× Members

ESA Tribunal - Schedule 3 descriptors

  • Aslan
  • Topic Author
12 years 7 months ago - 12 years 7 months ago #88222 by Aslan
I’m not sure that my ESA Tribunal was conducted legally correctly. I was appealing to be moved from the Work-Related Activity Group to the Support Group. I appealed under the exceptional circumstances rule, and had stated in my appeal letter that:

I believe there would be a substantial risk to my mental health if I were found not to have limited capability for work-related activity.

However, at the Tribunal, the Solicitor/Judge made repeated references to Schedule 3 descriptors, without clarifying what this meant, (and my advocate wasn’t clear on this either, being new to the job). I lost the Tribunal because ‘No descriptors were satisfied under Schedule 3 regulations.’

I now know that Schedule 2 is ASSESSMENT OF WHETHER A CLAIMANT HAS LIMITED CAPABILITY FOR WORK and Schedule 3 is ASSESSMENT OF WHETHER A CLAIMANT HAS LIMITED CAPABILITY FOR WORK-RELATED ACTIVITY. I think on your website you call them ‘Support Group Descriptors’. (Cannot find a reference to Schedule 3 specifically.)

I had thought that exceptional circumstances were those which did not specifically relate to these descriptors? Can anyone please clarify this?

I would hate anyone else to 'fall foul' because they are bombarded with 'legalise'!
Last edit: 12 years 7 months ago by Gordon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 7 months ago #88225 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic Re:ESA Tribunal - Schedule 3 descriptors
Aslan

You are correct in thinking that Schedule 3 refers to the Support Group descriptors, this and Schedule 2 were/are attached to the original ESA Regulations 2008.

When the ESA descriptors were updated in 2011, the replacement legislation refers also refers to Schedule 2 and 3.

With regard to being placed in the SG under the Exceptional Circumstances, this is covered under Regulation 35 and not either of the Schedules.

With regard to your hearing, as you have a representative, in the first instance you should speak to them with regard to challenging the panels Decision, however there are rules for you doing this.

What is an Error of Law?

The first part of the process is to request a Statement of Reasons

Tribunals – Requesting a Statement of Reasons

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 7 months ago #88226 by slugsta
Replied by slugsta on topic Re:ESA Tribunal - Schedule 3 descriptors
As you have found, working out whether something was, or was not, an 'error of law' is beyind the scope of most laymen. I would advise you to take specialist advice regarding this.


What is an error of law?



Where to get advice


You will need to get a Statement of Reasons from the Tribunal service


Tribunals – requesting a statement of reasons

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.