× Members

This is a bit strange!

More
11 years 4 months ago - 11 years 4 months ago #96692 by summertrain
This is a bit strange! was created by summertrain
I sent in my completed ESA50 in November, and have heard nothing so far, so I rang ATOS to see what was happening, as I am concerned that mail may be delayed over the Christmas period. They have no record of even sending me an ESA50!

It should be pointed out that JC+ sent me the ESA50 and it was also returned to them, for attn of the IBR team there. When I questioned them that the ESA50 should be sent to ATOS, they said that they forward it on.

Presumably, a decision cannot be made without ATOS first seeing the ESA50?
I'm a wee bit concerned as I don't put the DWP past dirty tricks.

ATOS told me to ring the JC+, which are closed till 27th now.
Any thoughts?
Last edit: 11 years 4 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
11 years 4 months ago - 11 years 4 months ago #96696 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic This is a bit strange!

summertrain wrote: I sent in my completed ESA50 in November, and have heard nothing so far, so I rang ATOS to see what was happening, as I am concerned that mail may be delayed over the Christmas period. They have no record of even sending me an ESA50!

It should be pointed out that JC+ sent me the ESA50 and it was also returned to them, for attn of the IBR team there. When I questioned them that the ESA50 should be sent to ATOS, they said that they forward it on.

Presumably, a decision cannot be made without ATOS first seeing the ESA50?
I'm a wee bit concerned as I don't put the DWP past dirty tricks.

ATOS told me to ring the JC+, which are closed till 27th now.
Any thoughts?


Hi st,

I remember discussing this with you.

It is highly possible that ATOS may be based in the same office as the IBR Team, further a lot of these return addresses are no more than mail distribution centres.

I can't recall whether you have proof of delivery, if so then that is a plus. My best advice would be to send an e-mail to ATOS, reiterating your concerns, attach a scanned copy of the proof of posting and delivery if you have them. At least then you have written proof that you have raised your concerns.

Type up a letter of the same content, and put copies of the proof of posting/delivery in and post that off recorded delivery, ASAP after Xmas.

I have just had the scenario that you have recounted, in that the ATOS address on the return envelope was that of the BDC dealing with a friend that I was helping. It turns out that it is a mail distribution centre, and they have forwarded the ESA50 on to ATOS.

That was at the end of September, all was O.K. and they were placed into the SG, without a face to face, from the end of November.

You are right to be concerned, especially with the Xmas post.

Hope all works out well for you, keep us updated.

Have a good Xmas and NY. :) :)

bro58
Last edit: 11 years 4 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
11 years 4 months ago - 11 years 4 months ago #96697 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic This is a bit strange!

bro58 wrote:

summertrain wrote: I sent in my completed ESA50 in November, and have heard nothing so far, so I rang ATOS to see what was happening, as I am concerned that mail may be delayed over the Christmas period. They have no record of even sending me an ESA50!

It should be pointed out that JC+ sent me the ESA50 and it was also returned to them, for attn of the IBR team there. When I questioned them that the ESA50 should be sent to ATOS, they said that they forward it on.

Presumably, a decision cannot be made without ATOS first seeing the ESA50?
I'm a wee bit concerned as I don't put the DWP past dirty tricks.

ATOS told me to ring the JC+, which are closed till 27th now.
Any thoughts?


Hi st,

I remember discussing this with you.

It is highly possible that ATOS may be based in the same office as the IBR Team, further a lot of these return addresses are no more than mail distribution centres.

I can't recall whether you have proof of delivery, if so then that is a plus. My best advice would be to send an e-mail to ATOS, reiterating your concerns, attach a scanned copy of the proof of posting and delivery if you have them. At least then you have written proof that you have raised your concerns.

Type up a letter of the same content, and put copies of the proof of posting/delivery in and post that off recorded delivery, ASAP after Xmas.

I have just had the scenario that you have recounted, in that the ATOS address on the return envelope was that of the BDC dealing with a friend that I was helping. It turns out that it is a mail distribution centre, and they have forwarded the ESA50 on to ATOS.

That was at the end of September, all was O.K. and they were placed into the SG, without a face to face, from the end of November.

You are right to be concerned, especially with the Xmas post.

Hope all works out well for you, keep us updated.

Have a good Xmas and NY. :) :)

bro58


ATOS E-Mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Last edit: 11 years 4 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 4 months ago - 11 years 4 months ago #96700 by summertrain
Replied by summertrain on topic This is a bit strange!
Yes I do have proof of posting. It was received by them on 19th November.

What I can't understand is why ATOS have no record of it, Is it because they haven't been involved yet? And would ATOS likely have details on their system should a f to f be required at some stage?
Last edit: 11 years 4 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 4 months ago - 11 years 4 months ago #96701 by summertrain
Replied by summertrain on topic This is a bit strange!
Surely ATOS have to be involved in any case to make a decision?
Last edit: 11 years 4 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
11 years 4 months ago - 11 years 4 months ago #96703 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic This is a bit strange!

summertrain wrote: Yes I do have proof of posting. It was received by them on 19th November.

What I can't understand is why ATOS have no record of it, Is it because they haven't been involved yet? And would ATOS likely have details on their system should a f to f be required at some stage?


Hi st,

I admit is does seem strange.

The DWP refer you to ATOS, who then send out the ESA50.(therefore one would assume that ATOS would have a "Live Referral" with respect to yourself)

There do seem to be many anomalies, and they seem to be changing their operating systems Ad-hoc.

I cannot really offer any more helpful advice, you could mention in your E-mail/letter that you have copies of the ESA50/extra evidence ready to go, if that is the case. I can't remember whether you used the PDF ESA50, if you did, then you should have a post ready copy.

bro58
Last edit: 11 years 4 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: bro58GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.