Login FormClose

Free ESA, PIP and DLA Updates

With over 140,000 subscribers our fortnightly updates bulletin is the UK's leading source of benefits news. Get the facts about what's changing, how it affects you and how to prepare.   Get your free benefits updates now.

The DWP had a plan before the last election to charge for benefits appeals as a way of cutting costs, the Mirror has revealed. The plans also included reducing time limits for appeals and other measures.

The Mirror received a document from the DWP under the Freedom of Information Act in which details of plans to charge for appeals and other information had been heavily redacted in the ‘public interest’ according to the DWP.

However, it appears from screenshots shown in the Mirror that the redaction was done using software which allowed the Mirror to remove the black highlighting.

As a result, we can see that the DWP thought it would not be in the public interest for us to know that they were considering charging for benefits appeals, especially as ‘The possibility of fees has attracted negative coverage in the media/lobby when reported previously. Fees have also been blamed for the large reduction in ET [employment tribunal] appeals this year.’

The document went on to note that ‘When this was explored previously there was mixed views amongst the coalition’.

Now that the Tories no longer have to worry about the views of a coalition partner, there are fears that the plans could be revived.

Other ideas for a crackdown on the cost of appeals, apart from charging, included:

Narrowing the scope of the tribunal

Reducing appeal time length from 12 months to 3

Removing payment of ESA pending an appeal.

The DWP have issued a half-hearted denial that the plans could yet be introduced, stating that:

“These ideas were drafted by staff before the last election. They do not represent Government policy and have never been sent to Ministers.”

You can read the full story in the Mirror.



#4 Bill24chev 2016-05-16 11:56
I have no doubt that but for the European Court of Human Rights which is NOT part of the EU and EU Laws this Tory bunch would re introduce the "Poor Law" and the WORKHOUSE

+2 #3 Kier 2016-05-06 19:29
This government is capable of anything. Don't be surprised is such an oppressive rule is quietly slipped in through the backdoor.
+6 #2 eve 2016-05-04 20:51
why do they hate us? We just want to be treated fairly.To see others are not suffering at the hands of those that believe we are of no use . What happened to those people in government that stood for what is right.Most people who are ill are under hospital or clinic care by experts who understand their condition,And the evidence from them is clear enough to make a judgement on well before you even get to court.So if a judge on 50% of cases sees this person is ill or disabled on the evidence,we have to ask ourselves why did this get this far.And where the evidence was missed .Who failed to avoid the court cost,and suffering of this person.Then hold them to account.
+5 #1 Just Me 2016-05-03 15:38
Sadly I suspect we're get a version of this at some point in the near future.

They just want to make it as difficult to appeal as possible and will go to any lengths to achieve that.

I hate this government. :(

You need to be logged in to comment