- Posts: 8536
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP and DLA Queries and Results
- PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
× Members
PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
- BIS
- Offline
Less More
2 years 2 months ago #274679 by BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by BIS on topic PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
Hi Merah95
The Tribunal normally looks at a whole claim. How many questions they actually ask you about will be up to them.
BIS
The Tribunal normally looks at a whole claim. How many questions they actually ask you about will be up to them.
BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- merah95
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 10
2 years 2 months ago #274791 by merah95
Replied by merah95 on topic PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
hi
do you know if the DWP will be sending me a 'bundle' in this instance(tribunal due to mh,rj etc)?
do you know if the DWP will be sending me a 'bundle' in this instance(tribunal due to mh,rj etc)?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BIS
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 8536
2 years 2 months ago #274796 by BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by BIS on topic PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
Hi Merah95
The DWP have to send a bundle to the Tribunal Services - and the Tribunal Services will send it to you. This ensures everyone has the same paperwork.
BIS
The DWP have to send a bundle to the Tribunal Services - and the Tribunal Services will send it to you. This ensures everyone has the same paperwork.
BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- merah95
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 10
2 years 2 months ago #274842 by merah95
Replied by merah95 on topic PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
ok thanks.
I've received the bundle now.
do you know, well can you inform me which questions (care activity 1 to 10, and the mobility 1,2) the RJ judgement are concerned with? also is the GMcL and CS v SSWP (PIP) [2017] UKUT 105 (AAC) on the 09/03/2017 with regards to safety is GMcL and CS totally different tribunal decisions? or part of the RJ one?, if they are different which questions are they primarily about.
thanks, in advance.
I've received the bundle now.
do you know, well can you inform me which questions (care activity 1 to 10, and the mobility 1,2) the RJ judgement are concerned with? also is the GMcL and CS v SSWP (PIP) [2017] UKUT 105 (AAC) on the 09/03/2017 with regards to safety is GMcL and CS totally different tribunal decisions? or part of the RJ one?, if they are different which questions are they primarily about.
thanks, in advance.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BIS
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 8536
2 years 2 months ago #274866 by BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by BIS on topic PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
Hi Merah95
The RJ judgement: The DWP agreed that the claimant would be awarded the daily living component of the PIP award (which had previously been denied). There is no information about where the points were scored. The mobility component is about both parts - but the issue is not whether they had mobility issues but the government argued they were not eligible because of age.
RJ, GMcL and CS v SSWP (PIP) [2017] UKUT 105 (AAC) on the 09/03/2017 - is a ruling for three different claimants in the Upper Tribunal where three different claimants were awarded their appeals and their cases were returned to the First Tier Tribunal.
You can read the entire judgement here. The reasons for the appeals are on the first page of the judgement. www.gov.uk/administrative-appeals-tribun...ip-2020-ukut-107-aac
BIS
The RJ judgement: The DWP agreed that the claimant would be awarded the daily living component of the PIP award (which had previously been denied). There is no information about where the points were scored. The mobility component is about both parts - but the issue is not whether they had mobility issues but the government argued they were not eligible because of age.
RJ, GMcL and CS v SSWP (PIP) [2017] UKUT 105 (AAC) on the 09/03/2017 - is a ruling for three different claimants in the Upper Tribunal where three different claimants were awarded their appeals and their cases were returned to the First Tier Tribunal.
You can read the entire judgement here. The reasons for the appeals are on the first page of the judgement. www.gov.uk/administrative-appeals-tribun...ip-2020-ukut-107-aac
BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- merah95
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 10
2 years 2 months ago #274965 by merah95
Replied by merah95 on topic PIP mobility tribunal based on MH ruling (tribunal judgement)
hi
from what i gather the appeal will last 1 hour, do you know if it will be ok if it runs 30-45 minutes late so my appeal meeting will last hour and 45 minutes (I have a lot of information to dredge up) or do they work with strict time limits?, if they do work with strict time limits id have to cut back on what i want to say.
from what i gather the appeal will last 1 hour, do you know if it will be ok if it runs 30-45 minutes late so my appeal meeting will last hour and 45 minutes (I have a lot of information to dredge up) or do they work with strict time limits?, if they do work with strict time limits id have to cut back on what i want to say.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, Gary, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, Chris, David