My client has just lost a PIP appeal. My query/concerns are:
(1) the fact that the chair turned down my client's request to consult notes (separate from the submitted bundle) she had brought with her - an aide memoire -to help answer an questions because one of her chief symptoms is forgetfulness. She was instructed to just answer the questions put to her. Is this a potential breach of natural justice so grounds for an appeal to the upper tier tribunal under that category?
(2)Also both of us found one of the panel members very hostile in demeanour , who presented very intimidating questioning /counter questioning the likes of which I have never encountered before - more like an interrogation with seemingly irrelevant lines of inquiry resulting at one point my client bursting into tears. Obviously I cannot go into the detail here but is this also grounds for an appeal to the UTT?
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.