Proposed benefit changes and substantial risk specifically mental health

Please could someone give me some advice. My understanding was that the Conservatives attempt to remove substantial risk from the WCA was found to be unlawful via the judicial review last December. Does anyone know what is likely to happen regarding substantial risk if the WCA does end in 2028 as proposed? I have read comments saying that those who have LCWRA due to substantial risk will be more likely to be reassessed pending the removal of WCA though I cannot find any information that confirms this. In any case I hope that claimants substantial risk will be protected with whatever changes do happen. This rule is a literal lifeline for those who have a risk to self though suicide. I did read that claimants with substantial risk may well not be allowed PIP in future if deemed a short term condition - along with cancer treatment and high risk pregnancy and as the PIP assessments takes over for the health element payments for LCWRA they would likely not get either payment. It is awful to see vulnerable people being put through all this worry about changes. I am worried sick about it and have very long term complex mental health difficulties.

Thanks in advance if anyone does know anything.

Thank you for your reply and I hope that substantial risk linked to functional descriptors with PIP do protect as many as possible ( as with your example of epilepsy) .

I am very worried regarding substantial risk due to mental health difficulties (self harm / suicide risk) as my psychiatrist has said I have a significant risk of harm to self and will never be fit to work. A recent British Medical Journal article indicated there were 600 additional suicides as a result sickness benefits being more difficult to access due to changes to eligibility around 2013 and it’s predicted the new proposals would have a similar affect. I hope Mind and other charities will stand up to try to help all at substantial risk be that from physical or mental health issues. I believe it is wrong to try to class substantial risk as a category which they seem to be targeting for additional assessments whenever that may occur. I am really frightened and worried about this