- Posts: 13
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP, UC and DLA Queries and Results
- for BIS.. Pip assessment guidelines re. appointees.. again
× Members
for BIS.. Pip assessment guidelines re. appointees.. again
- sera
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
17 hours 32 minutes ago #312777 by sera
for BIS.. Pip assessment guidelines re. appointees.. again was created by sera
Hi apologies BIS
I’ve been trying to post a reply on my post from yesterday but they’re not coming through
I just had a question about whether you’d know if I’d have to prove to an assessor that my autistic nephew has lack of insight ? That was regarding me wanting to represent him without him being there, so he could be represented fairly.
And I wanted to thank you also
Hi BIS
That’s great information and advice again thank you
“ the HP should make every effort is quite a compelling part of that quote”
I think I’ve also seen it written somewhere that where a claimant lacks insight there should be a paper based review . I need to check, it might not still be in the guidance…. Although if it is I wonder if I would have to prove that my nephew has lack of insight….
I think that I’ve mentioned that my nephew has lack of insight on the pip application form. I know that I’ve mentioned it to them in a couple of letters I’ve recently sent to the dwp.
My nephews lack of insight is a big part of the reason why he can’t fairly represent himself…can’t fairly represent himself those are the exact words that should be used .
I don’t think that anyone would be able to give my nephew insight, he just sees things his way, it’s his perspective, that just isn’t right.
If we are both in the assessment together my nephew will feel that he will want to deny or contradict what I am saying. This just happened in a mental health appointment with my mother as an advocate, it’s happened in FE college, and it happens at home.
That’s so right, the autism should be brought out/put forward.
Yes, the appointee can’t manage the process at any time.
A number of years ago I was newly brain injured and was merely my nephew’s companion in a pip assessment. My nephew right the way through, just answered that he could do everything that he can’t do. The assessor wouldn’t allow me to speak and it was obvious that my nephew didn’t want me to speak either. After the assessment was over I spoke to her with my nephew out of earshot . I seem to remember she was shaking her head in response and said it’s best to get him into work and best to do it asap. This was a pip assessment, an in work or out of work benefit.
Apologies for the longish reply. I just thought that you might want to know.
Many thanks, I’m very grateful again
I’ve been trying to post a reply on my post from yesterday but they’re not coming through
I just had a question about whether you’d know if I’d have to prove to an assessor that my autistic nephew has lack of insight ? That was regarding me wanting to represent him without him being there, so he could be represented fairly.
And I wanted to thank you also
Hi BIS
That’s great information and advice again thank you
“ the HP should make every effort is quite a compelling part of that quote”
I think I’ve also seen it written somewhere that where a claimant lacks insight there should be a paper based review . I need to check, it might not still be in the guidance…. Although if it is I wonder if I would have to prove that my nephew has lack of insight….
I think that I’ve mentioned that my nephew has lack of insight on the pip application form. I know that I’ve mentioned it to them in a couple of letters I’ve recently sent to the dwp.
My nephews lack of insight is a big part of the reason why he can’t fairly represent himself…can’t fairly represent himself those are the exact words that should be used .
I don’t think that anyone would be able to give my nephew insight, he just sees things his way, it’s his perspective, that just isn’t right.
If we are both in the assessment together my nephew will feel that he will want to deny or contradict what I am saying. This just happened in a mental health appointment with my mother as an advocate, it’s happened in FE college, and it happens at home.
That’s so right, the autism should be brought out/put forward.
Yes, the appointee can’t manage the process at any time.
A number of years ago I was newly brain injured and was merely my nephew’s companion in a pip assessment. My nephew right the way through, just answered that he could do everything that he can’t do. The assessor wouldn’t allow me to speak and it was obvious that my nephew didn’t want me to speak either. After the assessment was over I spoke to her with my nephew out of earshot . I seem to remember she was shaking her head in response and said it’s best to get him into work and best to do it asap. This was a pip assessment, an in work or out of work benefit.
Apologies for the longish reply. I just thought that you might want to know.
Many thanks, I’m very grateful again
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BIS
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 10100
11 hours 42 minutes ago #312798 by BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by BIS on topic for BIS.. Pip assessment guidelines re. appointees.. again
Hi sera
i think you need to think of this as two different processes.
1. Applying to be your nephew's appointee. Providing your nephew agrees, that is not a difficult process. However, from what you're saying, he may not agree to it. As a family you need to try and help him see the benefits of having an appointee.
2. Once you become an appointee - it's a case of being able to battle the assessor who may want to try and speak to him. That's when you say that the difficulties he has mean that he cannot represent himself because he will say what he thinks the assessor wants to hear, not what is true, and that means that you need to speak on his behalf to prevent him from being discriminated against. I can't tell you more than that - it's a case of having to stand your ground and repeat what it says on the government website.
BIS
i think you need to think of this as two different processes.
1. Applying to be your nephew's appointee. Providing your nephew agrees, that is not a difficult process. However, from what you're saying, he may not agree to it. As a family you need to try and help him see the benefits of having an appointee.
2. Once you become an appointee - it's a case of being able to battle the assessor who may want to try and speak to him. That's when you say that the difficulties he has mean that he cannot represent himself because he will say what he thinks the assessor wants to hear, not what is true, and that means that you need to speak on his behalf to prevent him from being discriminated against. I can't tell you more than that - it's a case of having to stand your ground and repeat what it says on the government website.
BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: latetrain, BIS, Catherine12345, Chris, David, Forum Moderator