Benefits and Work is asking readers to contact local councillors in order to get them to grill your MP about the effects Green Paper cuts will have on local services.

Because the cuts proposed by Labour won’t just hurt a huge number of claimants. What the DWP is doing is shifting some of the cost of disability from central government to local authorities and the NHS, with no suggestion that they’ll be increasing their funding to meet these costs. 

The result will be overstretched services, longer waiting lists and cuts to less-essential services.

Areas such as care services, housing, health services, advice services and education will all be hit and everyone will be worse off as a result.

So, we think it’s time local councillors started to put real pressure on MPs who have not yet said they will vote against the cuts, to say how they expect local authorities to manage the additional demands.

We think this is an issue that makes it reasonable not just to contact your ward councillor, so we are suggesting you email a selection of your local councillors from different parties, as well as independents.  You should find contact details for all councillors on your local authority website. 

The letter could cover some of the following points, though of course you can reword it in any way you choose, perhaps to include references that are specific to your locality.

[Your name and address to prove you are local]

Dear [name of councillor],

I am writing to express my concern about the effects that the proposed Green Paper benefits cuts will have on local services and to ask you to discuss this with our constituency MP.

According to official estimates, 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty by the Green Paper cuts and 700,000 will be pushed into deeper poverty.  There are no official figures on how many people might move into work due to Green paper changes, but the Resolution Foundation has estimated between 60,000 and 105,000 by the end of this parliament.

This means that, at the very least, it is likely that 845,000 people will be pushed into poverty or deeper poverty without being able to find work and some of these will be living in our constituency.

If our MP is considering voting in favour of the cuts, it’s important that they explain how the local authority will deal with the extra strain on its resources, including those listed below, that the cuts will bring.

Increased demand for adult social care

150,000 people are expected to lose their award of carer’s allowance because the person they care for has lost their PIP award.  Many carers will have to seek full-time paid employment to make up for this massive loss of household income. This will lead to an increased demand for care provision from the local authority as well as access to day centres, lunch clubs and transport services.  There is also likely to be an increased demand for aids and adaptations to people’s homes.

Increased demands on mental health services. 

There is already evidence of claimants living with mental health issues experiencing a deterioration in their condition due to anxiety about the cuts. (DWP leaflets given to participants at in-person Green Paper consultation events included contact details for the Samaritans). If the PIP cuts go through, many claimants – even those with a 4 point descriptor - will experience an increase in anxiety just waiting for their turn to be assessed.  For those who actually lose their PIP, and are obliged to attempt the extremely arduous reconsideration and appeals process to try to get it back, the effects may be dramatically worse.  In addition, PIP often pays for counselling and other forms of therapy which help keep conditions manageable.  So, there is likely to be increased pressure on local mental health services and an increase in costly emergency interventions.

Increased demands on other health services

The majority of people who will lose their PIP award will be older and live with physical health conditions such as arthritis, diabetes, heart conditions and respiratory conditions. With households losing up to £12,000 in annual income, there will be a considerable increase in people coping with poor nutrition, loss of special diet, cold and damp living conditions, social isolation, anxiety and more. All of these are likely to cause a deterioration in both physical and mental health conditions and an increase in demand for GP and other health services .

Increased demand for housing support

Many claimants depend on PIP to make up the shortfall in their rent.  In addition, some claimants who lose their PIP will find themselves subject to the benefits cap and unable to afford their rent for that reason.  It is extremely likely that an increased number of disabled people will face homelessness and require support from their local authority as a result of Green paper cuts.

Increased demand on schools

There is a wealth of evidence that children living in poverty are less likely to achieve at school.  Breakfast clubs and free lunches may alleviate some of their hunger, but overcrowded and substandard housing, lack of online access and lack of money for additional activities can all hold children back and increase demands on teachers.  The Green paper cuts are predicted to plunge at least 50,000 children into poverty and reduce their life chances.  Some of those children will be in our constituency.

Increased demand for advice services

There will be a large increase in demand for advice on debt, housing and welfare benefits in particular.  Local agencies may be overwhelmed and are likely to need increased funding to provide an effective service.

Given all the above – and there are probably other costs I have not considered - it seems certain that the Green Paper cuts will have a real and damaging effect on our local budget.  

We hope that you will challenge our MP to give serious consideration to all these matters before they decide how to vote.

Best regards,

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Thanks benefits and work I have sent this to my local councillor who is against the green paper benefits cuts. 👍
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    B & W - It's happened again - this time I copied my post!!!

    Well short!

    I had put together what for me was an essay with well argued points.

    The end umpteen paragraphs have gone as well as a lot of word after - "despite winning the vote "

    What I posted now makes no sense.

    Will you have a look round the floor in your office for the rest of my words please?

    I am now too knackered to start again!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Well, I for one, have a glass that is 3 quarters full rather than a quarter empty!

    Labour has U-turned on the WFA policy that was enacted almost a year ago and that caused them a lot of pain on the doorstep - despite winning the vote 
    I suggest that the same will be true of the receipts that they would have got from the benefits green paper. Both amounts are relatively small n the scheme of things.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 57 minutes ago
      @Yorkie Bard I think a couple of my posts have gone missing too

      A lot of comments today seem very deflated and resigned to the worst happening - and it doesn’t take much for hopelessness to spread around disabled community online

      Pensioners got their u turn but they had to wait a good number of months to get it (the cuts were announced sept 2024 - so 8 months) - same amount of time between the 2 child limit vote in commons last sept and recent concessions in free school lunches

      The green paper leaks and announcements didn’t happen till feb/march 2025 - only 3 or so months ago

      So if you compare timings It’s not unexpected ministers are holding their ground for now - going by the above the disabled community would need to keep anger and pressure up till at least sept-nov which may be the point concessions & u turns may be on the table

      Even if the gov wins a vote in the meantime we can’t give up and accept that it’s a done deal and accept life becoming more unbearable.

      Even if Labour win the upcoming vote - that’s only the battle, not the war

      Public backlash can trigger u turns of even fully passed bills and we don’t know what legal cases could occur if the gov manages to progress this bill forward

      But it’s worrying to read so many comments of ppl giving up

      It’s still very early days - and neither side can claim they are anywhere close to success - no outcome is off the table yet
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Yorkie Bard Yorkie Bard Try this in future:

      Highlight and cut your post (especially a long one) after composing. Paste it back. Post it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Yorkie Bard B & W - once again my post has been cut short on posting.

      Well short!

       I had put together what for me was an essay  with well argued points. 

      The end umpteen paragraphs have gone as well as a lot of word after - "despite winning the vote "

      What I posted now makes no sense.

      Will you have a look round the floor in your office for the rest of my words please?

       I am now too knackered to start again!


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I’m not pulling any punches because if they don’t look after disabled people properly and it’s many thousands that become unable to survive or die it is that stark. They will have to not only live with it but possibly suffer because of it how would you sleep at night. It will be much worse than the Post Office scandal. So if there’s anything the government is keeping from us about the cuts That might make them fair and not as damning as Timms suggests now is a the time to speak. It’s absolutely insane. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    It's not looking good when we are advised to contact local councils....so it's going to be receipts/vouchers for most of those who currently receive PIP. Interestingly, my 'review' is not until after the next GE although I dread to think of the composition of the next Govt (it won't be Labour on its own, probably a coalition of some sort).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Here's the letter wriiten and send to all three of my local councillord

    [Your Full Name]
    [Your Address Line 1]
    [Your Address Line 2]
    [Postcode]

    Email: [your.email@example.com]

    [Date]


    Councillor [Name]
    #[Council Offices]
    #[Street Name]
    #[Town/City]
    #[Postcode]

    Email: [councillor.email@example.com]

    Dear Councillor [Surname],

    I’m writing as a resident of ##### to express my deep concern about the changes proposed in the Government’s Green Paper on disability benefits, and to ask that you raise this matter with our constituency MP as a matter of urgency.

    These proposals are already having a damaging effect on the mental and physical health of disabled people and unpaid carers across the country, and the full consequences will soon be felt here in #####. Government estimates suggest that up to 845,000 people will be pushed into poverty or deeper poverty, while only a very small number might realistically move into work. That is a gross imbalance.

    This is not a policy about opportunity or inclusion. It is a cold, calculated cost-cutting exercise targeting the most vulnerable people in our society. The burden — financial, practical and moral — will be quietly transferred to local councils like #####, to the NHS, to schools, charities and ultimately, to residents.

    Let’s be honest: we all know why these cuts are being proposed. They are not driven by evidence or compassion, but by a desire to save money on spurious grounds. They are poorly judged, and are being implemented with all the finesse of a hammer. I am unaware of any promise of extra funding to help local authorities absorb the consequences — just an expectation that councils will somehow “manage”.

    As someone who lives with the reality of disability and its associated bureaucracy, I can tell you that the system is already grinding people down. These cuts will make it far worse. And they will generate a tidal wave of new demand across several areas:

    • Adult Social Care: Independent assessment expects around 150,000 unpaid carers to lose their Carer’s Allowance because the person they care for will lose PIP. Many of these carers will be forced to seek alternative work, leaving vulnerable people without support. This will increase demand on council-managed care services, day centres and transport schemes. It’s worth remembering that unpaid carers already save the UK economy an estimated £162 billion a year — more than the entire NHS budget. Is this how we reward them?

    • Mental Health Services: There is already growing anxiety among claimants. At recent DWP consultation events, the department itself handed out contact details for the Samaritans — which says everything. The PIP reassessment process causes enormous stress, and losing the award often means people can no longer afford therapy or activities that help keep their conditions stable. Local mental health services will bear the brunt.

    • Healthcare: Many who stand to lose PIP are older people with conditions such as arthritis, diabetes, heart or lung problems. Without PIP, they may no longer be able to afford nutritious meals, keep their homes warm, or travel to appointments. This will inevitably lead to increased GP visits, hospital admissions, and avoidable deterioration in health.

    • Housing and Homelessness: PIP often helps people cover gaps in their rent where Housing Benefit falls short. Without it, many will fall foul of the benefit cap, leading to evictions, arrears and homelessness. The strain this will place on #####’s housing support teams and temporary accommodation provision will be immense.

    • Education: At least 50,000 children are expected to fall into poverty due to these changes. We know poverty affects educational attainment, behaviour and mental wellbeing. Schools in #####, already stretched, will be forced to pick up more responsibility for pupils affected by hunger, overcrowding, digital exclusion, and emotional distress.

    • Advice Services: Local advice centres and council teams will be overwhelmed with people facing eviction, appealing PIP decisions, or trying to understand how they’re expected to survive. Without additional funding, the quality and accessibility of these services will inevitably decline.
    None of this is speculation — it’s entirely foreseeable. These measures will not only fail to reduce need, they will increase suffering and end up costing far more in the long run.

    That’s why I’m asking you, as one of my local councillors, to speak out and challenge our MP. If they support these changes, they should explain how ##### is expected to manage the consequences with no new resources. If they oppose them, they must do so publicly and be seen to stand up for constituents who are about to be placed in very real danger.

    This isn’t a party-political issue — it’s about basic decency. It’s about whether we treat disabled people and carers as citizens worthy of support, or as burdens to be quietly cut adrift.
    For many, PIP is a lifeline. If it is removed, they won’t just suffer in silence — they will turn to the council, the NHS, voluntary organisations and elected representatives like yourself, hoping someone will hear them.

    I hope you will be that voice — and I would be grateful if you could let me know whether you intend to raise this matter with our MP.

    Thank you for your time and for your continued service to the community.

    Yours sincerely,
    [Your Name]

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Does anyone think the same as me ( trying not to sound pessimistic) that the sudden announcement yesterday of extra cash for schools probably means Reeves is sure the benefit cuts will go through?
    It is important to provide more for schools and education but l can’t help cynically wondering how it’s being raised 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Cmjdexter Or reeves is trying to bribe backbenchers with sweeteners

      The gov will need to spend £1.5bil on winter fuel u turns but it will be mathematically worth it if it’s a concession that helps stage one of disability cuts of £5bil+ go through

      There’s a train of thought that the British public are more sympathetic of ppl with children and oaps so u turns from those groups are more politically valuable.

      However a decent % of oap’s are comfortably off and for 90%? having children is yes a human right but it’s also a choice for the majority

      Being disabled or sick for 90% is not a choice and can hit anyone and the public forgets that

      There has been a reason why for months both Tory and Labour gov have ordered media of selling image that disabled are scroungers, faking illness and undeserving of the same quality of life as our able bodied counterparts


      So yes there’s the clear problem that if backbenchers can be ‘bought’ then we are a little stuffed

      However it’s not just disabled who have been given the middle finger by this gov but our carers and families:loved ones - that adds up to millions of voter who if they vote with payback in mind could lose a huge number of MPs their seats next ge (only a minority of mp’s have millions in savings - the rest losing an mp’s income could hugely impact them financially and career wise)

      There’s the saying of taking someone down with you

      This legislation may be higher stakes for disabled as a whole - but MPs should be very worried if suddenly hundreds of thousands have nothing left to lose….
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Cmjdexter Yes,I'm thinking the same,they've spent the cash on the kids,we're being thrown under the bus
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Cmjdexter
      you're right to be concern. All governments have a nasty habit of announcing good policies (i.e. cash for schools and WFA for more pensioners) while more devastating policies announced at the same time slip by in the background as everyone* focuses on the good stuff.

      *Let's call "everyone" the mainstream media.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Cmjdexter It's not over till it's over and then it's still not over.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    There is no point in me writing, my mp Jo platt is in favour of the cuts 100%
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    They're not budging on the cuts and they clearly don't care about the damage they've caused and the further damage they'll cause.

    This is a brazen, provocative attack on the most vulnerable.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I don't want to sound pessimistic but it now feels like we are fighting a loosing battle 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @D D your reply has reassured me a bit. Any of the MP's I have written to are not supporting the cuts. I hope every MP who votes for the Green Paper loses their seat at the next GE. It's going to be a rough ride for all of us in the coming weeks with what's going to be reported on social media/newspapers/mainstream news. So please everyone on here remember to practice self care. p.s. I'll have to practice my own advice. :)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @YogiBear I repeat that if the gov was confident of ‘victory’ they would of already published legislation and had a vote in commons

      I think their current strategy is endurance based and a ‘who blinks first situation’

      They want disabled people to get disillusioned by no progress or concessions and want us to stop fighting, accept our ‘fate’ as set in stone and give up

      Now is not the time to give up but also buckle in for s long battle.

      Those who are disillusioned need to look up the definition of ‘poker face’ and remember disabled, carers and loved ones hold some cards (our vote may not win a election for Labour but our shear numbers could lose it for them - and that’s just based on mindless vengeance voting not even tactical voting)

      Those losing faith should try not to bring others down with them - and take a step back to see that the disabled may not be winning the battle but neither are the dwp and Labour ministers

      (And with the winter fuel u turn and £87bil investment being spent on (more ‘luxury’ than essential department) science and tech over next 5 years (basically a magic money tree vineyard) it makes zero sense to target the disabled community with the choice of cuts and reforms they are. There’s obviously money to ‘splurge’ so Labour should bin cuts and start from stratch actually involving disabled community who may have their own ideas of how dwp can save money & get ppl into work without putting majority into poverty and close to mental breakdown 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Russell I agree Russell. The government doesn't seem to be backing down. I think they'll get the Green Paper passed however down the line there'll be some tweaks to it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Russell Well I don't want to sound naive, but I think we're winning. But we need to keep fighting - it's a war. 

      I didn't down vote you, @ Russell, btw.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Russell All of us always knew it was a David vs Goliath situation

      However if it was a loosing battle legislation would of already been published as well as a 2nd reading vote

      Part of me is wondering if Labour is about to change tactics to outlasting and who blinks first

      This ongoing saga & limbo is taking its toll on every disabled person and it takes energy to keep up the fight attitude 

      Certain Labour ministers are hoping that the majority of disabled will accept their fates and stop protesting and making so much noise so backbenchers feel less under threat and are more easily flipped 

      I don’t think any person on this site is under any illusions that we are the underdogs with one hell of a mountain to climb

      But as these cuts are higher stakes and consequences for disabled community the seriousness of the situation should push all of us to keep the pressure up even though keeping up the intensity for monthly’s will be tough (though realistically we have no choice if we want to keep our heads above water) - we can’t afford for mass disabled to lie down in defeat and allow the dwp bus to drive over us

      Personal opinion only


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Will write today. Thanks for all your guidance.
    Below report in Guardian. If this sways wavering Labour MPs they’re imbeciles. We’re talking relative pennies compared to the other cuts (although I’m pleased for struggling pensioners of course):

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Will do, especially as my MP refuses to reply to the emails I have sent about the proposed cuts.