- Posts: 452
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP and DLA Queries and Results
- Claimants meeting descriptors but placed in WRAG
× Members
Claimants meeting descriptors but placed in WRAG
- MariW
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
11 years 2 months ago - 11 years 2 months ago #97344 by MariW
Claimants meeting descriptors but placed in WRAG was created by MariW
Since the forum reopened last week, I’ve read at least two posts by or on people of people who obviously meet LCWRA criteria as set out in ESA Reg 34 (1) and (2) on grounds of either physical or mental incapacity. In one recent post ESA Reg 25 (2) would probably be relevant. Despite this, the claimants concerned have been placed in the WRAG. No doubt, there are many examples in the archives of this forum and others. I know this is a huge question but to what can this issue be attributed?
Last edit: 11 years 2 months ago by .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 2 months ago - 11 years 2 months ago #97345 by
Hi MW,
"Inaccurate" assessments by the ATOS HCP, and/or poor quality decision making by the DWP ESA DM, to name just a couple of the possible reasons.
bro58
Replied by on topic Claimants meeting descriptors but placed in WRAG
MariW wrote: Since the forum reopened last week, I’ve read at least two posts by or on people of people who obviously meet LCWRA criteria as set out in ESA Reg 34 (1) and (2) on grounds of either physical or mental incapacity. In one recent post ESA Reg 25 (2) would probably be relevant. Despite this, the claimants concerned have been placed in the WRAG. No doubt, there are many examples in the archives of this forum and others. I know this is a huge question but to what can this issue be attributed?
Hi MW,
"Inaccurate" assessments by the ATOS HCP, and/or poor quality decision making by the DWP ESA DM, to name just a couple of the possible reasons.
bro58
Last edit: 11 years 2 months ago by .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MariW
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 452
11 years 2 months ago #97346 by MariW
Replied by MariW on topic Claimants meeting descriptors but placed in WRAG
Thanks, bro58
Please excuse my typing error. I meant ESA Reg 35 (2)
Please excuse my typing error. I meant ESA Reg 35 (2)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: , Gordon, Gary, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, jimmck, Chris