Labour’s proposed new personal independence payment (PIP) 4-point rule will lead to almost nine out of ten current standard daily living awards failing on renewal, a freedom of information request has revealed.  In effect, Labour are hiding the virtual abolition of the standard rate behind a seemingly small change to the scoring system.

Labour intends to remove the daily living component from claimants who do not score 4 points or higher for at least one activity, when their PIP award is reviewed from November 2026.

The department have now revealed the proportion of current claimants who would lose out under this rule, as of January 2025:

  • Out of 1,608,000 enhanced daily living awards, 13% (209,000) get fewer than 4 points in all activities.
  • Out of 1,283,000 standard daily living awards, 87% (1,116,000) get fewer than 4 points in all activities.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has suggested that the number of claimants who will lose their awards will not be as high as the 1,325,250 that these figures suggest.

Instead, they argue that the actual number will be 800,000 because people will fight harder to be awarded a 4-point descriptor, including by challenging decisions.

At Benefits and Work, we think that the OBR are being much too optimistic in arguing that over half a million claimants will be able to increase their scores, because:

  • there are very limited opportunities to get four point descriptors for claimants, especially with some conditions,
  • the standard of assessments is very poor in many cases and there is a lack of understanding of many conditions,
  • the mandatory revisions and appeals process is very long-drawn out and demanding and there is very little support available for claimants whose health conditions may limit their ability to pursue an appeal.

Whatever the final number might be, there will be vastly fewer standard rate daily living awards by the time all current awards have been reviewed. And very few new claims from November 2026 will lead to an award of the standard rate daily living component.

We know that Labour plan to scrap the work capability assessment in 2028 and replace it with a new, single assessment for PIP and the UC health element. 

It now seems entirely possible that they are preparing the ground for the complete abolition of the standard rate of the daily living component altogether for new claims, when the combined assessment is introduced.

You can read the full FoI response here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Of course most fail. That's why the new test was brought in. Rather than do more to help those unemployed & in good health, this government pursues highly immoral policies which punish the easy targets & the vulnerable to pander to the unthinking mob & RW media. It's bound to cost them dearly come the next GE. There are no moral grounds to strip financial support from those suffering chronic ill-health & who are largely unemployable in any economic climate, let alone one of  rising costs. The Tory cutbacks initiated by IDS directly cost some people their lives. That's verifiable fact. So will Starmer's Labour. All so avoidable if only we had people of integrity & principle in government. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    It's just proposals that will get stopped and people could write open letters to reform aswell to tell them how much they'll be fought if they do cut support if they win next election farage is another one that doesn't like disabled people .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    I don't trust them not to go further either. I currently get EDL because I get 8 points in one of the few MH related categories and 2 points for prompting in several others. Reading between the lines of their arguments so far I find it probable that they will scrap the prompting score entirely. That will leave me entirely reliant on the single category remaining to keep not only SDL but LCWRA. If they decide that we must tick more than one category or if they reduce the points in that remaining category or - most likely - I get a bad assessment and lose the 8 points, I am doomed. I cannot survive on basic UC, I cannot tolerate ANY forced contact with work coaches and I would not survive the many months in would take to appeal. My MH is already in crisis at the prospect of all this, if it actually happened I would lose my remaining grip, and be gone.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    My renewal date is Sept 2026. 
    Lucky me. I'm sure they will conveniently push the new rules on me one way or another. 
    Absolutely done up like a kipper. 
    The four points might as well be 104 points. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Thank you, B&W, for all your much appreciated work.


    This clip says it all. Politicians in America brutalizing those on benefits. Kicking those below as you climb the greasy pole seems to have become humanity’s favourite international sport.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    This is the killer, literally in some cases: 

    "the mandatory revisions and appeals process is very long-drawn out and demanding and there is very little support available for claimants whose health conditions may limit their ability to pursue an appeal"

    I pursued an appeal over 3 years for someone who was eventually awarded standard daily living but no mobility, when they should have got the higher mobility. It was a big payment backdated for the three years and a shed load more than the nothing originally offered, nonetheless only about half what I knew was owed. I just didn't have the stamina to take it further and I feared that because of the "lack of understanding of many conditions" there was a high likelihood we'd fail because the evidence would not be accepted.

    This is what the dwp and government rely on - our lack of wherewithal to fight. They must be rubbing their hands when they see the statistics, though they might have underestimated our desperate strength when backed into a corner.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Yes, the OBR's forecast that so many people will successfully gain 4 points by 'fighting' harder is deluded. It's almost like no one in the OBR has even met a person who claims PIP. Yes, people will try for 4 points in order to survive, but you have to fight tooth and nail as it is for even significant disability to be recognised and supported.
    Mr Timms has not so far responded to my email. Perhaps he wasn't flattered by it. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Thank you; utterly depressing, and oh so predictable.  And neither Reform or the Tories will repeal this.  Effectively, we are going back to pre-1992 (when DLA was introduced).  At least I'll get the mobility component but it's a hell of a cut in my standard of living. Combined with wage suppression at work and the lack of promotions (which I have already mentioned to the Head of HR, so will be expecting my P45 sometime soon!) means that it's going to be very grim from around 2029 (my renewal date is 2030 but expect that to be brought forward).

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.