× Members

WRAG group no medical

More
13 years 4 months ago #63350 by cdcdi1911
Replied by cdcdi1911 on topic Re:WRAG group no medical
bro58 wrote:

I seem to remember reading other threads on here where people had noted ESA award dates on their letters, I think quite a lot were getting dates of December 2011.

Yes, so did I.

I haven't a clue why claimants get letters stating what their benefit will be until December 2010/2011 but the letter does not actually say that your benefit will either change or that you will be reassessed at this date.

The letters are administrative; I don't think it has anything to do with a review date and ESA rates only change around April.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
13 years 4 months ago #63355 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Re:WRAG group no medical
Derek4 wrote:

bro58 wrote:

I seem to remember reading other threads on here where people had noted ESA award dates on their letters, I think quite a lot were getting dates of December 2011.

Yes, so did I.

I haven't a clue why claimants get letters stating what their benefit will be until December 2010/2011 but the letter does not actually say that your benefit will either change or that you will be reassessed at this date.

The letters are administrative; I don't think it has anything to do with a review date and ESA rates only change around April.



Thanks Derek, and CD,

So in conclusion, If Nada wants an accurate indicator of her expected review date, she needs to request copy of her ESA85a.

Maybe her ESA65 as well?.

cheers

bro58

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #63356 by Crazydiamond
Replied by Crazydiamond on topic Re:WRAG group no medical
bro58 wrote:

Crazydiamond wrote:

It is not a prognosis which is an opinion, based on medical experience of the likely course of a medical condition, but a suggested date when a claimant may be considered fit for a return to work by the ADA, which in my opinion is always based on pure conjecture.

The date in question is normally the date which will be recorded on the ESA85 by the ADA.


Thanks CD,

So am I reading you correctly?, does the OP need to request her ESA85a to find out her prognosis, which would be an indicator of her expected review date?.

Rather than taking the date on her letter, as her expected review date?.

cheers

bro58


If the OP were to request the ESA85, the date on the form should be in line with the date given on the letter, at least it was always the case with IB85s.

Having said this however, the word 'should' is the operative word and if I were in the position of the OP, I would send for the ESA85 anyway as was always my custom with IB85s.

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • nada678
  • Topic Author
13 years 4 months ago #63357 by nada678
Replied by nada678 on topic Re:WRAG group no medical
Hi

My letter doesn't mention a review date - it just says, under the amount I will receive per week, "the amounts on this page apply from August 16 to November 28 2011.

So perhaps this doesn't mean I will be reviewed in November. How can I find out what my review date is?

Thanks

Nada678

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
13 years 4 months ago #63359 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Re:WRAG group no medical
Crazydiamond wrote:

bro58 wrote:

Crazydiamond wrote:

It is not a prognosis which is an opinion, based on medical experience of the likely course of a medical condition, but a suggested date when a claimant may be considered fit for a return to work by the ADA, which in my opinion is always based on pure conjecture.

The date in question is normally the date which will be recorded on the ESA85 by the ADA.


Thanks CD,

So am I reading you correctly?, does the OP need to request her ESA85a to find out her prognosis, which would be an indicator of her expected review date?.

Rather than taking the date on her letter, as her expected review date?.

cheers

bro58


If the OP were to request the ESA85, the date on the form should be in line with the date given on the letter, at least it was always the case with IB85s.

Having said this however, the word 'should' is the operative word and if I were in the position of the OP, I would send for the ESA85 anyway as was always my custom with IB85s.


CD,

Wouldn't it be an ESA85a rather than an ESA85, as no face to face assessment took place.

I gained that info from Derek !!!, he does have some uses !!! LOL.

cheers

bro58

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #63363 by Crazydiamond
Replied by Crazydiamond on topic Re:WRAG group no medical
As far as I am aware, the ESA85A is only used where the support group descriptors (may) apply.

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: bro58GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid