Claimants votes will count in Makerfield, where the number of personal independence payment (PIP) recipients is enough to influence the outcome of the most important byelection in recent history, according to the DWP’s own statistics. 

The DWP’s statxplore tool reveals that there are 8,225 PIP claimants aged 18 and over and 5,464  universal credit health element recipients in the constituency.

At the last election, Labour held the seat with a majority of 5,399 with 40,263 votes cast in all, out of a total electorate of 76,641 (52.55% turnout).

This means that PIP claimants alone make up over 10% of the Makerfield electorate.

The most recent poll in Makerfield put Labour ahead at 43% compared to Reform on 40%.  So, the number of PIP claimants is potentially considerably more than the difference in votes between the two main contenders.

Given so close a race, where might those disabled claimants who have their future financial welfare top of their list of priorities, place their vote?

Reform on benefits

Back at the beginning of April, Farage announced that Reform would soon provide details of “the biggest cuts to the benefits bill ever seen in the history of this country".  Since then he has claimed that Reform’s plans are so radical they will cause “riots” and “strikes”.

But the local elections have come and gone, the Makerfield byelection campaign is underway and Reform have still to give any details of their grand plan.

But Reform have already announced three changes that will affect current claimants if they get into power:

Stopping PIP for 80-90% of claimants with depression or anxiety.

A crackdown on Motability, with Lee Anderson jeering that he would bring back the blue three-wheeler.

Incentivising benefits assessors to fail claimants.

In this regard, it’s worth noting that in Makerfield:

2,940 PIP claimants have psychiatric disorders listed as the main condition for their claim and 986 of these have anxiety or mixed anxiety and depressive disorders as the basis of their award.

4,235 PIP claimants get the enhanced rate of the mobility component, making them eligible for the Motability scheme.

Even if there is considerable overlap between the two groups, they still make up  at least 5% of the Makerfield electorate, more than the difference between the two candidates according to current polls.

In a knife edge election, the votes of these claimants, whose welfare has been plainly threatened by Reform, could be crucial.

Labour on benefits

Readers don’t needed to be reminded of what many regard as the unforgiveable betrayal by Labour’s front bench when it comes to benefits.  Cuts to UC health for new claimants will plunge many into poverty.  And the attempt to slash PIP by introducing the 4-point rule would have devastated the lives of vast numbers of current claimants.

But Labour backbenchers and many others in the Labour movement fought back against the PIP  cuts.  And it would be fair to say that Andy Burnham was a strong voice urging MPs to vote against the government’s welfare reforms.

Now, however, claimants are waiting for the outcome of the Timms review, with a real possibility that Labour’s front bench are plotting another assault on PIP.  And there are many other likely  attacks waiting in the wings, including the abolition of the work capability assessment and the introduction of a new, time-limited, unemployment insurance contributory benefit.

Labour are not a party that many claimants would wish to give their vote to.

Least worst option

But it is fairly certain that there are only two parties with any hope of winning in Makerfield. At present the polls don’t put any other party even into double figures. Either Labour or Reform will take the seat.

If Labour take it, there is a strong possibility that Burnham will go on to be the next leader of the Labour Party and the next prime minister.  And there is then a possibility, though very far from a certainty given Burnham’s reputation for ever changing loyalties, that Labour’s new front bench will be less punitive towards disabled claimants.

If Reform take the seat, however, it is a cast iron certainty that it will be a disaster for disabled claimants.  The Labour party will be in disarray, with a fatally damaged leader and no obvious replacement, with the possible exception of Wes Streeting who has said he wants to cut welfare to pay for weapons.

Reform will receive a huge boost to their morale and their credibility. They will look more than ever like the party destined to win the next election, with all that entails for disabled people.

We know, that disabled claimant numbers in Makerfield mean that they can make a real difference to the outcome of this election.  And right now, unpalatable as it may seem, voting Labour may well be the only way to avert the disaster of a Reform victory.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Andy Burnham has pledged to cut welfare spending to fund more defence spending.

    On his planned cut to welfare spending he said

    “I am not squeamish about saying that the plan would be to reduce the welfare bill. Not at all.

    "But it is not the traditional Westminster way of just crude cuts, short-term crude cuts that then create a backlash and create more political turbulence.

    "It is actually going to do things that will actually reduce the benefits bill, which is moving towards a more preventative state that makes the right investments to support people into work.”
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    I’m glad I don’t live in Makerfield. I would not trust Burnham as far as I could throw him. He is using this deliberately manufactured by election to get to be prime minister (elected by his Party with no mandate from the voters) where he will probably do another of his about turns, just like Starmer before him. He is touted as the saviour of this country but we’ll need a lot more than empty rhetoric to do that and I doubt that Labour have the guts to do what really needs doing! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Bern400 And Labour's attempts at welfare reform are:

      The 4pt PIP rule which would have removed PIP daily living from 46% of existing claimants. And was to be followed by the Timms PIP review further reducing eligibility. So combined what 60%+ to lose PIP daily living. Now we just have the Timms review but we know what the aim is. I expect the Timms review recommendations when we get them will shock a lot of people.

      The reduction and uprating freeze of LCWRA element for about 98% of new claimants not placed in the severe conditions criteria group.

      Abolishing WCA and making UC health element based on receiving PIP daily living component. And remove eligibility to UC health from 18-20 year olds. And abolish ESA so removing eligibility from those who do not meet means testing. Reducing UC/ESA health eligibility (if you take into the PIP changes) by what about 70%.

      My guesstimate figures for Labour don't look much different to those you gave for Reform and the Conservatives. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Anne-Marie @Anne-Marie. I accept labour have made a dog's dinner of running the country over the last 2 years, however they're the LEAST worst option from a disabled person's point of view. The Tories, Reform and more recently Restore are falling over themselves bragging about how much they will slash welfare (specifically the disability budget)........Lee Anderson and Robert Jenerick state upto 70-80% of existing disability claimants will lose some or all of their benefits!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    Absolutely... Reform are to the disabled what Heat is to ice... Reform would take everything away from everyone, and make them fight to get it back!
    And I do not exaggerated! We have seen what Reform stand for... £5 billion in cuts to welfare, and none of that from pensioners... No mention of working tax credits, UC claimed by working people, or sickness benefits, majority claimed by working people...
    Leaves PIP, UC for the disabled, sickness benefits for the under 25 meets...
    So vote Everyone, don't give these merciless warmongers, because like Streeting, they would've had us in a war, a toehold in the Houses of Parliament...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @David Macfie Don't the Tories want to make 23 billion worth of cuts and Reform said they had found 40 billion worth of savings on welfare and civil service cuts.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    All MPs will say what they think their core voters want to hear To get their votes They are all hairy at the heel So can not be relied on Benefit changes should not be all about saving or increasing the budget But be about  making lives better If that means helping some back into work With all the adequate help required Or more funds for catching fraudulent claiming Plus those that truly need help not should not be treated like malingerers Who ever wins this vote I fear that little is going to change for the better For taxpayers and those needing the governments help
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    The above B&W article is absolutely spot on. Any unemployed and/or disabled person voting Reform are like the proverbial turkeys who are hoodwinked into voting for christmas in return for a quick feast but don't realise that shortly after being fattened up they will be hung, strung and quartered ready for christmas day. Farage is using a similar trick to con the poor and working class in this country by promising to make their lives better by stopping migration and deporting all the illegals. But what these gullible fools don't realise, is that similar to the aforementioned turkeys, they too will be (metaphorically) hung, strung, and quartered when Farage slashes the welfare bill by £40billion a year and the majority of these useful idiots who voted Reform lose their UC, Housing benefit, Council tax deduction, child care tax credits, child benefit (reinstalling the 2 child benefit cap), LWRCA, PIP, and mobility car so the Reform party can use these savings to slash taxes for big multi conglomerate businesses and mega wealthy individuals - especially those £billionaire crypto currency company owners like Christopher Harbone who was reported recently for donating £22 million to the Reform Party and a further £5 million personally to Farage. This by-election is probably one of the most important in history......if Burnham loses, Labour will collapse shortly afterwards and lose the next general election to Reform. However, if Burnham wins he would of shown the Labour party and the whole of the Country that Reform can be beaten even in their heartlands of strong support, and several opinion polls say that a Burnham lead Labour party are likely to leapfrog Reform and receive the most number of votes in the next general election although not enough for an outright majority.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    I would vote tactically to keep reform out at any cost. If that means Labour so be it. At least it may mean Burnham wresting the Labour Party back into the hands of more compassionate people than those who currently hold the reins. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    The very thought of Reform ruling this country genuinely terrifies me , not just for me but all disabled people , I was raped , contracted HIV,  I self harm and have bulimia, the very thought that I will be suddenly forced to look for work is a scary prospect -if it comes to it , I'd be one of their statistics of having good on their hands... 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Reform is fooling the poorly educated gullible minds! They're parroting that they'll abolish Indefinite Leave to Remain!

    They would not be able to abolish it without primary legislation. Because ILR is a statutory right governed by the Immigration Act 1971, entirely scrapping it or retrospectively stripping it from current holders would require passing an Act of Parliament through both the House of Commons and the House of Lords.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @John Burnham has now ruled out calling a snap general election if he becomes PM. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion Burnham is apparently considering calling a snap general election if he becomes PM. With a new Labour manifesto. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @John Because they would need a pack of miracles to get a majority in parliament, and I don't even think that they would be in a position to form the next government. Reform's current surge in the polls is fundamentally driven by the perception that Britain is "broken" and a pervasive distrust in established parties. The factors that are driving this perception-based surge, which Reform is channeling this anger, can be tackled and improved by mid 2029. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Scorpion And why couldn't they do that if they get a majority in parliament? Parliament has supremacy over the Lords. And it is tradition that the Lords will not stop a bill that is fulfilling a manifesto pledge. And even if the Lords wanted to stop it the Commons can use the Parliament Acts to overrule the Lords. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    It doesn't seem to matter when we have uneducated disabled people voting for reform, they havnt looked at the welfare policy and are voting only on the immigration issue,and you cant tell them,they wont listen,absolute madness but here we are in this intolerable situation where we basically have people voting to lose their own income!! Couldn't make it up,if it was a movie script it would be rejected for being totally unbelievable!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Neil (real one) My local bus driver was asking all the passengers last week if they were going to vote Reform
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Anon All in all its my hope that reform don't see power as they will clearly destroy the benefit system,hopefully they do not get in power. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Anon spot on sir madam .. spot on  .. !!! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @John Maybe they think Farage will go easy on them in office,didn't Reform also say they wanted too look at the way money was spent in the NHS.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Cookie Clacton on Sea has an economic inactivity rate of 53% and they voted for Reform which wants to massively cut the numbers on disability and wants to limit unemployment benefit to 4 month. Thanks to the UK media dancing to Farage's tune and only focusing on immigration. Most probably did not know they were voting to make themselves destitute. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    In a story so unbelievable no one would believe it if you made it up.

    Talking of appealing for the votes of those on benefits. Reform MP Sarah Poachin has been on social media promoting that she got a a vulnerable old lady a council bungalow and her son a council flat. Complete with a video of the old lady saying how wonderful Reform are and that they should be in government so they can help everybody.

    Plot twist. The old lady is Ehel McGill an amateur actress. Who in real life is a convicted benefit fraudster who was sentenced to 5 years and 10 months after pleading guilty to 14 counts totalling £740,000 benefit fraud.

    After it was pointed out she is one of the UK's biggest benefit fraudsters, Reform purged their social media of the story and video. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Duncan I'm with you on this Duncan.  I'm not sure my original post reads the way I intended it, but hopefully it won't be too difficult for someone more worthy of the seat to overturn her tiny majority next time. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Wendy Woo I can't stand that woman, a privileged, clueless, wealthy woman who is happy to see the most vulnerable in society suffer
      I really hope she looses her seat 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @John  Probable abuse of influence, combined with manifest stupidity.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John Sarah Pochin really needs those votes; she was elected with a majority of just six.  Maybe that was why I heard her on the radio last week condemning benefit claimants.  Won't get fooled again.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    I hope my earlier post wasn't taken the wrong way. I am absolutely not saying that youngsters, disabled or able bodied, are less important than other claimants. 
    I sincerely hope the Milburn review and future recommendations offer some sort of hope to our younger generation.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    The Milburn review on NEETS (that focuses on disability benefits) findings report is out. The recommendations report will be out ar a latter date.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/young-people-and-work-interim-report/young-people-and-work-interim-report
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Cookie You have not addressed my points at all. The US war against Iran is undoubtedly hurting the fragile UK economy. The UK has suffered anaemic economic growth since the 2008 GFC and no party, including Labour, has any solution for this going forward. Meanwhile, wealth inequality has massively increased and the upwards transfer of wealth at the expense of everyone else continues unabated. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @chips and gravy I'm so tired right now I could just conk out in my chair tbh I get only about 3 hrs sleep in any 24hr period these days which is certainly not ideal 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John Thanks for the link John.  I haven't had time to read much of the report yet and all I've heard on the news seems biased towards how much this is costing the country - and, worse still, how much it might cost the country to do something about it - but it is a systemic problem which cannot easily be overcome.  I hope the government realises that these are real peoples' lives they are dealing with and not just statistics.  Having battled the SEND "system" for many years, I know a number of people (youngsters who grew up with my son) who would formerly have counted as "NEETs", but sadly, they are now too old to be included in this category and have just been abandoned without any real help and support to find a job, although most of them would love to work, even if only part-time.  Even voluntary jobs are hard to come by and many people with disabilities can be easily taken advantage of and exploited in these situations too.  I don't know what the solution is, but I really hope somebody can find one, as there is so much enthusiasm and talent going to waste.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Neil (real one) @Neil(real one)I don’t think they will already have their hands full with 1 million 18-24 year olds not working being over 50 is like a vintage car after a long while it starts slowing down until it conks out if you know what I mean and I am feeling better now after my bank holiday fall 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John They go on about stopping the young ones from ending up in benefits but what's gonna happen to the over 50s? Are we gonna get shafted too? Sorry for going on About this but I just wanna be left in peace...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    There is a report from the BBC today, that says the young/neets are caught in a perfect storm. I agree. They are. For them to find jobs, even with good exam grades, university degree is difficult at best.
    But what I find so saddening is whilst the BBC report/article is sympathetic to the situation they find themselves in, people who have disabilities/health issues, like myself are made out as fraudsters/cheats and are targets for the media to take shots at.
    I think it is so unjust and unfair.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @godgivemestrength You could be right.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Cookie Well if you've done the responsible thing and saved into a private pension, guess what, that income will be deducted from, even disqualify you from pc.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @godgivemestrength What about Pension Credit and Private pensions
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Cookie Exactly, and why are they working longer? Because they can't claim their state pension. And why are they turning to disability and various welfare benefits when their minds and bodies give out? I refer you to my previous answer.

      And why are the young becoming increasingly sick and turning to disability and various welfare benefits? Because they can't get work. And why can't they get work? Because the older generation is having to stay employed longer. And why is that? You get my drift.

      Raising spa has been a massive shot in the foot, disabling us all.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @maggie People are working longer this keeping the young out of the job market.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Does the ever increasing political rhetoric of scapegoating and demonising makes the unthinkable something that could happen?

    On the subject of claimants voting the Telegraph has a suggestion for:
    Reform the party for alarm clock Britain not welfare Britain
    Conservative the party for strivers not skivers
    Labour as it says it in the name the party for those who work not those who don't.

    "Should we ban the unemployed from voting?"

    "We need a radical plan to tackle the welfare state. And funnily enough, this one was proposed by the man who invented it"

    "Whenever Labour MPs vote to raise benefits, they insist that they’re doing it out of compassion. Cynics, however, believe that they do it out of sheer electoral self-interest. Labour MPs, they suspect, are confiscating money from people who don’t vote for them, and giving it to people who do, in order to ensure that they do so again. In effect, therefore, it’s bribery."

    " William Beveridge is best-known as the brains behind the welfare state. But in 1906, more than 35 years before he published “The Beveridge Report”, he made a proposal that was arguably even more radical. The “unemployable”, he argued, should be supported by the state – but, in return, they should relinquish “all citizen rights”, including “the franchise” and “fatherhood”."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/19/should-we-ban-unemployed-from-voting/

    We live in scary times.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @keepingitreal Don't they call it Gelding in horse racing parlance.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @John So was the thinking that those men who were unemployed and childless would be castrated?

      I suppose in 1906 women were not expected to have paid work, but now they are, what about motherhood? 

      If Starmer stands down or is deposed before the next general election will he not be able to vote?

      One of the drawbacks of extreme ideology is that it cannot withstand interrogation.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    It seems Blair is banging on about remove triple lock, slash welfare to pay for this country's war mongering abroad. What an ABSOLUTE DISGRACE HE IS.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Neil (real one) True
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Neil (real one) Neo-liberalism at it's worst. No care or compassion, no welfare or safety nets, just pushing poverty upon the masses to fund death, destruction and all the things that no average person wants.. I sincerely hope the opinions of Blair and his friend Alan Milburn are ignored.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    The worst long term situation is that we have an snap general election that reform win and we then have a situation of a 2year farage/trump overlap (not only would that be ‘game over’ for disabled claimants but also dystopian for all working and middle class citizens (esp if farage sells out the whole nhs so it’s basically privatised.

    Bottom line is that it’s not safe to have a general election till jan 2029 earliest and we can’t have another Gordon brown situation.

    In the short term we’d be better off under a weakened Starmer gov till at least late spring 2027 

    In an ideal world I’d want Burnham to win but not challenge for leadership till this time next year (wet his feet, let Starmer deal with the upcoming council reforms and backlash on welfare take 2)

    What is worrying me is the heavy rumours of Burnham plan to challenge Starmer for leadership almost straightaway and more worrying calling an early snap election pretty soon after so he can enact his own policy. Burnham is believing a lot of his own hype (that he’s labours version of the Messiah) and underestimating the damage starm has done to Labour. 

    Right now the next general election seems to be about sending a middle finger to the status quo so any party that’s never been in power has a huge advantage (the Lib Dem’s will be cursing ever going into coalition- their politics are moderate compared to the dystopian policies of reform and greens imo) - the newly obtained councils for reform and greens are good dry runs (if you can’t run a council well you have no chance of successfully running the country)

    Also reform are a lot less of a problem if you cut the head of the snake - a scandal may yet sink farage but time is needed - also reform support has reached its peak so it’s the worst time to have a snap election.

    Obviously if burnham doesn’t win I can see streeting challenging straight away (and too many Labour MPs want Starmer gone asap to bide their time) - if it’s Starmer vs streeting with Labour membership I think Starmer could win it but I can’t imagine the left not putting forward a candidate (my vote would be for miliband as he clearly doesn’t want to be leader so may be the safest bet compared to the other power hungry candidates for the job)

    I don’t agree with benefit&work argue of the lesser of evils as the last time that arguement was used Starmer got a huge majority which has been hugely damaging to the country.

    Honestly this by-election is like Russian roulette where only one gun is unloaded

    Reform is predictable but Burnham policies seem to change week to week making him ‘high risk, high reward’ but definitely a vanity project where it’s unclear who’s side Burnham is on and what social groups he ends up targeting to fund his policies.

    So any voters in the by-election area I can’t recommend who to vote for but only if a candidate pops up on your doorstep ask a truckload of questions
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @D Back in April before the local elections Miliband was trying to position himself for a coronation to replace Starmer. And Miliband's friends have been accused of actively trying to destabilise and bring down Starmer. So I take the idea of him being a reluctant contender with a large pinch of salt.

      As for it would be best if Starmer remained leader until at least late spring 2027. And best if Starmer takes the backlash for a second bout of welfare reform. I think those who would be hit by the welfare reform are likely to want Labour to change direction before running them over not after. As they are likely to be more concerned with their own wellbeing than the future election chances of Labour. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Sorry cookie been in hospital had a anxiety attack in the heatwave and I was found unconscious I’m fine now yes I heard about dwp vans a bit like the old style tv license tricks ha ha Blackpool is fun in the summer but dead in the winter has a great zoo also I’m not scared of milburn and co bring it on I say 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Reform are saying they will cut taxes with savings from welfare.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I have to disagree with the thrust of the above article which puts forward the idea that people should vote Labour as that is the lesser of two evils. The Labour Party has totally abandoned any moral compass and the fury/hatred which large numbers of working class people feel towards Labour is testament to this.
    The many failures and the outright corruption of Starmer and his clique (freebiegate) have prepared the ground for Reform to surge in the last 2 years. What the people of the UK need, and what many of us activists in the labour movement are campaigning for, is for the unions to stop wasting their time propping up Labour which has betrayed the organised working class and set up a new working class party. 
    Burnham cannot be trusted as far as anyone could throw him.
    His record as Manchester mayor leaves alot to be desired. Manchester still suffers from very high levels of poverty and homelessness. Walk down from Picadilly station into the city centre and you will see lots of homeless people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Cookie your point being? Without union money the Labour Party, which is an enemy of the trade union movement, would collapse.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @bronc Unions haven't got the power they had in the seventies and eighties.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Steve As a lifelong trade unionist and socialist historian, I've written extensively about the history of the British labour movement, and former LP member I have always taken the position that you cannot trust any party in government. Working class people have to rely on their collective strength to get improvements in their lives. History reveals this to be true time and time again. 
      I have offered an alternative which is for the unions to break from Labour and set up a new working class party. In 1900 most of the unions were clinging to the coat tails of the Liberal Party. Anti trade laws and actions by Liberal governments led to a growing number of unions abandoning the Liberals to join the LRC (Labour Representation Committee) and then the Labour Party. I must add that socialist organisations such as the SDF and ILP were instrumental in helping set up the LRC in 1900. 
      Secondly, regardless of which party is in power disabled people have to rely on their own campaigning work in alliance with other groups, such as unions amongst others, to fight in defence of their rights. Relying on career politicians to defend your interests is a strategy of passivity and unlikely to work as history reveals time and again.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Steve Obviously vote Green, they're the only ones who want to do some good in the country. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @bronc As I mentioned below, so what is your solution Bronc? Vote Reform? You seem to be constantly shooting down labour in all your comments yet offer no alternatives. I will never vote Reform and thankfully many others won't either, people will eventually see through reform's constant attempts to scapegoat this countries woes by blaming the sick/disabled or migrants. I certainly will NEVER support Farage and his millionaire friends who only want to fill their own pockets while they point the finger at the most vulnerable people in society and blame us for all the countries issues. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    It absolutely boggles my mind when I see sick and disabled people who survive on disability benefits actually come out defending and voicing support for Reform. I've seen a worrying number of sick/disabled people defending Reform online recently. 'Turkeys voting for thanksgiving' springs to mind. Farage and his multi-millionaire capitalist buddies view people like us as a burden on society, they deem us as nothing more than parasites who are taking up space/money. It baffles me why anyone would support Reform, let alone any sick/disabled people!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Jay They support Reform for one reason and one reason only, we all know what that is sadly. 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.