We will have to wait for the publication of the Green Paper later today for full details of changes to personal Independence payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC).

But here are some of the main points of the speech.

Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

  • No vouchers
  • No means-test
  • No freeze.

But, from November 2026, claimants will need to score at least 4 points from a single descriptor to qualify for the daily living component of PIP, as well as scoring a total of at least 8 points..

So, if you select 4 descriptors scoring two points each, that will be 8 points, but it will not qualify for an award. 

But if you select one descriptor scoring 4 points and two descriptors scoring 2 points, that will be 8 points and you will qualify for an award.

There will also be review of the PIP assessment system led by disability minister Stephen Timms.

PIP existing claimants

The DWP says it "will work with Department of Health and Social Care to ensure that existing people who claim PIP who may no longer be entitled to the benefit following an award review under new eligibility rules have their health and eligible care needs met. The government is consulting on how best to achieve this."

This suggests that existing claimants will be subject to the new rules when their award is reviewed.

 Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

The WCA is to be scrapped in 2028 and a new single assessment system introduced. Under the new system, any extra financial support for health conditions (including PIP, ESA or UC health) will be assessed via a new single assessment which will be based on the PIP assessment – considering on the impact of disability on daily living, not on capacity to work.

There will be an increase in  Face-to-Face Assessments for PIP and the WCA.

Reintroduce reassessments for incapacity benefits, with exceptions for those who will never work and those under special rules for end-of-life care. Reassessments have largely been switched off since 2021.

A "Right To Try Guarantee" will be introduced which will guarantee that attempting work will never lead to a benefits reassessment.

Universal Credit (UC)

From April 2026, Labour will hold the value of the universal credit health top-up fixed in cash terms for existing claimants, and reduce it for new claimants, with an additional premium for people with severe lifelong condition

The Standard Allowance will be raised above inflation by 2029/30, adding £775 annually in cash terms for a single person aged over 25.

Access to the health element of Universal Credit will be delayed until a claimant is aged 22.

Existing claimants.  The DWP say “Those currently in receipt of UC health will benefit from the increased standard allowance and will not be affected by plans to reduce UC health in future.”

Assessments

People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed.

When

The DWP say they will bring forward primary legislation this session to enable delivery of the PIP additional eligibility requirement and UC rebalancing reforms from 26/27.

The Right to Work Guarantee will be delivered through separate primary legislation which will be introduced “in due course”. 

Savings

The DWP say the changes are expected to save over £5 billion in 2029 to 2030.

Links

The Pathways to Work:  Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper.

 Liz Kendall speech

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    regarding pip there is no way existing claims will be subject to new rules, you cannot change them once you have qualified for the benefit, all they are doing is moving the goal posts, this will be taken to the high court in london, its like passing your driving test then change the rules now you have to  take it again, it just wont happen, clearly the government have got this wrong.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    Overall, these changes seem fairly discriminatory to me, especially towards younger people who already get lower UC payments and are restricted with housing benefit, get paid less at work etc. Not like cost of living is lower for a 20 year old. Autism certainly affected me in broadly the same ways back then, as it does now as a 30 year old. Just because someone is young, doesn't mean a disability is less of a disability. When I was at school, I knew someone with type 1 diabetes, it didn't affect them less just because they were young! 

    Also, are Labour expecting us to be grateful PIP will go up next year after all? Talk about the bare minimum. Changes to welfare and DWP are definitely needed, but they need to end this toxic culture and move to a more logical, fair and humane system. Not talks of yet more cuts, which are always counter-productive! A good starting point would be to drastically reduce the numbers of reassessments, many conditions, it is simply pointless to reassess someone like me every couple years. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    i just read this and i'm like
    i don't think the government know what they're doing
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @smells like team spirit @smells like team spirit, that's the most sensible comment so far in 4 pages. There's no way anyone trying to interpret these proposals will be able to implement anything. There are too many variables. The green paper has not been properly thought through or fully formulated. It's just thrown together an incoherent government wish list with no clear path to realisation.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    They will also be effectively halving the UC health award. You would only get that if you got the DLA from PIP. You would only get that if you got 4 points in one category.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    All new claims for UC with lcwra from April 2026 will have their entitlement reduced by £47 per week, meaning anyone deemed as having lcwra will only get £200.a month above the standard UC rate.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @Marc no one moving as late as that ,i think sunak ditched that ,it is to be wrapped up by april 2026.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Marc The government plan is for everyone to migrate by the end of April 2026.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Anon @Anon sorry that was meant for your previous comment re scrapping wca
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Anon @Anon, that's what I'd like to know. It seems very insidious. 
      I know some think what they heard today wasn't too bad. I think it's horrible.most of it we kind of expected but it's still so cruel.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Anon I wonder what happens to those due to switch to UC from ESA (support group) in 2028?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    "Don't worry you might lose all your money but Labour are compassionate" I think such statements like that cause more distress or maybe that is the intention.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    Just found this, this is really bad.

    112. Both UC and PIP will still exist in the reformed system. UC will remain a means-tested benefit for those people that are in work and on a low income, or are out of work. Without the WCA eligibility criteria, the additional health element in UC will no longer be linked in any way to someone’s capacity to work or their work status. Instead, eligibility to the additional UC health element will be based on whether someone is receiving any Daily Living Award in PIP.[footnote 75]
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Jack Yep.  The devil in the detail.  if the eligibility changes go ahead.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    I'm getting the impression some people are ok with it and some people aren't so basically mixed messages and nothing clear.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @James Correct, James. Your comments are always on point. The 4 point on a single descriptor rule will result in millions losing all support. I think the entire consultation is misleading and unfair, and is presenting these reforms as being about moving disabled people into a job shortfall that doesn't match the numbers, while the central basis of these reforms is clearly about saving money.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @James they're not consulting on that though, it says so in the consultation.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Dave Dee The single most important thing to overturn is the so called 4 point rule in any one activity as this will deny PIP to many people and it is a slight of hand that I hope other Labour and LibDem MP's contest as well as in the Lords
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    I currently get 13 points for daily living. including (Praise be!) 4 points in one category. My PIP was renewed just before I turned 66, so I am on the light touch 10 year review. Hopefully the proposed changes won't impact me for at least another 9 years. I'm relieved but also angry and confused...  It seems to me that in order to score a 4 on any of the daily living categories you need to be incapable of performing the task without a carer; doesn't the "I" in PIP  stand for Independence? Someone scoring 3s over all the categories will get nothing, which can't be fair in anyone's reasonable judgment. When you factor in the uninformed and often seemingly biased views of the assessors, getting a 4 in any category will be extremely difficult. It seems to be paving the way for hundreds of thousands of people to "just miss" the cut-off,( just as we have seen with the winter fuel allowance means testing and the attendance allowance upper earnings limit), resulting in just the same kinds of needless and senseless suffering.  Any change will produce winners and losers, but this has all the hallmarks of producing barely worthy winners and extremely worthy losers.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Where will they get the data to see who is exempt from reassessment In pip?  And the supplement ?

    The reason I ask is that many of those you would expect to be candidates , will be on 10 year extended reviews currently, and therefore won’t have a review to tick this box. Or maybe they will use the fact that they have already been assesed to be on a 10 year review?
    Any thoughts….
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Matt was just going on what I know. if you have duel sensory loss then to my mind, it is unlikely you will be reassessed. what's the point in doing that if your award is correct as per the law?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @shadowpony As someone with dual sensory loss due to maternal Rubella, it's even harder 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Mick totally blind people for instance, they need supervision or assistance to cook, which is reading the instructions on a packet or someone to help them while cooking. also support to engage with others, which is someone telling them who is in the room, or describing things etc. also reading, a blind person cannot read with the eyes, they use screenreaders etc.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Mick I think the answer to this and many other comments regards reviews was in her speech today for pip claimants suggesting that regular face to face or vid reviews also recording of them going forward will take place 

      Now as to which group in pip this affects claiming pip at this point is very confusing indeed 

      Light touch pensioners 10 yr??
      Short term Anyone ??
      Long term 10 yr light touch severe illness 
      Etc etc 

      Seems no one even on Labour back benches have questioned this pre speech or latter 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Actually, looking through this two points thing is a lot more sinister than it first appears. I qualify as get a lot of points on one section but for a lot of people with mental health issues, it might not be like that. Apparently this is not going to come into effect until November 2026? And there has been a big backlash in the House of Commons, which is a very good sign. People can see what is going on! Hopefully this will be challenged!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @axab43 Dont hold your breath 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @axab43 There will be a fight over the PIP care element's 4 point rule and it is ignoring the overall accumulative effect on a person over the other descriptors. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    So they are going to scrap the WCA for Universal credit but will use the results of your pip assessment instead?

     Does this mean, if you are denied pip because you don't get the 4 points on one descriptor,  under the new criteria, then you won't qualify for lcwra?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    What I can see is a lot of cold pensioners who just applied for PIP to qualify for heating allowance probably won't reach the basic daily living points.  Not to mention blue badges and disabled bus passes. Well we know who will be doing the extra assignments NHS UK moved to other departments. WCA to cease by 2028 but probably ramped up this year. Another saving could be disability reduction for council Tax.  Always there will be hidden damage and costs.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Claire Yes that's correct but if they qualified then became pensioners then it's an on going claim until reassessed or for life for some so there's a lot of people pension age still getting it  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Poppy Pensioners cannot apply for pip,has to be attendance allowance.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Just to clarify note Article 53 and 54 for those like myself in the support group of Contributory ESA Support Group. The change in entitlement would appear to apply to New Claimants not existing Claimants. Here are the relevant articles 53 and 54 for clarification
     :Unemployment insurance would be a new non-means tested entitlement for people who have contributed into the system. It would be created by replacing contribution-based Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) and Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) with a new single entitlement, paid at the current ESA rate (currently £138pw) and will be time-limited. This would provide stronger income protection during periods of unemployment for those with a recent work record, while revitalising the ‘something-for-something’ contributory principle in the working-age system. People claiming this would be expected to actively seek work, with easements for those with work-limiting health conditions.

    54. Alongside levelling up the rate, this change would end the indefinite entitlement to contributory ESA for those assessed as having limited capability for work-related activity (for new people claiming). Those unemployed after the time-limited period would be able to claim UC, depending on their personal circumstances. We believe this reform would align with the removal of the WCA, by offering a route to financial support for those with temporary and short-term health conditions, including for those who may not be entitled to PIP and therefore not entitled to the health element of UC
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Chocolady 'It's saying for new people claiming'. I think there needs to be more clarification on that.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @John Thank you. I do wish they specifically stated it only applied to new claimants. This just says the existing benefit is being replaced by a new one. No indication of whether exiting claimants will be moved over to a time limited benefit.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @John It looks to me as if they are just replacing the contributory esa support with a new form which is time limited and forcing you into work whether suitable or not.  Cant see where it says any differentiation between new or existing claimants for this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @John Thank you John I was so upset this afternoon hopefully this is the case that this change is for some of the poor souls coming in the future!  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @John So does this mean currently people on esa support group contribution based will
      Continue to
      Claim this I have read so
      Much my mind is blown ? But i hope you are right 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    'From November 2026, claimants will need to score at least 4 points from a single descriptor to qualify for the daily living component of PIP'
    You know what this change means? It means hundreds of thousands of disabled people having their PIP removed completely. For what? For not having one big 'severe' disability. For supposedly only having so called minor disabilities. Completely discounting those living with multiple conditions and disabilities. This is going to ruin lives. Not just a few. Hundreds of thousands. I don't think people realise the sheer scale of the changes they are proposing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @JH I Will give you an example: me. My mother contacted Rubella in the days BEFORE a vaccine. Do, I have substantially reduced eyesight, hearing and am a type 1.5 diabetic requiring insulin. Yet I work, live independently ( don't start me on social care), pay tax, earn not much more than the minimum wage (because employers don't want to know), and because I get a range of 2 points I am going to be considerably worse off. How about removing the tax threshold for those on low wages?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @JH You're completely right.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @JH But does this also apply to existing claimants or just new claimants to PiP?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    What about those of us who currently receive UC and LCWRA? How much will we lose?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @Anon You would be affected when you get reassessed under the new rules for LCWRA. yes if you managed to keep LCWRA, you would keep the old amount of 400. 

      but if you fail to get the DLA part of PIP, you would no longer receive the LCWRA as well.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Anon Thank Christ for that 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Neil Cook Anyone getting UC lcwra before 2026 won't be affected, only new claims after April 2026.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Neil Cook As far as I can tell - nothing, but the amount received will be frozen going forward.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    What about the nearly 1 million of us still on DLA? What will happen if we are migrated over, should we switch sooner, or later when migrated? Which rules will apply?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @livingproof This is what I'd like to know as I'm still on dla and cb Esa.  I haven't been moved over to pip or uc yet.   It's all so confusing and stressful
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @livingproof That's what I am worried about I am still on DLA lifetime award will we loose it when we are migrated to PIP I am 65 I really don't understand it .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    What about those of us still on DLA? If migrated, are we under the 'old' rules or the new? If the new ones, that hardly seems fair?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    I'm looking for the positives here.  Labour are not as demonising as the Tories would've been (we know how Tories always played to right wing press who love to demonise us and make us feel worse). Kendall has a point that our potential is being wasted.  I hope this "right to try work" and these new work coaches will be properly trained to deal with usindependence.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Clay There are very few, if any. They have moved the goalposts and changed the parameters meaning thousands will lose out because they don't hit that 4 point target in one sepcific disability, dispite having multiple contibuting disabilities. It's an absolute travesty as far as I can tell. Throwing the baby out with the bath water doesnt even come close. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Clay So forcing thousands of people onto the job market without creating any new jobs? How exactly is that going to work?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Clay Labour arent any different from the tories they are no more compassionate just use nicer words.  Pip is a benefit that people use to get to work how is this getting people into work?  Its just benefit cuts plain and simple no different from tories.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Clay
      "Kendall has a point that our potential is being wasted."

      Maybe, but you don't unlock that potential by driving people further into grinding poverty. That just makes their health even worse and thus drives them even further away from getting a job. It's utterly counterproductive.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    Oh just read this 
    Changing PIP Eligibility: PIP will be targeted more on those with higher needs by requiring a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, in addition to the existing eligibility criteria.. DWP will work with DHSC to ensure that existing people who claim PIP who may no longer be entitled to the benefit following an award review under new eligibility rules have their health and eligible care needs met. The government is consulting on how best to achieve this. So do we to then get an extra 4 points in one area and still have to get the 12 points on top to keep our pip 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @A6 If you go on the government website about it, to compensate on not getting pip you will get health related help. Not money I don't think , do we fill another form out when our review comes up.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @A6 Another paragraph suggests the idea of "transitional protection" for those who have had PIP and lose it.  And also asks what support could be given for those who score lots of points but spread out over many questions.  Could that be a third tier of pip?  These details could make a huge difference to us, but they're going to get thrashed out over the coming months.  

      So, regarding eligibility, to get Daily Living, you would still need to get 8-12 points overall but 4 of those points must come from a single criteria/question.  

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact