× Members

PIP MS,Patient DWP backed down pre Tribunal!?

More
6 years 8 months ago #194829 by Keith
I could go on and on with dates, assessments, phone calls made, re considerations(3times) and the 3 consecutive and confusing letter that followed each other, but fair to say whatever was tried and twisted they've given my hubby Keith the enhanced rate for an ongoing period....whatever that means?!

Strangely enough the 3 extra points he did need to get to the 14 living component were add ons to exsisting points and not new points to those that were awarded 0? This I will never understand because if I add up what I thought he should of been awarded just for the living, I come up with 24 and those are across the board not isolated to one or two components of the questionnaire?

Without going into the whys and wherefores, it's been a bit of a hard slog and a case of holding my nerve despite the shadowy threats from the DWP. I say I, as Keith's wife who has carried the torch for him in attempt to protect him from all the stress and worry that would bring on another very unwanted episode affecting his health. Thankyou too, to this wonderful site and forum who pointed me in the right direction and gave me the balls to fight on. Thanks in no small part to David at the Burton-upon Trent CAB who spent 2 hours early with me compiling the tribunal application, of which I the end was not needed but then again I think it was because just the application was enough to send us the DWP letter that was dated 2 weeks ago and what I think had been held onto......just in case.

So don't give up, fight on, it's such a great feeling to win!

PS. Can someone explain to me what an "ongoing period" is or will mean to us and the DWP?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
6 years 8 months ago #194851 by Gordon
Keith's wife

Congratulations on getting the original Decision revised.

An on-going award is as close as PIP gets to an indefinite award, what this means in reality we will have to wait and see as PIP has only been in operation for four years, but I would certainly not expect him to be reassessed for at least ten years and it may be much longer.,

Gordon

tags: @RESUL @PIP @MR

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.