Mandatory reconsideration decision.

I see.
Then i think the 36 page MR did that.
I went through what issues there were with the decisikn makers decision
then what issues were in the assessors report.
I then laid out each task and what i was awaeded in the past, what i was awarded at review and what i thought it should be.

Is there a way i could get someone to review this and tell me if i need to amend in any way?

Ive finally gotten theough to the CAB, who have no funding for benefit agents. They sent me to the council, who obviously do not deal with it. So i am back to square one in regards to not knowing if i am missing this out or doing things wrong.

Thank you BIS.
After a frantic few days of calling eveyone i can think of to help within a 50 mile radius of the house, i have now found someone who will represent me at tribunal.
I realise i am not a rare case, but i knownthe odds of me being well enough to be able to turn up on the day are slim, let alone having the cognition to represent myself, hence why i feel i need support. On top of lacking ability to work to tight deadlines with conditions that dont play ball, especially when stressed.

I have been told to resumbmit the 36pages as my tribunal appeal just as you all say, and know that i then have the submission in on time.

Thanks again

I'm not an expert, just a (partly) successful PIP claimant!
I discovered, too late, that my S.I.L was employed for many years by the CAB to present at tribunals, for claimants.
She pointed out that tribunals are expensive, but not to you. They cost thousands. The Tribunals don't resist for the hell of it, which the assessors seem to. If you read some of the Upper Tribunals' comments in the case law records (via Pipinfo.net) you'll see they can be scathing about the lower judgments - something not read, or something not replied to, makes them go round again, which they obviously find annoying. I (accidentally) called the tribunal service, and chatted for a while. Lady said it was much more rigorous than the assessor stages, and it was common for things to go round and round. All free to you, remember. So if you don't get sensible answers, I'd make it clear you will push on.

If you can give a compelling statement from a/(some) health professional(s), such as, just as an example: "This patient is not safe to try to walk 20m as they are liable to fall, as they have done causing injury", from your GP, then the Mobility part is case closed. They wouldn't need to read any more because you're going to win! Time saved!
It could be argued that someone like a GP might not know enough about how you manage some things at home, but a statement like the one above ( to the assessors) got me higher rate Mobility, quickly.

I was also short of time (as you were) because they post so slowly, so I phoned them (it was actually AFTER the deadline had passed) and said I was getting a medical report, which would maybe take a couple of weeks, what with comms to and from the GP. I didn't quite have it by the time they called to chase it, so were quite happy to wait another week for it. Don't be rushed, call them!