esa/esa50form

had an assessment November 3 was in support group. Found fit for work, in the letter the decsion maker states that he has made his decision based on the HCP report evidence from my doctor and refers to my ESA50 questionnaire throughout Then goes on to say ESA50 sent but not returned.IN M reconsideration letter says the HCP does not need to see the ESA50 questionnaire and can do an assessment with out one.in decision letter states that he tried to telephone several times with out any response In the letter from the first decision maker is full of mistakes and lies decision maker has not even given his name so how do I know if the decision maker who did the mandatory reconsideration was not the same one the question is can a decision maker come to a fair and correct decision with out the ESA questionnaire.

yes I did return the ESA50 questionnaire .in the first decision letter it clearly states, that I have come to make my decision on evidence provided by you in the ESA questionnaire .Don't they stop ESA for not returning the questionnaire.also says tried to phone several times with out successes if they did not have my ESA50, where did they get my number from this is the only I form have written my contact number down on because it is a new telephone line and number. The whole letter is seems to have been written by someone who does not know what they are doing

Hi Gordon already done a MR the decision maker apologised for the confusion over the fact that the ESA50 questionnaire is referred to several times in the original decision makers letter even at end it clearly states / I have considered the HCP,s report and the ESA50 LCW questionnaire and have decided as a result you are no longer assessed as having LCW/,.The MR decision maker then goes on to say that he could not find any thing on file to do with my ESA questionnaire so can assume that the original decision maker did not have access to it when finding me fit for work but can still make a decision with out one. In the MR letter it does not give an explanation why the first decision maker refers to having my ESA questionnaire when in fact he did not have access to it Something's not wright trying to frighten me with quoting laws regulations acts ect decided to go to tribunal.