The Conservatives have launched a renewed campaign against disabled claimants, echoing Labour policies. Kemi Badenoch claimed yesterday that it was time to “draw a line on what health issues the state can support people with”, particularly targeting “low level mental health issues”, such as  “being diagnosed with anxiety which can be worth more than £20,000 to some families.” 

Badenoch set the tone in the opening remarks of her speech, arguing that “Rachel Reeves hiked taxes by £26 billion to pay for a welfare splurge, penalising people who work hard and making them pay for those who don't work at all.”

She went on to claim:  “Labour’s Budget was for Benefits Street.

“They send a very clear message.

“If you work hard, and do the right thing, you will get less.

“And if you are on benefits, you will get more.

“Right now, in Britain there are more than 6 million working-age people claiming benefits instead of working.

“That’s more than the entire population of Norway.

“Who we are paying to sit at home.”

The figure of over 6 million can only be reached by including all those universal credit claimants who have been found to be unable to work or prepare for work.

The Conservative leader went on to say that she, Mel Stride, Andrew Griffith and Helen Whately would spend the next year figuring out how to get more people into work and cut the benefits bill.

“We will undertake a full review of the level and operation of the Household Benefit cap, which currently acts more like a sieve than a cap because most people on benefits avoid it through one exemption or another.

“Exemptions like being diagnosed with anxiety which can be worth more than £20,000 to some families.”

They will also “review which conditions the state treats as disabilities when it comes to benefits.

“All of us will have physical and mental challenges at some point in our lives.

“But in an age in which one in four people now self-report as disabled, it’s clear that we are now going to have to draw a line on what health issues the state can support people with.”

Badenoch claimed that her team had already identified £23 billion in savings by measuring such as restricting benefits to British citizens and “Reducing eligibility for low level mental health issues.”

At present, the possibility of the Conservatives winning power at the next election seems remote.  But a minority Reform UK government propped up by a much reduced Tory party may be real possibility.

However, the most immediate danger is the fact that Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK are increasingly coming together in arguing that mental health issues, in particular, are being overdiagnosed and that benefits should not be given to those with “low level” conditions. 

It is an argument which, if won, could easily be extended to many physical health conditions, ushering in a new four-point PIP system by the back door.

With Streeting’s rushed review into overdiagnosis of mental health and neurodivergent conditions due to report in the summer, we hope this is a battle that disability charities are already preparing to fight.

You can read the full text of Badenoch’s speech here

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 minutes ago
    It's weird I've never met anyone, myself included who wants to claim anything more than the bare minimum to live on mainly because the idea of having to deal more with the DWP is deeply traumatic. I don't know if I could qualify for pip or not but since I can just about manage with lcwra I'm not even gonna look! Often when I get the yearly letter about the inflation rate level increase in money I think I'd rather they kept the money and didn't give me the utter terror of having to open an envelope from them
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 minutes ago
    Labour, the Tories and Reform are increasingly indistinguishable. The severity of the rhetoric may vary, but you don't have to read between the lines much to see that in terms of policy all three parties are converging on the same toxic agenda. A vote for any of these parties is now unthinkable. We need the Greens and other parties to the left of Labour to do as well as possible in the May elections.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 39 minutes ago
    Kemi Badenoch's speech also:

    Dog whistled nationalists. Saying due to benefits and taxation other nations will overtake the UK.

    Dog whistled racists. Singling out Hackney an area where White British are only 36% of the population. As having lots of large families who benefit from removing the two child benefit cap. And that 300,000 hard working taxpayers across the UK are having to pay just for the large families in Hackney. And that hard working taxpayers are unable to afford to have children. Then going on about multigenerational worklessness, the rising number of workless household, and worrying about what the UK will look like in four years. In a different part of her speech repeated Tory policy of removing benefit eligibility from non UK nationals.

    One issue Benefits and Works News seems to not mention much is the targeting of non UK nationals, including those with indefinite leave to remain. It is now Reform and Tory policy to remove benefit eligibility from them, and Labour are looking at doing the same. Those who are EU immigrants with settled status under the Brexit treaty should be unaffected due to the terms of the treaty and wanting to maintain good relations with the EU. And those whose only benefit is state pension might be unaffected due to media backlash as least if the pensioners are living in the UK. But they are all still talking about a cut of billions of pounds of benefits spending.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 44 minutes ago
    Kemi Badenoch get Britain working speech.

    Used the misleading stat of a increase of a million people claiming UC without mentioning that it is due in part to people being transferred from other benefits to UC not just new claims.

    Went on about people should not get benefits for anxiety. And how overly generous benefits are. Went on about too many people being diagnosed with mental and physical health conditions. To audience laughter and cries of here, here.

    Wants to look at all health conditions and make many no longer considered disabilities/illnesses in regards to benefits eligibility.

    Want most disabled/ill people to get help into work rather than cash disability/incapacity benefits.

    Wants to look at time limiting disability benefits. On the basis they should get a job.

    Wants to reform the household benefit cap so less households with disabilities are exempt.
    Wants to look at all cases where households on benefits get more than workers.

    Wants to change how poverty is measured so it does not use relative income.

    So in effect wants to extend what Labour wants to do with ADHD, Autism and mental health conditions to all health conditions. And in addition to removing eligibility for some health conditions, wants to time limit disability/incapacity benefits for some more (as previously done with LCW), and look at reducing benefits for most of the rest (as previously done with abolishing low rate care component when DLA was replaced with PIP, abolishing the independent living fund, abolishing the severe disability premium when income based ESA was replaced by UC, abolishing the LCW premium, cutting LCWRA premium for new claimants). While also changing how poverty is measured. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    As much as I hate this new Labour after what they did  at least they have sympathetic back benches to vote all this down won’t get that with a reform Tory coalition not with Lee Anderson in charge of dwp if that was the case then so called mild anxiety will definitely be gone i reckon the Green Party is going to do well your party has potential but they seem to keep arguing 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 minutes ago
      @Brian I do not share your confidence that Labour backbenchers will stop Starmer and friends planned cuts to benefits. It looks to me like they have already done a deal with many of them. Removing the two child benefit cap in return for not voting against cuts to disability. And that future deals maybe done around specific disabilities and illnesses that are personal causes due to family or friends of MPs or are likely to have media sympathy. And that increased protection for the small number of ill and disabled who are deemed truly deserving and possibly a benefit increase for them maybe part of the deal made to cut disability benefits for the rest. At best I think the government might be forced reluctantly to protect all existing claimants and only make changes to new claimants, but that seems unlikely.   

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.