Mandatory reconsideration decision.

Hi all.
I have read through the provided guides and have a few questions.
My mandatory reconsideration agreed with the orginal flawed assessment.
The decision makers answer has gone into zero explanation on anything. No reasoning for them agreeing with the asseasment over my given evidence, previous evidence and comments other than they do.
They have not even referred to the evidence i sent for MR. It is there fore not even clear if my MR comments or evidence were even read.

I received no phone call only this decision.

I now only have 10 days to submit my tribunal appeal given postage has taken 18 days and i need help with doing so.

The information given on this site suggests the decision makers comments should make it clear all evidence given was looked at and taken into consideration.
It also says i shoukd have had a phone call if this went against me.
Is there any come back for this at all?
And how woudk i go about getting help to organise my tribunal reply.
My MR reply was 36 pages long.
I cannot use that for tribunal but have to condense it somehow.

Thanks

Thanks for the replies on both Gordon,
Its not that i cant use the 36 page MR, i can, but its that everything i have read on here is that the more succinct the tribunal submission, the better, as ultimately the trubunal do not want to read 36 pages. Better to have a succinct submission that highlights main points.
The issue being there are so many main points!
The HP report wafts on about irrelevant factors and fabricates or leaves out relevant testimony. These then sre used to state i do not have issue with certain tasks, when i do.
The main issue is the task and the difficulty i have, but in order to expalin my difficulties, i then feel i have to explain what the fabrications of the HP were, what was blatantly ommitted and how it all ties in to my difficulties being ignored by the HP and decision maker.
This is for near on every one of the tasks, hence why so long.

Sorry Gordon i do not follow what you mean.

Were you asking in case i did not have a copy, thinking thats why I could not use the MR?

If the tribunal will get the 36 pages and definately review it from DWP anyway, is it not worth starting the appeal to tribunal with something more streamlined?

I can always submit the 36 pages anyway if DWP "mislaid" it and did not add it into their evidence bundle, stating it "wasnt received" or something like that. Ive got the postage receipt and name of person who signed for it so that shouodnt be an issue.