substantial risk :regulation 35

What kind of evidence and from whom would be acceptable to DM /tribunal to sustantiate meeting reg 35...substantial risk if not found to have limited capability for work related activity?
I have explaine in detail the physical implications /exacerbation that would occur during the act of traveling and attending work related activity and my account has not been acknowledged.
What supporting evidence and from who would be accepted

nik wrote: What kind of evidence and from whom would be acceptable to DM /tribunal to sustantiate meeting reg 35...substantial risk if not found to have limited capability for work related activity?
I have explaine in detail the physical implications /exacerbation that would occur during the act of traveling and attending work related activity and my account has not been acknowledged.
What supporting evidence and from who would be accepted

Hi n,

See this topic from earlier today with a very similar query :

www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/forum?view=top...d=10&id=97227#100387

bro58

bro58 wrote:

nik wrote: What kind of evidence and from whom would be acceptable to DM /tribunal to sustantiate meeting reg 35...substantial risk if not found to have limited capability for work related activity?
I have explaine in detail the physical implications /exacerbation that would occur during the act of traveling and attending work related activity and my account has not been acknowledged.
What supporting evidence and from who would be accepted

Hi n,

See this topic from earlier today with a very similar query :

www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/forum?view=top...d=10&id=97227#100387

bro58

Hi n,

With respect to "who" could provide corroborative evidence, that could be, friends, relatives, carers, CPN's, Nurses, OT's, G.P.'s, Consultants, etc, etc.

bro58