× Members

No updating of PIP2 forms, with changes of law ?

More
6 years 6 months ago #199756 by Mike_R
Hi All,

Have been 'slogging' on, attempting to complete and return a PIP2 form.

Noticed (eventually !) that the descriptors/options on the form received DON'T match those in the PIP test by BW. It would seem the received form ( - marked PIP2 April 2013) has NEVER (?) been updated to reflect changes of the law.

Essentially therefore, the PIP2 form received FAILS to match the current LAWFUL assessment criteria - and, by what CLEARLY seems to be A LOOONNNG way !

The tick-box options on the received form number to only 23, whereas they are WELL over 60 on BW PIP self-test ( - which thankfully does seem to accommodate subsequent changes in the law, judging by the info in BW's PIP guide).

If the above is CORRECT ( - as seems to be the case), then surely the PIP assessment process is FLAWED in LAW, greatly PREJUDICING applications by INCORRECT, out of date information the out-of-date PIP2 form is prompting ( - even if 'HPs' and 'DMs' have more correct, up-to-date assessment criteria !) ! ! !

Having checked the official Gov site, the specimen PIP2 from there, with a date of October 2016, looks the same as the one received, of 'April 2013'. BW info. states the changes to PIP law were made by Govrmnt in March 2017 ( - at least for the mobility component; others may have occurred earlier and since ?).

Specimen at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/upl...affects-you-form.PDF

The 'information booklet' - copy/specimen also at Gov site - is equally POOR and OUT-OF-DATE too !

I'll be interested to know if this matter has been already discussed in a previous thread - and if so, on which one(s).

Best wishes,
M_R

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
6 years 6 months ago #199768 by Gordon
Mike

I'm afraid you are expecting too much from the form :)

It is some paper with words on it, it is at best a précis of the PIP Descriptors which are defined in the PIP legislation.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mike_R

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
6 years 6 months ago #199770 by Hayley
It's really bugging me how my partner's PIP assessment report from July (applied in May) states the "Going Out" descriptors without the change in March to preclude "Psychological distress" and it's using the old ones. Indeed, my PIP2 form sent in September asks me to tell them if I need help from someone planning or following a route because I "need reassurance" when that doesn't apply anymore. It makes me think it's not actually precluded when in fact, it is. Very deceitful but then, what's new from DWP?
:dry: ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
6 years 6 months ago #199781 by Gordon

Hayley wrote: It's really bugging me how my partner's PIP assessment report from July (applied in May) states the "Going Out" descriptors without the change in March to preclude "Psychological distress" and it's using the old ones. Indeed, my PIP2 form sent in September asks me to tell them if I need help from someone planning or following a route because I "need reassurance" when that doesn't apply anymore. It makes me think it's not actually precluded when in fact, it is. Very deceitful but then, what's new from DWP?
:dry: ;)


The DWP's position is that their original guidance for the Going Out activity did not allow points to be scored due psychological distress, for the three tasks that were subsequently changed by the updated legislation, so there is no need to update the PIP2.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
6 years 6 months ago #199790 by Mike_R
Thanks Gordon,

So, I guess it'll have to suffice to just go ahead and use the MOST appropriate of the 60+ 'descriptors' or options that do apply - even though only 23 appear on the form (?).

I've ALSO been advised by the DWP (since earlier post) that there is NO revised PIP2 form ( - which I do find most 'odd' or, in fact down right UNJUST !). Guess its now better to just ACCEPT that, and complete the (erroneous) form, . . . . and see what happens.

This w/could have been SO damaging without having gleaned this important info., . . . . . largely brought about by doing the PIP self-test !

Hopefully, all (?) HPs are now aware of all 60+ descriptors ( - at least in principle !).

Mike

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
6 years 6 months ago #199793 by Gordon
Mike

You appear to be confusing the questions on the PIP2 that related to the PIP activities with the Descriptors that make up those activities. :)

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.