× Members

trouble with appeal

  • roz
  • Topic Author
12 years 4 months ago #76156 by roz
trouble with appeal was created by roz
i have recently won my appeal for esa. went from 12 points from assessment to 6 points at review, when dm removed 6 continence points because he failed to read atos medical report correctly, to 21 points at appeal, they reinstated those 6 points and gave me 15 points for standing instead of 6 points. great news u may think. alas no because same dm who removed 6 continence points has decided to write for statement of reasons with a view to appeal to upper tribunal. i am thoroughly depressed and don't think i can face any more of this torture. if they decide to appeal can i just start again with new esa claim or do i have to see it through to upper tribunal appeal. why have they decided to do this? i would welcome any comments and wonder if anyone else has had this happen after a successful appeal.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pete17971
12 years 4 months ago - 12 years 4 months ago #76158 by pete17971
Replied by pete17971 on topic Re:trouble with appeal
roz wrote:

i have recently won my appeal for esa. went from 12 points from assessment to 6 points at review, when dm removed 6 continence points because he failed to read atos medical report correctly, to 21 points at appeal, they reinstated those 6 points and gave me 15 points for standing instead of 6 points. great news u may think. alas no because same dm who removed 6 continence points has decided to write for statement of reasons with a view to appeal to upper tribunal. i am thoroughly depressed and don't think i can face any more of this torture. if they decide to appeal can i just start again with new esa claim or do i have to see it through to upper tribunal appeal. why have they decided to do this? i would welcome any comments and wonder if anyone else has had this happen after a successful appeal.



Hi,

Sorry to hear of your problems with your claim and appeal.

Unfortunately, just as you have a right to take a case to the upper tribunal if you think there has been an 'error of law or breach of natural justice, so do the DWP.

See this posting for what may count as an error of law:

www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/forum?func=vie...mit=6&start=18#72205

With regard to submitting a new claim, one must wait for at least 6 months from the initial decision to put in a new claim unless there has been a marked deterioration or new condition (either of which need to be documented). You haven't said of your own timescales involved so am not sure if the 6 month rule applies?.

However do remember if you abandon your claim (having in effect been found fit for work) and re-claim, if it is contributory ESA you are claiming you may fall outside of the National Insurance rules for claiming contributory ESA. You really need face to face advice to see if you would still qualify as the rules can be complex and it does depend on your own NI record.

Overall it may be worth seeking face to face advice about the whole claim from a welfare rights agency/CAB etc who can go through things in greater depth than we possibly can on the forum and give you precise advice on your own circumstances.

Pete
Last edit: 12 years 4 months ago by pete17971.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 4 months ago #76187 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic Re:trouble with appeal
Roz

Are you sure that the DWP are just appealing the six points for the Continence descriptor, as based on your post, you would still have 15 points from the Standing and Sitting one, which is enough to qualify for the WRAG.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • roz
  • Topic Author
12 years 4 months ago #76232 by roz
Replied by roz on topic Re:trouble with appeal
hi gordon and pete, thanks for your replies. i don't have much idea why they have asked for a statement of reasons or what they r looking for. the dm made a mistake in his submission because it appears that he didn't read the atos report correctly. the woman who did my submission also made a mistake but i pointed that out to the tribunal panel as soon as i went in to the room and gave them the correct facts.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.