The Labour Party has published its manifesto today.  Astonishingly, its 136 pages provide not a single concrete action relating to welfare benefits – the issue has been almost entirely airbrushed from the document, leaving disabled claimants with no idea what Labour has in store for them.

The closest thing to an actionable idea relating to benefits is on page 78 of the manifesto, which says:

“Labour is committed to reviewing Universal Credit so that it makes work pay and tackles poverty. We want to end mass dependence on emergency food parcels, which is a moral scar on our society.”

So, a review will take place at some undefined time, but with no hint of whether the intention is to increase or reduce UC for disabled claimants, increase or reduce sanctions or anything else.

The document does say on page 42 that:

“We will tackle the backlog of Access to Work claims and give disabled people the confidence to start working without the fear of an immediate benefit reassessment if it does not work out. We believe the Work Capability Assessment is not working and needs to be reformed or replaced, alongside a proper plan to support disabled people to work.”

 But this tells readers nothing concrete. When will reform or replacement of the WCA happen and what form will it take? It sounds like Labour has no clear ideas on the subject, just a vague aspiration.

There is, though, the obligatory threat on page 42 to people who are not in work but, in the view of the Labour Party, should be:

“Labour will reform employment support so it drives growth and opportunity. Our system will be underpinned by rights and responsibilities – people who can work, should work – and there will be consequences for those who do not fulfil their obligations.”

On child poverty, the document says on page 79:

“Labour will develop an ambitious strategy to reduce child poverty. We will work with the voluntary sector, faith organisations, trade unions, business, devolved and local government, and communities to bring about change.”

This suggests that there is no intention to increase benefits payments related to children or to remove the two-child benefit cap introduced by the Tories in 2017, which has been such a driver of child poverty.

Aside from that, there is an undertaking to retain the triple lock for the state pension and a stern warning that Labour “will not tolerate fraud or waste anywhere, whether in social security or the excessive use of consultants”.

And that’s all we could find, please do tell us in the comments section if you discover anything else.

This is a cruel manifesto from the point of view of disabled claimants. 

The Conservatives put in motion some ferociously anti-disabled claimant plans, including moving forward the forced migration to universal credit, making the WCA harder to pass, consulting on replacing PIP with vouchers and spying on bank accounts.

But it will be Labour, not the Conservatives, who are virtually certain to be in charge of claimants’ fate after the election. 

Labour’s decision to give no hint of which Tory plans they will reject and which they will adopt will leave many claimants in a state of real distress for weeks to come.

You can download the Labour Party manifesto from this link.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    David Jeffery · 3 months ago
    First of all I don't trust the tories or the lib dems but now Labour has revealed their stance on welfare benefit claiments who are genuinely unable to work through serious health issues forcing them to work Starmer and labour has  lost my vote 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Bodnar · 3 months ago
      @Old mother I am finding this constant `media` scaremongering really tiring. Almost everyday there is a head line. Of vouchers will replace PIP and then you read through and it is either for Scotland or they use words like `could` or `might` and still in consultation. Also, I thought all consultation was on hold till after the election.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Old mother · 3 months ago
      @Tom Agree. I think Labour are going to study the whole system. Not just parts.  Taking a holistic view will be helpful in the long term.  

      Health is a big issue for all of us and they are going to tackle that.  Some of the increase in non-working has been due to increased waiting for nhs treatment. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Old mother · 3 months ago
      @David Jeffery Where does it say that ?  Scaremongering isn’t helpful and is dishonest. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Aw · 3 months ago
      @Not in my name That's all nonsense. Labour have propsed precisely ZERO welfare cuts. Go back to Conservative party central and hang your head in shame for targetting scared and vulnerable people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Tom · 3 months ago
      @David Jeffery Labour have said no such thing. 

      They have done 2 things so far. Distanced themselves from the 12.5 billion in cuts that the Tories proposed in their manifesto.  They have also committed to reviewing Universal Credit and more importantly tackling poverty. 

      Tackling poverty, does not translate to forcing people back into work who can't, that would increase poverty. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Steve · 3 months ago
    The problem with saying to much about welfare reform, would only make the tories jump on it, saying Labour, are soft on Welfare, scoungers, we know since 2010, that the tories, have systematically, gone after the sick, disabled, and the out of work, we can only hope, that's the
    reason for keeping it below the below the radar, fingers crossed everyone.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Darren · 3 months ago
      @Steve Yes your 💯 right remember its not just the tories who hate the poor and disabled but the right wing media do as well and they own 80% of our media.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The dogmother. · 3 months ago
      @Steve Absolutely, they have been relentless. But those with blinkers on will believe anything because it suits them to. We are all lazy good for nothing layabouts. Well I didn't chose my conditions.  But I'm stuck with them. It's not a life. If they could change that for me and give me a job that would be perfect. 
      But no let's just trounce the chronically unwell and disabled a little bit more into the ground. 
      So let's hope whoever wins listens to those who know life's no picnic.. we couldn't afford the sandwiches. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Tomkins · 3 months ago
    I agree with Aw and Claire I think the vagueness is actually because they plan on doing the opposite of the tories, but because of that classic attack of "labour are the party of benefits" there's no way he can state this without a dangerous risk of taking a hit before the election costing everyone dearly. Once in I'm sure any changes will be mild.

    Let's look at certain points that prove this, when the green paper was.launched there were 4 remarks from different labour mps including Starmer that indirectly stated what an old and stupid idea it was and typical of the Tories.

    Labour in October stated OUTRIGHT that yhey wouldn't be tightening the wca (see disability news service)

    The manifesto mentions the aim of reducing the need for foodbanks and child poverty, well with any of the Tories "ideas" virtually everyone will need a foodbank!

    Liz Kendall who is not exactly typical labour even made comments about more compassion and less fear is what's needed 

    I'm certainly not going to worry yet.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Gavin Taylor · 3 months ago
      @Tomkins I wouldn't count on it. You can make the same arguments that if Labour do good things for the disabled, then the Tories will leap on it in the next election. Since Labour literally seem to only care about winning elections, then if it becomes politically popular enough then they will go after the disabled.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Peter · 3 months ago
    I disagree that it is cruel. Cruel is making threatening policy announcements that will never see the light of day which is what we've had in recent weeks from the Tories. It makes no sense to give specific policies right now and they'll be interlinked with other government projects. As a disabled person with MH problems most importantly we have a government that listens rather than threatens... and Labour is unlikely to cut the £12 billion largely from PIP/DLA the Tories plan. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    clearwater · 3 months ago
    Re the above B&W It sounds like Labour has no clear ideas on the subject, just a vague aspiration.

    I think they do have plans but are just not revealing them, i dont trust labour ( or Cons, Lib, Reform )
    all are a  sly bunch, Starmers has always guarded & non commital.    
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Aw · 3 months ago
    In the Guardian this morning it was pointed out that the difference between money saved and money spent was exactly the same as the amount needed to remove the 2 child limit. It was strongly suggested that it was an open secret that they plan to do this, and I think the references to reversing child poverty and removing the need for food banks heavily hints at this also. They can't say it outright because of the right wing press.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Claire · 3 months ago
    The way I see it is Starmer has to be very careful with any major policy announcements.Conservatives have painted disabled and sick as fraudsters and shirkers and would never get my vote.Cameron and Osborne changed the original WCA to become very much harder just after entering office.I remember the strivers versus shirkers rhetoric and it went on for years.Much of the right wing press absolutely welcome this as do their readers.Not until someone they know becomes chronically sick or disabled or themselves,do they understand.Universal credit was supposed to be the benefit to change everything,hence IDS punching the air with glee!Probably take years to set up yet another change,I think we have to be glad the Tory reforms will not likely go through.Hope a whole new government will see reassessments as pointless and give us the dignity we deserve.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Laura · 3 months ago
      @Claire Well said Claire, they say you can judge a society on how they treat their vulnerable and every vulnerable section of society has been treated appallingly by the Tories. These people can't possibly relate to the common man on the street or understand the hurt it causes struggling disabled people shirkers and not working a lifestyle choice. I just pray if Labour gets in they show a bit of respect, compassion and empathy which goes a long way.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Old mother · 3 months ago
      @Claire Well said. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    phil · 3 months ago
    Where's the imagination in any of these manifestos ? There used to be a section in benefits claim forms where you were able to state how long it is since you had a job/work routine and how you felt about your ability/motivation regarding work/career/training/education etc.
    This section should be returned as it deals with reality. The removal of this ushered in the era of fantasy, which was painted as "not writing anyone off". What's needed is an advisory panel on the reality of long term unemployment, whether considered disabled or not. The private sector will not employ the long term unemployed. The current unimaginative rhetoric just reinforces negativity around economic inactivity.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Mimi · 3 months ago
    As someone who suffers from multiple mental health disabilities and can’t even leave the house due to severe panic attacks OCD and BPD. I rely on my PIP as I do not and cannot work. This is maddening and anxiety inducing to think that the only means I have of living is at risk. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      T · 3 months ago
      @Nancy I think the not knowing what they plan to do is worse because we are stuck in a limbo and you can't help but worry constantly that they are keeping silent for sinister reasons... I'll keep praying I'm wrong though and hope that they are simply keeping quiet to stop the Tories and their friends from going on about them being soft on us.  It's just cruel that they didn't give us just at least a tiny bit of hope on something regarding pip or esa/universal credit. 
        I don't want to vote labour but I feel I need to because it would be a waste of vote if I voted greens or lib Dems,, but I know I'll hate myself if I voted labour and they end up equally cruel as the Tories..  
        This should be a time now for us to be happy and celebrate finally getting rid of the nasty party but we can't, it's not right. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Nancy · 3 months ago
      @T I was hoping to hear something positive today as well. I have agoraphobia, anxiety, depression and other chronic health issues. I'm terrified of moving over to universal credit and the voucher scheme! My daughter is my fulltime carer and only gets her carers allowance, we will not be able to live without pip. I wish labour would say something concrete about pip.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Elizabeth · 3 months ago
      @Mimi Conservatives are the only worry if you're on pip. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Edwards · 3 months ago
      @D king They won't ever Implement vouchers,noone would want to take them and they know it,it's more likely they want to cut claimants numbers by any means they can,the most severely disabled will be ok,in my opinion it would likely be the people who are bed bound or have serious learning disabilities, the rest of us will not be on pip any more and probably cut off from sickness payments and told to find work, as an agoraphobic myself this is personally terrifying,I also have neurological problems,dysmotility and a liver that doesn't work very well despite me never ever drinking alcohol and not being overweight either ,I will not be voting,not even postal because I can not seriously look at any party as having any support for us,I think disability benefits in the future will no longer exist and as usual after the outcry everyone will forget about us and it will become normal, there will only be 1 benefit, universal credit or it's replacement and that will come with all the requirements and sanctions it has now.i just can not see a way through this mess

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      T · 3 months ago
      @Diane Thank you Diane for your help . I really appreciate it. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Moses · 3 months ago
    I don't trust  labour at all either
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Tom · 3 months ago
    All seems like a shambles very very vague I really don’t know I would guess they will reduce the 5 week wait(even though I hear it’s a 3 month wait these days) for first uc payment might get bit more money too for the sick and disabled they might introduce that try part time job and no medicals again thing and for the job seekers think things will stay the same as now no mention of esa-uc forced migration either so off to enjoy the football and the summer and will try to forget for now 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    bobtehbuilder · 3 months ago
    i had hoped they'd do something involving permitted/self-employed work to make it less hassle to try and/or used as therapeutic work.
    as you say, the manifesto doesnt seem to say anything about what they would do in any detail, from what i know of labour policies in the past they used to push jobseekers quite hard to get a job and im sure the same theme will be continued. labour created the original WCA but left office around the same time as it was hammering disabled people in a horrible way, i cant even guess how they will approach it.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Syl · 3 months ago
    Makes me think that any changes are going to be superficial and they intend to run on with the current system. Otherwise, why not set it out in the Manifesto? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jen · 3 months ago
      @Syl We can trust any of the two major parties! Fill out the PIP consultation/green paper to let them know how you feel!
      They haven’t mentioned where they’ll get the money from, for lots of thing, but they say that all of their spending is costed! Let’s hope that it’s not reducing the cost of PIP, by removing it!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Aw · 3 months ago
      @Syl Because they need the swing votes and they can't give the right wing press any ammunition before the election. Your stereotypical Tory or red wall undecided voter hates benefit claimants...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Not in my name · 3 months ago
    Labour will end up same as Tories. I am voted LD
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 3 months ago
      @Not in my name Quite aside from the issue of if you can even trust the Lib Dems in the first place, they will never get enough numbers to form a government on their own. Your vote will therefore only count at all if there is a hung parliament, where the Lib Dems are most likely to ally themselves with one of the bigger players as they did in 2010. So either way, in the end you will still get either the tories or (more likely this time) Labour as senior governing partner who will dictate the terms of any coalition government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Alicia Mitchell · 3 months ago
      @Not in my name Thank goodness! Someone who like me will vote Lib Dem’s due to thier commitment to benefits. I do hope someone with a big social media following shares all this as I fear labour will win purely because people will vote them without looking into what they are going to provide or not provide. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Ginger · 3 months ago
      @Holly Because they'll never get in so they can promise what they like...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Holly · 3 months ago
      @Not in my name The green party's plans look good
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    CaroA · 3 months ago
    Thanks benefits and work for your swift publishing of this.  The manifesto with regards to this leaves a load of confusion in its wake.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 3 months ago
    And there you have it, Labour will be just as bad, if not worse, than the Tories. Not detailing their plans on welfare before the election probably means there's some nasty surprises for claimants expecting better.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 3 months ago
      @Aw I'm afraid that's not true - Starmer is most definitely NOT a socialist. He has in fact done his utmost to purge socialism entirely from the Labour party. He is, at the very best, a centrist (which admittedly is still far preferable to him being a tory).

      The most we can say (for now) is that there is at least some hope that he might not crucify us like the tories would.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Emma · 3 months ago
      @Anon Labour won't be worse. They might not be offering close to what we want or what is needed, but they won't be worse than the Conservative Party. Their hands are tied, because of the billionaire-owned, right wing press. If they showed any sign of being kinder to people on benefits (other than pensioners) the press would start to rip them to shreds. Not detailing their plans could just as easily mean good surprises as bad. 

      Disappointing about them not removing the two child cap though, although they have consistently said that they weren't going to.  Maybe there will be a post-election u-turn on this. Fingers crossed!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Aw · 3 months ago
      @Anon Absolutely NOT. We KNOW the Tories want us gone, Starmer is a socialist, albeit a secret one atm, he categorically will NOT crucify us like the Tories have already said they will. Do you work for Conservative HQ?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Catherine Bibby · 3 months ago
    I my self could not find any information in regards of plans about the welfare system other than the points outlined by yourselves. This is very worrying for me and all of us. Last year I was awarded 10 years for PIP, I was so relieved as I reach pension age next year. Had hope with a Labour government victory...now just as much filled with dread. Sick of living a life on my nerves and uncertainty 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Claire · 3 months ago
      @Catherine Bibby If you are getting to pension age next year plus 10 year pip award you will be just fine.Do not worry.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    blandie · 3 months ago
    There are supposedly 3.5 million PIP claimants and I think all should vote as it will make a statement. We are thinking of voting Green or Labour, but have not yet decided. Please do vote for someone, don't just think it's only one vote, it does not matter.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    T · 3 months ago
    Labour has simply left us all in limbo with no relief, I'm not surprised with starmer. Disgusting,,, I'll still have to vote for them and prolong more worry of not knowing .. we should have all been able to smile today or at least feel some of this burden of worry and constant panic...  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 3 months ago
      @Simon "At least vote for a party that you believe in."

      What if there isn't a party that I believe in ?


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Truethinker · 3 months ago
      @T You need to grill your local labour candidate and find out what they are doing for the ill and disabled claiments it is the only eay
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Simon · 3 months ago
      @T Why on earth would you vote for someone that hasn't even told you the policy that affects you the most?

      This is just crazy!  At least vote for a party that you believe in. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Rik · 3 months ago
    They will keep all the Conservative plans. The last Labour govt introduced the original WCA. Along with the "think the unthinkable" attitude towards disabled people. I think we'll see PIP become means tested or reduced to 'support' from approved providers. And a new WCA that sees very few disabled people qualify for higher rate benefits. Remember how the former campaigner Sue Marsh said there shouldn't be a support category for disabled benefits, that era is coming.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact