× Members

Transitional payment protection decreased after awarded LCWRA

More
3 weeks 4 days ago #311737 by Karen24
Hi David,

Thank you for the information.

Strangely, I had a message to read in my journal today, which I enclose.
“ Hello Karen, I wish to apologise for the delay in getting back to you. I am a decision maker and I looked at your mandatory reconsideration request. However, the query or questions you have are not needed for a mandatory reconsideration, I have asked your case manager to explain it further to you. BUT if you do not agree with them then you can request a mandatory reconsideration and will be answered accordingly”

Which I’m none the wiser on.

I received an email from the area managers department, asking me to confirm my address, phone number etc, so hopefully I will have a decision soon. I will keep you updated.

Thanks
Karen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
3 weeks 3 days ago #311761 by Karen24
Hi David,
I have received an email today from Mike Pages office.

Saying that, he has contacted colleagues across a range of services including the complaints team, Service Centre and Decision Makers to ensure the matter is dealt with and any corrections are made to my claim if required and full explanations provided.
Also that, they have been advised that my case manager will be in contact with me (either by letter or via my journal) explaining the current circumstances of my claim and payment break downs. The complaints team will also be in touch with me to address my complaint in full.

I have now received a journal message from one of the Resolution Managers, apologising that I’m not happy with the situation and service I’ve experienced. He had been passed the complaint to review and is in the process of investigating it along with the points I had raised, and will be replying in full to the Complaints Resolution Team as soon as he can.

I can’t thank you enough for the advice and contact details for Mike Page, this has definitely moved things on, whereas I could have been left in limbo for months still.
Hopefully I will hear soon, as to whether my payments will be reinstated to the internal guidance notes, and also whether the money they took off will be reimbursed.

Thanks

Karen
The following user(s) said Thank You: latetrain

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
3 weeks 2 days ago #311771 by latetrain
Hi Karen24

Thank you for the update, we are pleased that the information David gave you was useful.

Gary

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Karen24

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 weeks 1 day ago #311966 by Karen24
Good morning David,

I wanted to give you an update on what we previously spoke about.
Yesterday I received a message via my journal, which I enclose:


“Sorry I have not responded earlier.
I have reviewed your claim, as requested by National Complaints.
I have emailed the local migration team to check over your claim and check the migration process.
They are aware of the court case you have referred, but as yet a fix on the UC system has not been put in place.
I have been told of the current work around and as such I have sent an email asking for an escalation on the outstanding Mandatory Reconsideration.
I can assure you I am working as quickly as I can to give you the answers to your complaint and hopefully fix this issue for you.
When I have more information I will inform you via the journal.”

As a fix has not yet been put on the UC system, do you think I should email Mike Page again?

I feel like I’m going to be left yet again.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Karen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 week 6 days ago #311997 by David
Hi Karen

Personally I would be content with the fact that a senior case manager is attending to the issue which involves making consistent changes to the complicated UC Build IT system. The internal UC staff guidance states :-
At present the UC system cannot manage this automatically. The intention is to have the
system updated and to change the Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations
2014 so that operationally and legally everything aligns. Then, once aligned, to go back and attempt to deal with all the cases from 29/01/25 onwards (i.e. where the LCWRA Element was awarded on or after that date) that would benefit from the MJ decision.

Mike Page and staff act as gatekeepers and forward complaints to the respective Team Leaders. There would be no point in contacting him until the notification of a final decision.
A lot of Forum members have received substantial back payments following DWP errors but have had to wait for these to materialise.
If you had gone down the route of a Benefits Tribunal the matter would not have been heard for around 12 months.

Let me know how things progress with this.

David

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 week 4 days ago #312017 by Karen24
Hi David,
Thank you for reply and advice.

I’m just thankful that somehow I came across the court case , and posted on here. If I hadn’t I’d have been none the wiser to query it.
Sounds like it could take some time still, but looks like a promising outcome eventually.

I would never have known about Mike Page either if it wasn’t for yourself.
This has helped me to be heard and taken notice of.
As and when I get notification of a final decision I will let him know, likewise with yourself.

Thank you

Karen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonlatetrainBISCatherine12345ChrisDavidKeelyJasmine