- Posts: 84
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP and DLA Queries and Results
- Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
× Members
Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
- MDBond
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
8 months 1 week ago #289071 by MDBond
Replied by MDBond on topic Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
Thanks Wendy, I'm sure they will
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MDBond
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 84
8 months 1 week ago #289076 by MDBond
Replied by MDBond on topic Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
Hi BIS
Thank you, really appreciate your support
Yes, I'm not surprised at the outcome but it has upset me, to see what they've written. Yes I agree with you, it definitely confirms that they didn't believe me. I'm sure everyone in my position says this but they seemed determined to take against me from the start and I've no idea why, and yes, they were largely hostile. The first question the judge asked was: "I'd just like to confirm there has never been any application for carer's allowance?" I found this surprising and an odd question to ask as I've never made an application for this and the only reason why I mentioned this in my complaint letter to the DWP - I believe this is where the panel saw it and leapt upon it - was because the DWP assessor had accused me of 'caring for my mum' in the PA4, which I made clear I didn't and only helped her with tasks when I was able to/better. My transcript proved this. Initially when I heard the judge say this, I thought, oh hopefully they're on my side, but later in the interrogation, he asked why I hadn't made any application for ESA, why I hadn't claimed PIP before now and then also that question about what I was living on! I mean, it's obvious they think I'm some kind of benefit cheat or have some sort of hidden agenda although God knows what that is.
I know initially I said I was tempted to fight this, but it's upset me to see what they've written and I can't see the point anymore. Nobody believes me no matter what I say, and they seem determined to believe I'm a liar or a fraud. This is the second time I've been put through a 2 hour ordeal where nobody has listened to what I've said. I was going to call my GP and put him on the spot regarding my medication but I don't think there's anything stronger available? And also why should I do that, just to jump through another hoop for this blasted PIP claim? Even if I do by some miracle get something stronger - which I doubt I will because no GP has ever offered to prescribe me a stronger painkiller than I already have and believe me I've told past GPs I thought I was going to die from the pain and being repeatedly violently sick/dry retching - I'm sure there will still be a Godawful judge at the end who's determined not to believe a word I'm saying. And even if I do finally get the referral to the endo clinic my GP promised me months ago, I still won't be believed. So really, what's the point?
And yes, the phrase 'help-seeking behaviour' is patronising and nasty. They were determined NOT to believe I had any difficulties socialising or any form of depression or anxiety, despite making it clear in my application I do and despite the fact that I was a ball of tears pretty much throughout. The disability guy was almost laughing in disbelief when I said I didn't socialise as I had little desire to even when I was better, he asked if any relatives come round and no they largely don't but apparently this must be a lie, he asked if I ever go out to restaurants and I said no (again true as I have little appetite too but he clearly thought otherwise), he asked if I'd celebrated my birthday by going out, again no as it only reminds me of how rubbish my life is, but he obviously thought I was lying. They were obsessed with asking me why I often went out with my mum, I feel this was calculated to embarrass me.
I really think they saw it as sport. The disability guy was almost laughing, certainly smiling when he interrupted me and said: "You don't come across as shy! You seem very confident." And this, when I had amassed a collection of tissues on the table in front of me.
As I've said in a previous post I find it impossible to talk about what my life is like now without crying. So, I don't want to embarrass and humiliate myself even further only not to be believed. I will just have to accept the basic award although it really upsets me to effectively be called a liar and degraded for 2 hours in front of a room full of strangers, when they obviously didn't want to grant me anything from the start.
How on earth is anyone expected to be able to think and answer coherently when they're in such a state? I'm really angry that there's nowhere I can report this panel for their needless bullying. At no point did they stop to allow me to compose myself, at no point did they offer any reassuring or comforting words, they failed to stop the DWP woman from asking questions about information that wasn't in the bundle - surely any decent judge would have stepped in to at least ask what on earth she was doing and what she was referring to because she was on a laptop that nobody else could see?! - and they clearly didn't give a rat's behind about me or my welfare.
I sent the letter off yesterday to ask for the statement of reasons and audio recording - they did say we were being recorded - but I honestly don't know if I've got the strength to even listen to the recording itself. It will upset me, hearing myself be so distressed, and I've already said I found it hard to be consistent or give consistent answers all the time as towards the end I just wanted to get out of there. I know I was being consistent at the start and at times, but in all honesty, if they were determined not to believe me, there's nothing I could say and even less I could do, to convince them otherwise, so I effectively gave up even trying to answer as I wanted to in the end.
But I guess this is what they wanted. So now they will be able to say I wasn't consistent. But how could I or anyone be consistent in these circumstances? If this is what happens usually then it's a disgrace. People who say the panel isn't there to catch you out or ask trick questions clearly haven't witnessed a panel like the one I had.
Sorry for the long post but I don't know what else to say
Also apparently if a Tribunal grants an award, then you have to re apply for PIP at the end of your current award? Just seems little point in any of this if everyone seems determined not to believe you and there's no guarantee any other judge will listen, so it all seems a huge waste of effort as well. I will also need some kind of support worker to help identify points of law if I want to take this further but I don't have anyone and doubt there's anyone decent locally. I approached a local centre last year but the girl I spoke to also seemed disbelieving and a bit useless in my opinion. She didn't seem to know or offer much knowledge when I met her. And yes I broke down in front of her as well.
Thank you, really appreciate your support
Yes, I'm not surprised at the outcome but it has upset me, to see what they've written. Yes I agree with you, it definitely confirms that they didn't believe me. I'm sure everyone in my position says this but they seemed determined to take against me from the start and I've no idea why, and yes, they were largely hostile. The first question the judge asked was: "I'd just like to confirm there has never been any application for carer's allowance?" I found this surprising and an odd question to ask as I've never made an application for this and the only reason why I mentioned this in my complaint letter to the DWP - I believe this is where the panel saw it and leapt upon it - was because the DWP assessor had accused me of 'caring for my mum' in the PA4, which I made clear I didn't and only helped her with tasks when I was able to/better. My transcript proved this. Initially when I heard the judge say this, I thought, oh hopefully they're on my side, but later in the interrogation, he asked why I hadn't made any application for ESA, why I hadn't claimed PIP before now and then also that question about what I was living on! I mean, it's obvious they think I'm some kind of benefit cheat or have some sort of hidden agenda although God knows what that is.
I know initially I said I was tempted to fight this, but it's upset me to see what they've written and I can't see the point anymore. Nobody believes me no matter what I say, and they seem determined to believe I'm a liar or a fraud. This is the second time I've been put through a 2 hour ordeal where nobody has listened to what I've said. I was going to call my GP and put him on the spot regarding my medication but I don't think there's anything stronger available? And also why should I do that, just to jump through another hoop for this blasted PIP claim? Even if I do by some miracle get something stronger - which I doubt I will because no GP has ever offered to prescribe me a stronger painkiller than I already have and believe me I've told past GPs I thought I was going to die from the pain and being repeatedly violently sick/dry retching - I'm sure there will still be a Godawful judge at the end who's determined not to believe a word I'm saying. And even if I do finally get the referral to the endo clinic my GP promised me months ago, I still won't be believed. So really, what's the point?
And yes, the phrase 'help-seeking behaviour' is patronising and nasty. They were determined NOT to believe I had any difficulties socialising or any form of depression or anxiety, despite making it clear in my application I do and despite the fact that I was a ball of tears pretty much throughout. The disability guy was almost laughing in disbelief when I said I didn't socialise as I had little desire to even when I was better, he asked if any relatives come round and no they largely don't but apparently this must be a lie, he asked if I ever go out to restaurants and I said no (again true as I have little appetite too but he clearly thought otherwise), he asked if I'd celebrated my birthday by going out, again no as it only reminds me of how rubbish my life is, but he obviously thought I was lying. They were obsessed with asking me why I often went out with my mum, I feel this was calculated to embarrass me.
I really think they saw it as sport. The disability guy was almost laughing, certainly smiling when he interrupted me and said: "You don't come across as shy! You seem very confident." And this, when I had amassed a collection of tissues on the table in front of me.
As I've said in a previous post I find it impossible to talk about what my life is like now without crying. So, I don't want to embarrass and humiliate myself even further only not to be believed. I will just have to accept the basic award although it really upsets me to effectively be called a liar and degraded for 2 hours in front of a room full of strangers, when they obviously didn't want to grant me anything from the start.
How on earth is anyone expected to be able to think and answer coherently when they're in such a state? I'm really angry that there's nowhere I can report this panel for their needless bullying. At no point did they stop to allow me to compose myself, at no point did they offer any reassuring or comforting words, they failed to stop the DWP woman from asking questions about information that wasn't in the bundle - surely any decent judge would have stepped in to at least ask what on earth she was doing and what she was referring to because she was on a laptop that nobody else could see?! - and they clearly didn't give a rat's behind about me or my welfare.
I sent the letter off yesterday to ask for the statement of reasons and audio recording - they did say we were being recorded - but I honestly don't know if I've got the strength to even listen to the recording itself. It will upset me, hearing myself be so distressed, and I've already said I found it hard to be consistent or give consistent answers all the time as towards the end I just wanted to get out of there. I know I was being consistent at the start and at times, but in all honesty, if they were determined not to believe me, there's nothing I could say and even less I could do, to convince them otherwise, so I effectively gave up even trying to answer as I wanted to in the end.
But I guess this is what they wanted. So now they will be able to say I wasn't consistent. But how could I or anyone be consistent in these circumstances? If this is what happens usually then it's a disgrace. People who say the panel isn't there to catch you out or ask trick questions clearly haven't witnessed a panel like the one I had.
Sorry for the long post but I don't know what else to say
Also apparently if a Tribunal grants an award, then you have to re apply for PIP at the end of your current award? Just seems little point in any of this if everyone seems determined not to believe you and there's no guarantee any other judge will listen, so it all seems a huge waste of effort as well. I will also need some kind of support worker to help identify points of law if I want to take this further but I don't have anyone and doubt there's anyone decent locally. I approached a local centre last year but the girl I spoke to also seemed disbelieving and a bit useless in my opinion. She didn't seem to know or offer much knowledge when I met her. And yes I broke down in front of her as well.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- denby
- Away
Less More
- Posts: 1251
8 months 1 week ago #289082 by denby
Replied by denby on topic Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
Oh MDBond, I am fighting back tears myself after reading this latest post from you.
Please, you must do what is best for your own health and self respect. But please God you can one day find support from an organisation or person, who can accompany you to any hearing you choose to instigate, and step in to defend you, if, God forfend, anyone tries to treat you badly again.
In the meantime, remember that the BBC used to reckon for every letter they get there were ten listeners who had that opinion. On the same principle, for every one of us who has posted to support you, there ARE hordes of friendly, fellow suffering B&W readers sending you sympathy and virtual support. Please take strength from this,
Denby
Please, you must do what is best for your own health and self respect. But please God you can one day find support from an organisation or person, who can accompany you to any hearing you choose to instigate, and step in to defend you, if, God forfend, anyone tries to treat you badly again.
In the meantime, remember that the BBC used to reckon for every letter they get there were ten listeners who had that opinion. On the same principle, for every one of us who has posted to support you, there ARE hordes of friendly, fellow suffering B&W readers sending you sympathy and virtual support. Please take strength from this,
Denby
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gaddy, Wendy Woo, MDBond
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gaddy
- Away
Less More
- Posts: 119
8 months 1 week ago #289083 by Gaddy
Replied by Gaddy on topic Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
Hi MDBond,
I was also not believed at my tribunal, one descriptor the GP denied that one of my symptoms had anything to do with one of my illnesses. My representative was furious about that as he had done his own research and knew that was incorrect. There were several other descriptors that they tried to minimise and catch me out on or thats how it felt
. I know I won but there was not much joy in it initially because of the whole humiliating sorry experience. I think you should give yourself some time and see how you feel in a week or 2. You don't have to decide right now and you need the statement of reasons to see if there room for you to argue there has been an error in law. And remember that those of us who have read your posts believe you. Just be kind to yourself and give yourself some time.
Wishing you all the best,
Gaddy
I was also not believed at my tribunal, one descriptor the GP denied that one of my symptoms had anything to do with one of my illnesses. My representative was furious about that as he had done his own research and knew that was incorrect. There were several other descriptors that they tried to minimise and catch me out on or thats how it felt
. I know I won but there was not much joy in it initially because of the whole humiliating sorry experience. I think you should give yourself some time and see how you feel in a week or 2. You don't have to decide right now and you need the statement of reasons to see if there room for you to argue there has been an error in law. And remember that those of us who have read your posts believe you. Just be kind to yourself and give yourself some time.
Wishing you all the best,
Gaddy
The following user(s) said Thank You: denby, MDBond
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LL26
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 1425
8 months 1 week ago #289085 by LL26
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by LL26 on topic Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
Hi MDBond,
Sorry to hear that you didn't succeed at appeal.
Apply for the Written Statement of reasons (WSOR) and ask for a copy of the record of proceedings- probably a CD. It may take a little while for these to arrive.
In the meantime, try and gather your thoughts about what was said, the manner of the tribunal, did they ask relevant questions etc etc. A good place to start would be about the help seeking behaviour - what do they mean by this?
In order to appeal, you will need to find a material error of law.
Look at the appeal bundle. Listen to the CD match these with comments in the WSOR.
Consider the following:
1. Are there any glaring disparities of evidence, so for example if in the papers and at the hearing you said 'I need help to get on/out of the bath, as I fall over without help ' However the WSOR says 'no difficulties with bathing.' This suggests the tribunal have ignored the evidence.
2. Consider the legal tests - firstly consider the descriptors- so the test for descriptor 1 is to be able to prepare and cook a simple meal for one with fresh ingredients. If the tribunal deny points saying eg 'appellant can always use a microwave to reheat meals his mother makes for him' - this is the wrong legal test- it does not address the test requiring food to be self made from fresh ingredients. Using this example further, if the Tribunal are aware that your mother makes meals there may also be a further error of law if there failure to make proper investigation, if the tribunal don't explore obvious matters.
3. Is there a proper explanation of what's been decided?- eg at paragraph 21 - There is clear medical evidence showing that the claimant struggles to walk, and has been observed by the GP to shuffle along with poor balance. Then later at para 49 the WSOR says 'the assessment states no problems with walking and we consider this evidence to be correct.'
What about the GP evidence? It is ignored and hasn't been explained. Why is the assessment correct?
The tribunal need to ensure they make a proper explanation. There would be no error of law if the tribunal write in para 50. 'We have considered GPS evidence, but it relates to September 2012, and we are aware of surgery since. The assessor carried out a full mobility survey and this was accepted as correct by the claimant.'
4. Think about Regs 7 and 4A. Supposing you have epilepsy, and you have unpredictable fits. On three occasions last month you collapsed unconscious in the kitchen. You were scalded when you knocked over a pan during one fit. The tribunal decide that you have no mental health issues, and that you have very good grip, hence you can cook etc. Zero points.
No mention of safety.
Likewise have they considered eg pain, repetition etc
Reg 7 have the tribunal considers what happens for the 'majority of days'? If they refer to 'we have considered what happens for the majority of time.' -this is the wrong test.
Have a look at The members guides to check for legal inaccuracies etc.
5. Lastly think about whether you were allowed to give evidence, was the manner of the tribunal brusque, hostile, condescending, rude etc ? What about allowing a break when you asked for one? Maybe the tribunal member fell asleep or was looking at his phone?
Did you feel that you had a fair trial?
This is by no means an exhaustive list but if you identify similar problems then it is likely there is an error of law.
You only need to find one material error. That is to say an error which will make different to the claim. You might find an error that could give an extra two points, but if you were awarded only 2 points the extra 2 points are still insufficient to get you an award.
If you think there is at least one material error the you can apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a set aside and/or leave to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
However it may well be worth seeking out a specialist benefits adviser for detailed advice if you wish to pursue this.
I hope this helps.
LL26
Sorry to hear that you didn't succeed at appeal.
Apply for the Written Statement of reasons (WSOR) and ask for a copy of the record of proceedings- probably a CD. It may take a little while for these to arrive.
In the meantime, try and gather your thoughts about what was said, the manner of the tribunal, did they ask relevant questions etc etc. A good place to start would be about the help seeking behaviour - what do they mean by this?
In order to appeal, you will need to find a material error of law.
Look at the appeal bundle. Listen to the CD match these with comments in the WSOR.
Consider the following:
1. Are there any glaring disparities of evidence, so for example if in the papers and at the hearing you said 'I need help to get on/out of the bath, as I fall over without help ' However the WSOR says 'no difficulties with bathing.' This suggests the tribunal have ignored the evidence.
2. Consider the legal tests - firstly consider the descriptors- so the test for descriptor 1 is to be able to prepare and cook a simple meal for one with fresh ingredients. If the tribunal deny points saying eg 'appellant can always use a microwave to reheat meals his mother makes for him' - this is the wrong legal test- it does not address the test requiring food to be self made from fresh ingredients. Using this example further, if the Tribunal are aware that your mother makes meals there may also be a further error of law if there failure to make proper investigation, if the tribunal don't explore obvious matters.
3. Is there a proper explanation of what's been decided?- eg at paragraph 21 - There is clear medical evidence showing that the claimant struggles to walk, and has been observed by the GP to shuffle along with poor balance. Then later at para 49 the WSOR says 'the assessment states no problems with walking and we consider this evidence to be correct.'
What about the GP evidence? It is ignored and hasn't been explained. Why is the assessment correct?
The tribunal need to ensure they make a proper explanation. There would be no error of law if the tribunal write in para 50. 'We have considered GPS evidence, but it relates to September 2012, and we are aware of surgery since. The assessor carried out a full mobility survey and this was accepted as correct by the claimant.'
4. Think about Regs 7 and 4A. Supposing you have epilepsy, and you have unpredictable fits. On three occasions last month you collapsed unconscious in the kitchen. You were scalded when you knocked over a pan during one fit. The tribunal decide that you have no mental health issues, and that you have very good grip, hence you can cook etc. Zero points.
No mention of safety.
Likewise have they considered eg pain, repetition etc
Reg 7 have the tribunal considers what happens for the 'majority of days'? If they refer to 'we have considered what happens for the majority of time.' -this is the wrong test.
Have a look at The members guides to check for legal inaccuracies etc.
5. Lastly think about whether you were allowed to give evidence, was the manner of the tribunal brusque, hostile, condescending, rude etc ? What about allowing a break when you asked for one? Maybe the tribunal member fell asleep or was looking at his phone?
Did you feel that you had a fair trial?
This is by no means an exhaustive list but if you identify similar problems then it is likely there is an error of law.
You only need to find one material error. That is to say an error which will make different to the claim. You might find an error that could give an extra two points, but if you were awarded only 2 points the extra 2 points are still insufficient to get you an award.
If you think there is at least one material error the you can apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a set aside and/or leave to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
However it may well be worth seeking out a specialist benefits adviser for detailed advice if you wish to pursue this.
I hope this helps.
LL26
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gaddy, Wendy Woo, MDBond, Anji
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MDBond
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 84
8 months 1 week ago #289102 by MDBond
Replied by MDBond on topic Tribunal & Legal Challenges - Flawed PIP Assessment
Thank you Denby, sorry, don't want to needlessly upset anyone on here especially anyone being supportive and kind I really do appreciate the support. I don't know, I'm just really up and down at the moment about this and my sleep is the same. Yes I am trying to keep myself well mentally. I went swimming yesterday and to pilates today and now feel a bit better. It's the first time I've done something 'normal' and gone outside for me in ages.
I'm hoping I find some assistance in real life too, as I will need it if I go for the upper tribunal. Fingers crossed!
I'm hoping I find some assistance in real life too, as I will need it if I go for the upper tribunal. Fingers crossed!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, Gary, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, Chris, David