures why is it that the fact that esa has caused 10600 people to die in 2011 is not being levelled at the government and that7100 were actually placed in the support group these are figures from dwp and atos 4 obtained by wearesparticus
#7 lilyb 2013-03-13 07:02
I joined this group thinking it stood up for all sorts of disabilities
but l am sadly dissapointed , people with learning disabilities never seem to get a mention.
+1 #6 lilyb 2013-03-13 06:58
at least pip seems to have it right when it comes to people with learning dissabilitties, my 3 sons, who all have downs syndrome , have never been awarded the higher rate of mobility allowance, yet the pip at least has the question 'can they plan a journeye etc., l found dispatches very one sided it was all about the people who may lose the higher rate mobility..... what about the people who should get it and dont (learning dissabilities) l certainly dont think that dispatches was wrong yes the people in question should not loose the allowancebut when will anyone stand up for people like my sons .
+4 #5 highlydistressed 2013-03-05 23:45
First ESA and now PIP. Figure manipulation to ally the press with government propaganda. What chance do we have, and do the general public care? They never got the WCA correct, it is still not correct, and the same will apply to PIP. Humans are gradually being overlooked in this society, targeted by incompetent leaders whose only concern is money. And look at the state of affairs the country is in. Poor.
+3 #4 Fish 2013-03-04 21:18
I find it sad that any "doctor" would put their reputation on the line and continue with the governments dirty work , but , as always, money talks in this country.
There is more discussion in other countries about the welfare state being destroyed , but people are being kept in the dark in this country about the truth.
Paul.
+2 #3 PaulR 2013-03-04 17:58
I've just spent the best part of a day looking at the statistics for DLA, using the DWP Statistical 'tabtool' [ at http://83.244.183.180/100pc/dla_ent/tabtool_dla_ent.html ] and it extremely interesting to discover that the figures given to the press, etc., are indeed incorrect.

The figures quoted in the media and by politicians are those for the total 'number of claimants' - or 'caseload', and do not include [or exclude!] the number of claimants who receive NO AWARD.

Nor do the quoted figures only specify the number of working-age claimants, who, after all, are the only ones to be affected under the new rules for PIP.

Curiouser and curiouser.
Cheers
PAUL
+3 #2 annken 2013-03-04 16:33
PIP should be suspended I agree they havent got ESA right yet by a long way. The new person, taking over from Harriton wants to start with all the mistakes made by DWP causing stress and hardship to claiments.
+11 #1 Blue Peter 2013-03-03 20:12
Does that then mean that parliament was misled with false figures? If so, then surely PIP should be suspended, don't hold your breath!
Regards
Peter

You need to be logged in to comment