Is there any case law or has anyone had any tribunal decisions which clarify whether this descriptor should be interpreted as either standing for 30 mins/1 hr or sitting for 30 mins/1 hr OR alternating between the two?
I am aware of a lower tribunal decision that treated the two as seperate, however, this does not set a precedent. ATOS guidance clearly treats the the two a being part of the same descriptor, see the WCA Handbook, section 3.2.3.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.
