- Posts: 776
× Members
Coffey break, but what happens next?
- phrank
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
2 years 4 months ago #273613 by phrank
Coffey break, but what happens next? was created by phrank
Hi all,
Well, Liz UnTrust has moved Therese Coffey up to Health Secretary and left us with a certain Ms Chloe Smith as her replacement.
I don't know much about the new DWP secretary but I bet it's not good news.
Hopefully I might be wrong.
Regards,
Phrank.
Well, Liz UnTrust has moved Therese Coffey up to Health Secretary and left us with a certain Ms Chloe Smith as her replacement.
I don't know much about the new DWP secretary but I bet it's not good news.
Hopefully I might be wrong.
Regards,
Phrank.
The following user(s) said Thank You: denby
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mollie
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 181
2 years 4 months ago #273632 by Mollie
Replied by Mollie on topic Coffey break, but what happens next?
This article in Disability News Service seems to indicate there will be little change
www.disabilitynewsservice.com/new-dwp-bo...ness-for-work-stats/
www.disabilitynewsservice.com/new-dwp-bo...ness-for-work-stats/
The following user(s) said Thank You: lesley, Gary
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phrank
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 776
2 years 4 months ago #273636 by phrank
Replied by phrank on topic Coffey break, but what happens next?
Hi all,
Why are disable people, severely ill in many, many cases, treated with such contempt by ministers who represent them and therefore should be fighting their cause?
For example; surely a secretary FOR disabled people should be just that and not AGAINST which is so often the case.
Has anyone got any idea?
No matter how I try, I haven't got a clue.
Regards,
Phrank.
Why are disable people, severely ill in many, many cases, treated with such contempt by ministers who represent them and therefore should be fighting their cause?
For example; surely a secretary FOR disabled people should be just that and not AGAINST which is so often the case.
Has anyone got any idea?
No matter how I try, I haven't got a clue.
Regards,
Phrank.
The following user(s) said Thank You: denby
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gary
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 8234
2 years 4 months ago #273638 by Gary
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gary on topic Coffey break, but what happens next?
Hi phrank
A very good question, for once I am lost for words to reply to your comment, not even a smiley will help me.
It could be that disabled Ministers believe disabled claimants are shirkers and not workers, although I know many disabled claimants who work, even when they are suffering in silence.
Gary
A very good question, for once I am lost for words to reply to your comment, not even a smiley will help me.
It could be that disabled Ministers believe disabled claimants are shirkers and not workers, although I know many disabled claimants who work, even when they are suffering in silence.
Gary
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: phrank, denby
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, Gary, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, Chris, David