Liz Kendall, secretary of state for work and pensions.

Liz Kendall has been named as the new secretary of state for work and pensions

Kendall has been an MP since 2010 and was shadow secretary of state for work and pensions from September 2023.

She presents a mixed picture in relation to her support for incapacity and disability benefits claimants.

Kendall came fourth in the 2015 Labour leadership election, where she said that the party had to support welfare benefits reforms or face being out of power for decades.

She was the only leadership candidate to back the Conservative government’s benefits cap.

But in September 2023, when the conservatives proposed changes to make the work capability assessment harder to pass, Kendall argued that this was just “tinkering at the edges of a failing system”:

“But if you run your NHS into the ground for 13 years and let waiting lists for physical and mental health soar, if you fail to reform social care to help people caring for their loved ones, and if your sole aim is to try and score political points rather than reforming the system to get sick and disabled people who can work the help they really need, you end up with the mess we have today.

“A system that is failing sick and disabled people, that is failing taxpayers, and failing our country as a whole. Britain deserves far better than this.”

According to theyworkforyou.com, Kendall has a strong record in voting for paying higher benefits for those unable to work due to illness or disability and against a reduction in spending on welfare benefits

In April this year she challenged the then secretary of state for work and pensions Mel Stride to say “on what evidential basis he stated to The Telegraph on 20 March 2024 that GPs were signing people off work for feeling down and bluesy.”

In March, Kendall told the Demos think tank that Labour would recruit 8,500 more mental health workers and that the sickness benefits bill would fall under Labour.

“Under our changed Labour party, if you can work there will be no option of a life on benefits,” she warned.

She argued that work is good for mental health, saying: “We know that if you’re in good work, your relapses can be cut by a third or even half. That’s better for you. It’s better for the NHS, it’s better for taxpayers.”

In June of this year, Kendall told the Guardian that the Labour would investigate the carer’s allowance overpayment scandal and that it would be an “absolute priority” for her.

Alison McGovern – DWP minister, role not yet revealed

McGovern has been an MP since 2010.

She is chair of Progressive Britain, a think tank on the right wing of the Labour Party.

She was the Shadow Minister for Employment and Social Security until the election and it is likely that this is the post she has been given at the DWP.

According to theyworkforyou.com, Kendall has a strong record in voting for paying higher benefits for those unable to work due to illness or disability and against a reduction in spending on welfare benefits.

In response to a Conservative plan to create “skills bootcamps” for unemployed people in order to reduce reliance on foreign labour,  McGovern said in May of this year:

“It is Labour who have the plan to get Britain working by cutting NHS waiting lists, reforming job centres, making work pay and supporting people into good jobs across every part of the country.”

Sir Stephen Timms MP – DWP minister but role not yet revealed

Timms has been an MP since 1994.  He was a minister under Tony Blair, serving in the DWP and the Treasury

He has also served as shadow minister for employment and shadow secretary of state for work and pensions. 

Until the election was called, he was chair of the work and pensions select committee and was generally supportive of claimants on incapacity and disability benefits.  His appointment as a DWP minister is probably the best news so far and there seems a strong chance that he will be minister for disabled people.

In January 2022 Timms used his power to publish a report “The uses of health and disability benefits” which deals in part with the unmet needs of benefits claimants and which the DWP had been fighting for years to keep secret.

In March 2022, Timms attacked the DWP’s “culture of secrecy” when it failed to support research into whether there is a link between benefits sanctions, ill health and even suicide.

In September 2022, Timms’ committee asked the DWP to help with the cost of living crisis by pausing deductions from benefits where a claimant owes the department money, perhaps because of an overpayment or loan.  The DWP refused.

Timms committee also produced a report in April 2023, ‘Health assessments for benefits’, which thousands of Benefits and Work members contributed to.  Amongst the report’s recommendations were:

Claimants should be paid an assessment rate of PIP if the DWP takes too long to carry out an assessment.

Claimants should be able to choose whether to have a face-to-face, telephone or video assessment.

The deadline for returning ESA50, UC50 and PIP2 forms should be extended to two months.

More weight should be given to evidence provided by carers and family members in relation to benefits claims.

Young people in receipt of DLA should not be required to claim PIP until they are 18.

The DWP should publish anonymized data every year on all instances of death or serious harm associated with health assessments and set out what steps it has taken to prevent them happening again.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    MariW · 3 hours ago
    On Sky News Q & A

    How will a Labour government affect benefits?

    Marie-Kate

    How will this affect PIP and benefits?

    Here's what our business presenter Ian King says...

    The expectation is that the UK's principal disability benefit, Personal Independence Payments or PIP, will change.

    Labour has promised an overhaul of the welfare system, taking in Universal Credit as well as PIP, although details are currently scant. The thrust of Labour's policy, though, will be to try and reduce economic inactivity and get more people of working age into the labour force.

    The party's manifesto said on this: "Labour will work with local areas to create plans to support more disabled people and those with health conditions into work. We will devolve funding so local areas can shape a joined-up work, health, and skills offer for local people.

    "We will tackle the backlog of access to work claims and give disabled people the confidence to start working without the fear of an immediate benefit reassessment if it does not work out. We believe the work capability assessment is not working and needs to be reformed or replaced, alongside a proper plan to support disabled people to work."

    One big short-term question is whether the new government will stick with proposals being discussed by the Department for Work and Pensions to bring down the cost of PIP by, for example, replacing some cash payments with vouchers to buy specific treatment or pieces of equipment.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Blanche · 7 hours ago
    I dont trust either party.
    "Work is good for you" is just "strivers vs skivers" (2010s) or "natives vs immigrants" (2020s) in different words, semantic games - it amounts to the same logic. They kept Kendall and DWP related matters well away from them media during the campaign.
    This was because they are no different to the Tories and the only votes hard right policies gain, like this (700000 working age kicked off sickness benefits), are gains away from the centre, which they were at pains to not be seen doing (even though they were doing it). Starmer is a Blairite, Reeves has boasted she is "no socialist", Kendall describes herself as "Blue Labour" and is opposed to "reliance on the welfare state".
    It feels like, in crude simplified terms, if you are not in a wheelchair or fresh from a section/psych ward then you will be treated as a malingerer . How else are they going to stop nearly 3/4 of a million people being entitled to it?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Zon · 11 hours ago
    They are going to try and differentiate themselves from the Tories, by ensuring "savings" are made, so they can boast that they did the job.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Carolin · 12 hours ago
    As a Labour party member and voter, this will now be put under scrutiny as they are in government. They will need to prove themselves now.

    If you live in Scotland or Wales (like me), there is definitely extra hope. Starmer has made it abundantly clear before the election, during the campaign, and now in his first speech after becoming PM that further devolution and regional decision making is coming.

    This means Wales will likely be getting extra powers, including on Welfare (which, unlike in Scotland, it doesn't have). But how far could the devolution go to regions within England itself, I don't know. His speech made it clear though that he will be talking to whoever is in charge in those regions, whatever party or brand controls it, to give them the chance at making their own decisions in the future.

    I know there are many who will read this and comment how 'Labour is the same' etc. Honestly, after the last 14 years, I get it, especially if you're a young person like me who has only ever known a Tory government in your adult life. But like I said, Labour has been out of power for so long they really have to work hard to make sure they can stay in power for more than just 1 term. They cant afford to be 'the same'. I urge any reader who is worried about the welfare system, and that does include myself, to show patience and see where this new government take us in the next year or so.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Doctor · 13 hours ago
    IMPORTANT - If you haven’t already - answer the green paper for the Tories proposals - Labour will be scrutinising it carefully to see where they should go - be polite, but firm and frank. It will take half an hour to an hour - PLEASE - For all of us, answer with a resounding NO to those insane changes. 

    The link is here. https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=6fbxllcQF0GsKIDN_ob4wy4AdhV04YtOnxNXoi82ciFUN00yS0lJSTgzOVNaUzI1TVpYRkZGN1RUQSQlQCN0PWcu

    I think she’s right to point out the flaws in the system that have led us here - but I worry that the approach will lack compassion and be too heavy handed. Yes, many people on benefits want to work - but the prospect of trying, failing and having to do a whole new claim has been a deterrent in and of itself. The system needs to support us, not demonise us. I would love to be able to work, and obviously finding an employer who can tolerate the days I’m unavailable because of excruciating pain or unexpected hospital visits - well it’s not exactly appealing for a business who wants to prosper. 

    But the current approach of “shove them in any job and if they say no cut off their benefits” has to end.

    The system MUST be rooted in compassion and with a firm understanding that every claimants individual circumstances are different. That makes it hard to form policy changes yes - but it’s the only way forward. 

    A firm hand will only make the bruises worse. A compassionate and supportive approach will help those of us who want to work, into work. 

    For those who cannot work, the system needs to be reformed to offer them nothing but support. No re-assessing, no sanctions, no “guilty until proven innocent”. 

    Quite frankly I think her first move should be to sack everyone who’s worked under and supported the Tory approach. 

    This may not be the firm commitment ray of hope we were hoping for - but it’s better than the alternative we knew was coming with the Tories, I don’t think any of us even know what they meant by replacing PIP with a catalogue. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      mrfibro · 4 hours ago
      @Doctor How can you get taxis etc with a catalogue system !  Tory minds are delusional.  Let's hope, and it'll be a big hope Labour can be more empathetic towards claimants.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      A · 6 hours ago
      @Doctor "Quite frankly I think her first move should be to sack everyone who’s worked under and supported the Tory approach."

      Wishful thinking.

      If you backtrack her trajectory, you would realise that she's more wicked and detrimental than the Tories themselves. She's an immoral Tory in Labour skin.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    WinstonSmithy1984 · 21 hours ago
    I wouldn't trust Labour in the same way I wouldn't trust CONservatives. Both parties are very much cut from the same cloth, and both parties will penalise sick and disabled claiments with wolf like tactics. 5 yrs of progressive Socialist ideology and you can bet your bottom dollar that Labour will be no different in all but name. I don't even think Reform would be any different. One day I can see the benefit system being totally removed altogether without any safety net. Something many people don't believe will ever happen, but it's apparent that Labour will overhaul Universal Credit at somepoint. Universal Credit is already a very Socialist collectvised system of central control. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    CarolK · 22 hours ago
    Work isn't better for you, if you're disabled, it's a stigma like being black or LGBT. You are treated differently from day one, and sometimes can become a target for the workplace bullies. I'd rather stay at home on the small amount of welfare I receive, thank you. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      mrfibro · 4 hours ago
      @CarolK I agree with you totally.  It's healthier not to work, than to be bullied, and intimidated, day in day out in the workplace by coworkers and managerial staff too.  I've been there, done it.  No rep helped at all or HR either.  They all thought being disabled meant having no limbs, or blind, or deaf or both and wheel chair bounded.

      And i worked in local government, who supposingly championed themselves wanting disabled people to work, and offering them equal rights and opportunities.  There was zero help, nearly all staff were resentful, awkward, and quite spiteful towards me and others.

      The whole system in Britain does not cater for ALMOST all of disabled people in the UK.  





  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Doesitmatter · 23 hours ago

    Terrifying language of Starmer’s new minister for the sick & disabled.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Holly · 23 hours ago
    It's like with all services they change hands so.eone else comes in. Same old goverment just different name just things happening a lot faster 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Loopy Lou · 1 days ago
    The new health element for universal credit is very sinister. It is integrating health and benefit entitlement, but not at a GP level. GPs will no longer be allowed to send patients to secondary care.  Instead patients will be referred to onsite specialist nurses a bit like ATOS who will trivialise and downplay symptoms. They will then decide if you can have an appointment with secondary care teams or deem you fit for work.  This is likely to lead to poor quality care and inaccurate diagnosis. Medical evidence will be much more difficult to obtain. Some councils are discouraging Mental health advocacy and outreach teams helping seriously ill people  with forms.  This is dangerous.  An accident waiting to happen.  Any help is only help when it is voluntary.  Anything mandatory with sanctions attached is force.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 1 days ago
    There's an article in the Daily Record today (Sunday 7th July ) about Labour's plans to get more disabled people back into the workforce 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Tony · 1 days ago
    I will reserve judgment for now. I am very much a Socialists, but I will never forget how Labour’s little weasel James Purnell treated us in when they were last in power.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 7 hours ago
      @Tony Starmer and co, like Blair and his 'eminence gris' Mandelson before them, are not socialist - they call themselves 'progressive socialists' but for want of a more accurate term, they're actually centrists. And in their turn they have gone to great lengths to purge the Labour party of any actual socialism in order to make their version of 'Labour' 'electable'.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Michael · 2 days ago
    She was all for repealing the Bedroom Tax in opposition, we await what she or the keir Starmer do now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      mrfibro · 4 hours ago
      @Michael How will or would the bedroom tax be replaced.  It's a disgraceful big earner for any government to scrap, especially now the welfare cost has blown out of proportion.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Darren · 2 days ago
    All I can say is they cannot be any worse then the evil lowlife we have had for the last 14 years
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Sam H · 2 days ago
    God help us all, she will be no different to Mel stride and his cronies, they will continue to target disabled people, they see us as a burden. Not as human beings who deserve to be treated with compassion and respect.. Just line us up an shoot us get it over with.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Eloise · 2 days ago
    It does irritate me when politicians keep trotting out the "We know work is good for mental health" soundbite. Even if true for some, what part of being "TOO ILL TO WORK" do they not understand? Not living in poverty and fear of having your pittance taken away on a whim is even better for mental health. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    TrueDefective · 2 days ago
    Here is her full contribution to the debate in 2023, quoted from above:


    In her rhetoric, she says the benefits system is "degrading". Yes it is, Liz, but I suspect her and I have different ideas on WHY. Perhaps the rampant use of sanctions as behavioural controls, leveraging our ability to pay rent and bills in order to coerce and compel, is one reason, but I suspect not to her. I suspect she thinks it is degrading to be on benefits at all, given that she also says that working provides "dignity". Ergo, we have the indignity, I suppose, of requiring support. I find this kind of talk stigmatising, and it is certainly not encouraging. 

    She's just another neoliberal that cares little for people that cannot work and absolutely RELY on their safety net remaining in place. When she says, "Work is the reason for my political party", the connotation is that they don't represent people that cannot, people like me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Alex · 1 days ago
      @TrueDefective It is degrading to be on benefits.  I don't tell any of my friends about my situation, and often feel embarrassed at parties when I have to lie when asked "so what do you do?".   I feel ashamed and pretend to run my own business.  

      I cannot find love, because if I do, they can't move in with me or they are expected to pay for my bills.  All of my money would be stopped.  And how degrading to have to ask a girl I've met to support me.  How can I ever ask that of someone?

      It makes me so full of despair that I'll never find happiness because our government won't allow us the dignity and respect we deserve. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    A · 2 days ago
    Liz Kendall is as detrimental and immoral as the Tories, if not even worse.

    When she was appointed to this same post but as a shadow, she said that she had been dreaming of holding this post for many years. I think this speaks volumes about what she might have got instore for us.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      mrfibro · 4 hours ago
      @Jam09 Yes she's a true blue, wrapped up in a devils red cloak lol.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Mandy B · 1 days ago
      @A Evil though to think and even speak those words 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rik · 2 days ago
      @Holly You just need to look at what one-time 'disability campaigner' and Labour Party member Sue Marsh said, just before she went from ESA Support Group to fulltime job with Maximus. She called for the Support Group to be scrapped; and I strongly believe this is Kendall's thinking too.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Holly · 2 days ago
      @A I was just reading an article about how they want to change universal credit its sounds like and I quote getting as getting many people of disability element of uc and those who are not on it but just uc making them do more hours so eventually we are all in work or training ect never trust politicians they change like the wind 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jam09 · 2 days ago
      @A It’s funny also labour want to end poverty and Foodbank’s as heard from Angela rayner, then Liz Kendall won’t achieve that. Sounds like a Tory in disguise. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    mrfibro · 3 days ago
    Will Labour knock the extra bedroom tax on the head ?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Fred · 1 days ago
      @Anon But, many U turns.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rik · 2 days ago
      @mrfibro No one knows for sure, but my guess would be no. The DWP under Kendall will be more of the same.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 2 days ago
      @mrfibro Nobody knows any of labour policies yet but don't expect Unicorns 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.