Appeal decision allowed, Help in deciphering

After waiting 8 months for my ESA appeal to be heard, it finally took place this week.
I have just received the decision which goes in my favour (what a relief).
The problem is I am not clear as to whether i remain in the support group or not, as it does not state clearly one way or the other.
I was granted 18 points which was made up of
6 for descriptor 12 Awareness of everyday hazards
6 for descriptor 14 Coping with change
6 for descriptor 15.Getting about

The decision then states that

No descriptor from schedule 3 of the ESA regulations was satisfied but regulation 35 of the ESA regulations 2008 applied
Due to my health condition it states i am significantly limited in the above activities.As a result the above schedule 2 descriptors are satisfied.Nevertheless he does not satisfy any Schedule 3 descriptors. However if he were to be found capable of work related activities this would result in a substantial risk of harm to himself and others given his health condition, to the point that his safety and that of others would be put at risk.
In reaching the decision the Tribunal placed particular reliance upon the evidence of the two consultants whose medical opinion to this effect has been submitted in evidence.

I would be grateful if someone is able to explain the above in "plain english"
Much obliged

Thank you Gordon for your prompt reply.
I am although confused as all 3 descriptors which i gained pointsi for are also descriptors in the Support Group . I am wondering why then I was not awarded the points in Schedule 3 as opposed to Schedule 2.
It is all so confusing, I would be grateful for your imput
Regards

Thanks for the reply, I much appreciate it Gordon.
I would like to thank yourself and your team for all the helpful information given within Benefits and Work . It has surely assisted me not only with the appeal, but from when i initially received the dreaded form 12 months ago.
Regards