cazzyclay wrote: I know you don't support upper tribunal appeals but just thought I'd mention i got a very quick response to my lengthy submission just saying my application had been denied by the district judge - reason being 'the statement is adequate to explainwhy the panel rejected the appeal' signed - the judge that did my first tier tribunal and was horrid and biased and who i complained about in it!! thankfully i am allowed to now fill out a form to apply directly to the uper tribunal - which i thought was what i was doing in the first place - but do you see how ludacrusly biased this is? why present the papers damning my FTT to the judge that denied it!!??
Because if the first Judge does accept the there is an Error then the claimant will receive a new hearing much earlier than if it has to go all of the way. It took just under a year for my second FT Tribunal to be held from the first one.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
