- Posts: 51287
Appeal Submission - WRAG to SG
- Gordon
- Offline
Ortho Tortoise wrote: Further query re appeal submission. I am appealing on the grounds that I meet one or more of the SG descriptors and using exceptional circumstances as a back up. I also feel that I was not a 'Notified Person' as per the regulations, my conversion process started January 2012. I would rather win my appeal on medical grounds and not on a technicality which would mean me going through the whole process again, if they accepted this argument, so I was not going to deal with the conversion letter issue in the appeal.
Question, If I lost the appeal, could I still raise the conversion letter issue or does the fact that I have not mentioned it in my initial appeal mean I cannot raise it later?
Many Thanks
As far as I am aware, there have only been a handful of successful appeal based on a failure to notify and all of those have been handled by experienced Welfare Rights officers.
I am not saying that a claimant could not successfully pursue this matter, but I am dubious.
So, I do not think that we are qualified to advise on whether there would be the option to launch a further appeal on this basis. You should be aware that such an argument does have the potential to undermine your existing WRAG placement, as this is predicated on your having been transferred properly in the first place.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ortho Tortoise
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 19
Would the reverse ever happen, ie. they phone to tell you that you have been unsuccessful without actually seeing you? I did request an oral hearing.
I only scored 15 points from 2 descriptors, Mobilising and sitting/standing whereas I felt my score should have been more like 42 from 4 descriptors, have also got upper limb problems. Will the Tribunal look at everything or stop once they feel that I meet one of the SG descriptors?
Many thanks once again for all your invaluable advice.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bro58
Ortho Tortoise wrote: I have got my appeal next Monday, have read a few times on the forum that the Tribunal can telephone you on the morning or the day before to say you need not attend as your appeal has been successful.
Would the reverse ever happen, ie. they phone to tell you that you have been unsuccessful without actually seeing you? I did request an oral hearing.
I only scored 15 points from 2 descriptors, Mobilising and sitting/standing whereas I felt my score should have been more like 42 from 4 descriptors, have also got upper limb problems. Will the Tribunal look at everything or stop once they feel that I meet one of the SG descriptors?
Many thanks once again for all your invaluable advice.
Hi OT,
No, The Tribunal cannot find against you without you having a hearing, in these circumstances.
You do mention that you feel that you should have scored "more like 42 points". However, remember that The SG Descriptors are not points based, even though some of them correspond to The WRAG descriptors that score the maximum 15 points.
It is theorectically possible to score over a 100 points and still only be placed in The WRAG, but they generally stop when you have reached the minimum requirement of 15 points for WRAG entry.
Tribunals also generally "stop" once they feel that you have met the threshold of qualifying for The SG, with respect to Schedule 3, or Exceptional Circumstances, Reg 35.
See : Qualifying for the WRAG
WRAG (LCW) Descriptors
&
Qualifying for the Support Group
SG (LCWRA) Descriptors
Good luck, and please let us know how you get on.
bro58
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ortho Tortoise
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 19
My concern was more that some of my medical conditions were ignored by the HCP particularly those relating to my upper limb problems and the assessment as a result was full of ommissions and inaccuracies and did not reflect my difficulties. I would not wish that flawed report (IMO) be on record and possibly be used in the future.
I will have to see how things go on Monday and I will certainly return to the forum and let you know the outcome.
Many Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bro58
Ortho Tortoise wrote: Thanks for the information Bro 58. I do realise that SG is not points based.
My concern was more that some of my medical conditions were ignored by the HCP particularly those relating to my upper limb problems and the assessment as a result was full of ommissions and inaccuracies and did not reflect my difficulties. I would not wish that flawed report (IMO) be on record and possibly be used in the future.
I will have to see how things go on Monday and I will certainly return to the forum and let you know the outcome.
Many Thanks
Hi OT,
You can point out to The Tribunal that you feel that ATOS have failed to take some of your medical conditions into account in their assessment.
As previously stated though, this seems to be the norm, and it can make it that much harder to appeal an adverse decision.
It is what I call "Production Line Assessments" unfortunately, many members have had the same experience.
This video may help to ease any concerns that you may have, it "should" be quite informal. Of course, it would be normal for any one to suffer some nervousness

MOJ Video of ESA Appeals Process and Tribunal
bro58
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Derekq
- Offline
- Posts: 111
Been following the thread ... just wanted to wish you the very best for Monday, you sound well prepaired.
GOOD LUCK.
Regards, Derek
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.