× Members

lost 9 points because i went on holiday!!!!!!!!!!!

More
12 years 8 months ago - 12 years 8 months ago #62539 by Derek4
peterth125 wrote:

Thanks everyone for responding.I was assessed under the new rules as my medical was only on June 20th 2011.It all seems to be happening really quickly.I sent in my GL 24 July 7th to appeal along with a supporting letter from my GP which actually referred to the descriptors and when I received my bundle today (July 21st) it states that I provided no new medical evidence so the decision was not revised.I do not fly every day so do not understand the importance the decision maker has attached to it especially as aeroplane seats have headrests which help support my neck.Anyway I am starting to calm down now after the initial anger on reading the report and will just await a date for a tribunal hearing.Thanks again
Peter

Hi Peter

[deleted comment; misunderstood OP's post]

I gathered since my previous post that it must be the new WCA as the old WCA was a 6 or 15 point descriptor.

I must say that they have dealt with your appeal at lightning speed. It usually takes more than two months from sending the GL24 to receiving the appeal bundle.

Good luck

Derek
Last edit: 12 years 8 months ago by Derek4.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
12 years 8 months ago #62542 by bro58
Derek4 wrote:

bro58 wrote:

Derek4 wrote:

I think there are many approaches to challenging what appears to be a ridiculous and narrow-minded decision by a DM.

Reasonable regularity is one. But if the DM simply stated that the OP has come back from Spain without explaining why he overruled the ADA who examined the appellant and saw him sitting at the medical, he may have a very weak case.

There doesn't seem to be much point in being assessed my a medically trained and qualified person when a DM and overturn advice to such flimsy facts.

Good luck Peter.


Good advice Derek,

But can you please repeat the second and third lines of your last paragraph, without laughing !!!

"a medically trained and qualified person" did he/she work for ATOS.

I suppose it's turning the tables a bit, using an ATOS HCP's opinion against the DM.

Most ironic, LOL.

Disregarding my comic interlude very helpful to the OP.

cheers

bro58

Hi Bro58

It looks like you got your own back on me today, I should have remembered Wednesday's post before typing that. :)

Atos ADAs are medically trained and qualified - to a certain standard. There are also highly skilled at what they do - which isn't much.

It is a very interesting appeal where unusually, instead of the DWP supporting the medical evidence that they commissioned by 'an independent healthcare professionals with expertise in disability, an expert in their field and no interest in the outcome of the claim', they will have to disagree with it!

Regards

Derek



Derek,

Could you please retype that first line again, in two inch bold capitals.


I intend to frame this post, for future reference.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha !!!!!!!!!

just getting my breath back !!!!

cheers

bro58

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: bro58GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.