The influential, Labour dominated Commons Work and Pensions committee (WPC) has written to the government calling for it to delay any changes to personal independence payment (PIP) eligibility and universal credit (UC) rates.

The WPC began an inquiry into the Pathways to Work Green Paper on 3 April, but has issued interim findings and recommendations because a Commons vote on some of the provisions is expected soon.

The WPC warns the government in its letter that the proposed changes “might not incentivise work, as the Government hopes, but rather push people deeper into poverty, worsen health, especially in more deprived areas, and move people further from the labour market, as evidence suggests has happened in the past with similar reforms.” 

In its letter, the committee asks the government to: “delay any changes to PIP eligibility or UC rates, extend and expand the current consultation, and work to co-produce measures with disabled people and their organisations, reflecting the Government’s commitment on ‘nothing about me, without me’.

The letter goes on to recommend that the government:  “take a ‘precautionary principle’ approach and immediately undertake an independent, comprehensive analysis of the impact of the proposed cuts in UC health support on employment, poverty and health outcomes.”

Finally, the committee urges the government to:  “delay its plans to amend the eligibility criteria for the daily living component of PIP and engage disabled people and their organisations in order to coproduce proposals for a new PIP, as part of the PIP review. Most importantly, we need to guarantee that those who need PIP will not lose out. At that point, it should publish and properly consult on its proposals more widely.”

Liz Kendall has until Monday 2 June to respond to the letter.

Chair of the committee, Debbie Abrahams, told ITV news that there was expert evidence that cutting benefits could increase the risk of suicides. 

The WPC is made up of 11 MPs:  7 Labour, 2 Conservative, 2 LibDem.

Moreover, as the Canary pointed out, four of the Labour MPs are members of the “Get Britain Working” group which actively supports benefit cuts.

In theory, this is a committee whose loyalty the government should be able to count on.

So, for it to express such strong concerns about the Green Paper will be a real blow for Labour, which is struggling to find anyone who is in favour of its proposals.

You can download a copy of the letter, along with oral evidence transcripts and copies of written evidence here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 minutes ago
    Thanks to benefits and work for publishing this good news, there is so much doom and gloom around at the moment. It's promising that the WPC are supposedly loyal to the labour party yet even they can see how harmful and harsh these proposals are, not to mention the effect they are already having on disabled people and their families. But of course, Starmer, Reeves, Kendall and Timms will take no notice, they simply won't listen as they haven't been doing all along. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Probably a question for the people at B&W: does the govt have to act on these recommendations? Or is it protocol to do so?  Or is it known for governments to just plough on anyway? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    long letter sent to MP by email. I'll update you all on his response. I have also contacted the RNIB campaigns department to see what they are doing as well (not a lot it seems, which I fear is common throughout the 'charitable' sector)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    oh dear seems like the ides of march no one wants to lose their comfy seats and pay 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    I hope B & W don't mind me sending this over to my MP, with my own individual thoughts, certainly around employment. Most employers do not have a clue how to interact with disabled colleagues, and frankly find us too much of a hassle, not least many of us are probably better educated than them, and certainly more assertive, which they consider to be aggression.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Thank you Benefits and Work, and thank you James for your comment — and yes, no doubt they’ll respond with the same garbage rhetoric we’ve heard again and again.

    But where is the accountability for the suffering already caused — not just by those who were in power, but by those who are still choosing to carry these viscious disabling policies forward?

    How many more sleepless nights, hospital visits, mental health emergencies, and relapses in chronic illness are needed before someone takes responsibility?

    How many carers, families, and friends have had to bear the emotional toll, watching the people they love deteriorate under this  stress and fear?

    Given up hope of accountability from the DWP long ago — and now we’re left asking: does it even exist in government - it looks like Deborah Abraham's and her committee seem to be trying to lead the way to a kinder politics of the future. Will they be heard?

    God knows — I really hope something better comes from all of this: from the petitions, the letters, the raw courage of all of us campaigning together. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 minutes ago
      @CaroA So agree. The levels of public hostility have been ratcheted up by the government in an attempt to sway public opinion against us.  I doubt that will change back any time soon.  We all have to live with that and cope with its daily effects. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    We're winning. Slowly but surely, we're winning. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I didn't score 4 points on any PIP descriptors, but still got PIP. I only attended ONE in-person interview at the job centre. The work coach took one look at me and my multiple conditions, and said that she would not impose any work conditions on me whilst I wait for my medical assessment. Until then all other interviews were to be over the phone, including my medical. I was told due to my conditions they didn't want me attending the Job centre in person - I believe due to health and safety risks as amongst my many conditions I have balance issues which cause me to fall over, and along with osteoporosis makes me too risky to attend in person. If I did lose my PIP would I suddenly be deemed to not be at risk to attend appointments in person etc? Nobody would employ me as I doubt they would get insurance to cover the risk of me possibly falling over and breaking my hip etc. How many other people in the country also would also be deemed a health and safety risk, but didn't get 4 points for any PIP descriptors?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Clockaholic Absolutely loads of people would be in your situation. That’s why they must listen to us 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    07:23 Radio 4 Today - Not even the formidable Emma Barnett could move Debbie Abrahams much off script, but credit to the Work and Pensions Committee for their work so far. Given the committee comprises mainly Labour mps, could this be an additional rebel faction when it comes to the welfare green paper vote?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Thank you B&W for this important information. It is good if the government will listen to the committee and all the organisations have advised against the cuts, but we all know what Liz Kendall and Sir Stephen Timms will end up uttering! They will say the same that cutting benefits will create jobs and that people are languishing on these benefits and will have to get jobs to live richer and fuller lives inspite of their disabilities and illnesses! This has been their "mantra" and this is their defence to anyone criticizing their policies! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @James
      On the other hand, a Labour-dominated select committee calling for the cuts to be paused may well carry weight with Labour backbenchers and add to the already growing rebellion. 

      The government is now in a real hole: if they press ahead despite these dire warnings from the committee they may well exacerbate the rebellion and be in serious danger of losing the vote. On the other hand, if they pause the cuts then MPs will be able to see detailed impact assessments before the vote. Those assessments will almost certainly be damning - and that might be enough to persuade more of their own MPs to vote against the cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @James Along with the vacuous threats of the welfare system imploding and not being there for those who most need it now and into the future.  We must not forget that they are our saviour and that's why it's urgent and imperative that they do this
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @James It's an increasingly feeble and fading mantra, though.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.