cazzyclay wrote: I know you don't support upper tribunal appeals but just thought I'd mention i got a very quick response to my lengthy submission just saying my application had been denied by the district judge - reason being 'the statement is adequate to explainwhy the panel rejected the appeal' signed - the judge that did my first tier tribunal and was horrid and biased and who i complained about in it!! thankfully i am allowed to now fill out a form to apply directly to the uper tribunal - which i thought was what i was doing in the first place - but do you see how ludacrusly biased this is? why present the papers damning my FTT to the judge that denied it!!??
Because if the first Judge does accept the there is an Error then the claimant will receive a new hearing much earlier than if it has to go all of the way. It took just under a year for my second FT Tribunal to be held from the first one.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.
