PIP mobility

I am almost certainly about to make a mandatory recnsideration request. I had a preety fair assessment and got standard rate daily living missing out by one point on enhanced but I got just 4 points for mobility (prompting) but no physical points. I have lower limb issues which are biomechanical and cause pain when I walk . Now I have told them that on occasion and with lots of rests I can do up to a mile but that I usually experience severe discomfort within 200 metres I have been under podiatry for a few years and they occasion ally reassess and remake insoles. They havediagnosed with with mechanical pain dur to pathmechanical issues. The assessor said I can manage the distance of 200 metres as I managed to sqaut and was seen doing 30 metres at the centre,. The decision letter says as I have no medication and can do up toi a mile on occasion that I cmanage 200 metres.
Am I battinga sticky wicket arguin g a lack of mdication is not relevant and that sporadic pereformanxces of a mile in sengments with rests does not mean I do not have pain before 200 metres ?

Thank you Gordan

I appreciate the difficulty of the position, thank you for emphasizing the potential issue there. It makes me wonder whether I could ever succed with it and whether that is worth me arguing at all. However as regards mobility activity 1 e ( difficulties planning/following journeys) I used to get LR mobility uinder DLA for many years on basis of panic in unfamiliar places
Am I right in thinking that the statutory instrument active from March takes away the possibioluity of 10 points for 1e or is it feasible to argue that (if they agree this problem is demonstrated (that of the planning/following) the claim bein g made before the statutory instrument the law as applied by the UT at the end of last year/eary this year) should be applied ? Presumably they would say it DOES NOT and in such event a trib unal would have to decide. Presumably B and W have not encountered anyone gettoing these points since that change ?

Thank you Gordan. They gave me 4 points for prompting . But the evidence was it seems accepted that I have one walking route, a quiet farm lane close to home a couple of times a week . I hope that does not compare to open unfamiliar routes ?
I'm half tempted to keep my head down and stay with the standard daily living but over 15 years of LR mobility makes me think its worth a shot

I think I got it wrong, I mean the 8 point descriptor in relation to unfamiliar routes (overhwheleming distress) I am sure that was removed by the statutory instrument and so the issue woiukld be not only is the evidence of those issues accepted but is a claim pre statutory uinstrument change considered on its merits or are they likely to apply the change restospectively