× Members

asset rule for ESA(CB) part 2!

  • darryl
  • Topic Author
10 years 11 months ago - 10 years 11 months ago #103173 by darryl
asset rule for ESA(CB) part 2! was created by darryl
re my question yesterday and your answer, thank you. i am a bit dense sometimes, so does your reply mean that after 365 days i wont receive any ESA or even JSA at all because i've been on contributions based IB and now ESA{CB}? if so, i'll still be sick but broke then? many thanks for your patience in anticipation|
Last edit: 10 years 11 months ago by Gordon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 11 months ago - 10 years 11 months ago #103176 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic asset rule for ESA(CB) part 2!

darryl wrote: re my question yesterday and your answer, thank you. i am a bit dense sometimes, so does your reply mean that after 365 days i wont receive any ESA or even JSA at all because i've been on contributions based IB and now ESA{CB}? if so, i'll still be sick but broke then? many thanks for your patience in anticipation|


The Government changed the rules for ESA(CB) in April 2012, as a result, claimants who are in the WRAG, will only receive payment against their ESA(CB) for 365 days, after this time, if they are also eligible for ESA(IR), which is subject to a means test of income, savings and assets, and any hours that a partner works, then payments will continue, however, if they are not eligible, then they will only receive NI Credits which count towards a Full State Pension, although their ESA(CB) payments can be re-instated if they qualify for the Support Group.

The rules for JSA(CB) require the claimant to have NI Contributions in the required tax years, which we do not believe that someone who had previously been on IB will be able to achieve this. The rules for JSA(IR) are substantially the same as those for ESA(IR), so if you do not qualify for ESA(IR), you will not qualify for JSA(IR).

At the time, the Governments Impact Analysis expected some 400,000 ESA(CB) claimants to no longer qualify for any benefits, they are expected to be supported by their partner.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Last edit: 10 years 11 months ago by Gordon.
The following user(s) said Thank You: darryl

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.