does anyone know if there has been a legal challenge or caselaw decision that requires to make DM accountable for their decsions on ESA ...
what I am thinking about is the DM/atos advice rejecting a claim for exceptional cases ESA where they are advised but ignore the advice that a substantial risk exists in the claimant being required to either go onto jsa or wrag when they should be in the support group
what happens if the claimants health is then substantial damanged by trying to comply with the DM decision - who is accountable here
As far as I am aware, there have been no legal challenges or caselaw that has been made public pertaining to the circumstances you have described.
That is not to say that legal challenges haven't been made, but to the best of my knowledge B & W are not aware of any court cases or established caselaw on this particular issue?
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.
