Labour ministers have resorted to online scam techniques to try to force their PIP and UC cuts through the Commons on Tuesday. And there’s a strong chance that their dubious promise to exempt current claimants from the cuts is, in reality, only a two year reprieve.

But its not too late to for you to try to stop them, as one MP has confirmed.

Blank cheque

Ordinarily MPs would know what they were agreeing to when a bill is presented for its first vote. 

And if they do vote in favour, there is then a committee stage at which a group of MPs look at possible amendments, consult with experts - -such as disability groups in this case – before presenting amendments to be considered by the whole House. 

This process usually takes weeks or, for a bill that will affect millions of people like this one, even months.

There is then a final vote on the amended bill, at what is called the third reading.  But it’s incredibly rare for the government to lose at this stage – the last time it happened was 48 years ago

After the final vote, the bill goes to the Lords, to be carefully scrutinised again.

But in the case of Tuesday’s bill, MPs won’t actually know what they are voting for. 

Because ministers have promised there will be amendments which will exempt all current claimants, but they probably won’t even have been published by Tuesday.

MPs will just have to trust ministers who say that what they are actually voting for – the 4 point rule applying to all claimants – is not what will really happen.

Chaotic few hours

And then, a week after Tuesday’s vote, the entire months long committee stage will be shrunk into a few chaotic hours in front of the whole house, voting on amendments they have barely seen and with no chance to get advice from experts.

And, what is more, the government have applied to have the bill certified as a money bill.  If the Speaker agrees, then the Lords will have no power to change any of it.  Even if they do try, it will automatically be passed without change after one month.

Online scammers

Isn’t this exactly how online scammers work? 

Promise to save you from losing all your money as long as you hand over your account details immediately.  Quickly, quickly.  No time to talk to anyone, don’t hang up the phone, do it now or it will be too late. You’ll lose everything.

And yet, in reality even if the PIP cuts are put into law this month, they don’t actually take effect until November 2026. That’s sixteen months from now.

So, why can’t they be properly discussed and put into a separate piece of legislation next year?

Unless Labour have things to hide.

Labour’s dodgy promise

Labour’s promise to exempt all current claimants from the PIP and UC cuts may not be all it seems.

Kendall’s letter says that in relation to PIP, “The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only.”

But she says nothing about what happens in 2028, when disability minister Stephen Timms has finished rewriting the PIP eligibility criteria and the new rules are put into law. 

Labour says the new PIP rules will be coproduced with disability organisations.  But who honestly believes those groups will be given a veto on anything, especially with the government determined to cut costs?

So, if Timms decides that the four-point rule is a good one and should stay, then under the terms of Kendall’s letter, it will apply to current claimants from 2028.

Kendall also says “we will adjust the pathway of universal credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element . . .  have their incomes fully protected in real terms.”

But she doesn’t say what will happen in 2028, when the work capability assessment is abolished and only claimants with an award of PIP daily living component are eligible for the UC health element. 

If current claimants are not exempt from this change as well, then 600,000 who don’t get PIP daily living will no longer have their income protected.  And if the PIP four point rule is also incorporated in the new PIP assessment from 2028, then hundreds of thousands more current claimants who don’t get four points, will lose their health element when they lose their PIP.

Contacting your MP will make a difference

Now, none of this may be what ministers intend.  But MPs voting on Tuesday won’t have a clue what they do intend, because the whole process has become a chaotic shambles – in spite of the fact it has the power to plunge hundreds of thousands of disabled people into poverty.

So, please consider contacting your MP and asking them to vote for a planned Labour amendment – which, ironically none of us has seen yet – which will give MPs more time to consider the cuts.  And if that fails, then vote against the bill in its entirety.

You won’t be wasting your time.  There are still rumoured to be 50 or 60 determined Labour rebels, with many more unsure what to do.

And, as one MP told the BBC yesterday,

"it shouldn't be underestimated the potential effect of a weekend of emails from constituents, constituency surgeries etc".

Let yours be one of them.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    The concessions mentioned exclude current claimants for the pip points rule and the health element of uc. But in reality are the dwp going to find ways to get more people off uc and pip by using the assessment in the curent form to squeeze more people off benefits.  Then will existing claimants be classed as new claimants and the new rules be applied to them. It feels like this maybe  the loop hole they use. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Just one in five voters want disability benefits cut in fresh blow for Starmer
    The public agrees in principle that welfare spending should come down but wants disability benefits to be protected.  

    The survey for The i Paper by BMG Research suggests that a large number of people believe the overall benefits bill is too high, as ministers have argued.

    But asked about specific types of welfare spending, voters are more supportive – with disability benefits such as the personal independence payment (PIP) the most popular category other than pensions.

    Starmer has insisted it is essential to control spending on working-age benefits, which has ballooned since the Covid-19 pandemic. He will hold a vote this week on cuts to PIP and incapacity benefits for those unable to work because of a disability, having watered down the Government’s previous plans in order to limit the size of a rebellion by Labour MPs which had threatened to sink the policy.

    The Prime Minister told the Sunday Times that he took personal responsibility for the belated U-turn, which arose only after more than 100 backbenchers publicly opposed the bill, and suggested it was because he had been focussed on the recent G7 and Nato summits, as well as the brief bombing war between Israel and Iran.

    He said: “I’m putting this as context rather than excuse: I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend. I turned my attention fully to it when I got back from Nato on Wednesday night. Obviously in the course of the early part of this week we were busy trying to make sure Nato was a success.”

    Starmer added: “Would I rather have been able to get to a constructive package with colleagues earlier? Yeah, I would.” But he insisted that “getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn’t necessarily achieve the desired outcome”.

    Overall, 41 per cent of voters believe that benefits spending is too high, with only 19 per cent thinking it is too low.

    When questioned on the different categories of welfare, however, the public is much more supportive of spending. On disability benefits specifically, just 19 per cent say the Government is spending too much with 36 per cent wanting to see the budget increased and 28 per cent saying the current level is about right.

    Similarly on universal credit, sickness benefit, housing benefit and welfare aimed at families, there is net support for higher rather than lower spending, although by a smaller margin than for disability benefits. Only the state pension is more popular, with 48 per cent calling for more money and 10 per cent saying too much is now being spent.

    The public seems to be broadly split when asked about the details of the Government’s reforms, which would make it harder to claim PIP – a payment available to disabled people whether or not they are in work – and reduce incapacity benefits. On the two-child benefit cap, which many Labour MPs want to see scrapped later this year, 44 per cent of voters want to keep it while 31 per cent would prefer to remove it.

    Robert Struthers of BMG said: “The public’s views on welfare are complex, with important nuances. Ask about the benefits bill overall, and most say it’s too high. But dig into disability benefits or sickness payments, and the public is more divided. It sounds inconsistent, but it reflects reality: it’s easier to call for cuts in the abstract, harder when faced with who would lose out.

    “You could argue the climbdown from Starmer is a pragmatic attempt to find a middle ground on a tough issue where opinion is generally split. The problem? Voters don’t just judge policies, they also judge competence. And for many, the broader picture will simply be more Labour in chaos and yet another U-turn.”

    BMG Research interviewed a representative sample of 1,617 GB adults online between 24-25 June May 2025. BMG Research is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.



    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/one-in-five-voters-disability-benefits-cut-starmer-3777040
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Pens Starmer is, very obviously to us claimants, lying when he gives his excuse about being distracted by foreign affairs. Backbenchers have been trying to be heard for many weeks. Very lame.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I've asked my MP to still vote against these immoral and indefensible cuts 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    The papers are reporting that Reeves is going to freeze income tax thresholds next year to fund the U turn on reducing disability benefits eligibility for existing recipients. So blatantly telling workers you are going to have to pay higher taxes to fund the far too many people claiming they cannot work when they could do some work. Reeves will no doubt latter express surprise and shock as disability hate crime continues to rise. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @John PIP recipients are often income tax payers through work a and/ or interest from savings.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @John She’s already frozen the income tax thresholds to 2028/29.

      She’s probably going to continue freezing income tax thresholds until 2030 at least, but like you say it will framed to create a divide between those who work and those who are receiving pip which is not an out of work benefit but they don’t really like to say that there are thousands of people who work who are entitled to & receive pip.

      Further stigmatising disabled and ill claimants. I really wish they would act not to discriminate us all further with this divisive rhetoric .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    The politicians spout lies about spiralling cost, people taking the mickey with vast numbers claiming to be incapable of work when there is nothing really wrong with them or they could do some work, and overly easy to claim overly generous benefits letting people get money for nothing. And the media not only does not call out and challenge the lies it promotes the lies as truth. We have had decades of TV, radio, newspapers and social media spreading anti people on welfare including those on disability benefits narratives. Portraying fraud as endemic, and the "genuine" as lazy feckless undesirable maligners, and the "real genuine" as getting overly generous support and being an unaffordable burden. To the point all three political parties highest in the polls and the public in general accept it as a moral good to reduce eligibility for disability benefits, reduce the amount paid to the disabled, and to increase conditionality and sanctions on the disabled. As to be disabled is to choose to engage in a aberrant lifestyle choice. And disability hate crime rises year on year. Meanwhile assisted dying is sold as a moral good and if legalized the UK will undoubtedly follow the path of other nations and rapidly expand eligibility for assisted dying to the non terminally ill disabled. The narrative our politicians and media spread and our direction of travel as a nation is dire. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Nadia Whittome, MP

    These points still stand -
    -    No formal consultation with disabled people
    -    No government impact statement
    -    No OBR analysis

    Less than 24 hours for MPs to decide – and they may need to vote on the basis verbal promises.

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLcY9YJio6M/
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 hours ago
    When I look at the Pathways to Work green paper it is not just the loss of money that makes me fear for people it is people becoming subject to the conditionality and sanctions regimes.

    PIP is exempt from sanctioning, and for income replacement benefits ESA/ UC disability/health premiums are exempt. And being in receipt of the disability/health premiums results in no or less conditionality.

    The changes to PIP and UC health eligibility will result in vast numbers of disabled people who would have been eligible for PIP and ESA/UC disability/health premiums not being eligible. And for those eligible for UC health/LCWRA the government is planning at increasing conditionality and sanctions at first only support conversation but latter expanding conditionality if too few people take up the advice and help towards and into work.

    As vast numbers of ill and disabled people become subject to conditional and sanctions looking at the condition insight reports for medical conditions used by the DWP subcontractors does not inspire confidence. In the likely competence of the DWP in deciding what activities to mandate and if to sanction people for non compliance.

    The current UC conditionality and sanctions regime is terrifying. Conditionality can include actively looking for work 35 hours a week, attending the job centre daily, non time limited unpaid work placements. For repeat offenders sanctions can be up to 182 days long and for first time offenses sanctions can be open ended until the claimant complies. Those sanctioned can be not eligible for hardship payments until they comply. Hardship payments have to be applied for and are are loan. And it was proposed but I do not know if it has been implemented that those sanctioned for more than 6 months could have their benefit claim closed. Losing their housing element and edibility for hardship payments, and all passported eligibility like free prescriptions and refunds of NHS hospital travel costs.

    And unless things have changed recently when the DWP looks at its own implementation of its conditionality and sanctions regimes. It finds it often sanctions people for non sanctionable things, fails to follow procedure as far warnings before sanctioning, fails to follow safeguarding procedures before recommending sanctions, fails to supply the decision maker with the reason the claimant gives for non compliance. And disproportionately sanctions disabled people especially those with learning disabilities for non compliance.

    And the DWP under Labour do not appear to currently be trying to reduce sanctioning to only being used sparingly as a last resort. Quite the opposite they have hit record levels of sanctioning.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @tintack You will not have to check out @tintack, you have too many friends 😘
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @tintack @tintack I’m feeling like that already currently on uc lcw waiting for a wca 2017 reacessment it’s horrible the 4 weekly meetings with a work coach the stress and anxiety make me have dark thoughts constantly then theirs the bullying to look for part time work or voluntry work the threats the extreme pressure 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @john This is what has terrified me right from the start. I'm 90% housebound because I'm too ill to go out. I can't work without it making me more ill. I can't look for work without it making me more ill. Continued stress pushes me into irreversible relapse. I'm now in constant pain just from the stress of being made homeless and bullied by a council who wanted me to just sleep rough. I dread to think what would happen to me if I was forced to seek work or lose everything. It would definitely result in my death, I don't want to be alive most of the time anyway. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @john
      "And for those eligible for UC health/LCWRA the government is planning at increasing conditionality and sanctions at first only support conversation but latter expanding conditionality if too few people take up the advice and help towards and into work."

      As things stand it is only possible to get LCWRA by going through a WCA and being classed as unfit for work. If they are going to try applying conditionality to people who have been found unfit for work I cannot see how that can possibly work. Trying to force people into work who have already been found unfit for work is utterly insane. It's probably academic anyway, because we don't know what is going to happen in 2028 and we probably won't have any clarity on what will happen to current LCWRA claimants until the WCA abolition legislation comes forward. At that point there may well be another rebellion, so it's impossible to say what will come out of that process.

      From my own point of view, if they do reassess existing UC Health recipients under the new PIP-based system I would lose UC Health and as a result I would not have enough to survive. If I were then subject to a conditionality regime I could not possibly meet then I would have no income at all. Whether I have no income or not enough to survive on makes little difference: I won't survive either way. If that scenario becomes reality I would not want to be here and that would be the time to check out. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @john Agreed.

      I think it’s important we all keep on contacting those in government with our concerns.

      I still question point 5.4 - because it is linked to point 3 -
      “The Secretary of State may make transitional or saving provision”.

      https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/59-01/0267/240267.pdf
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    Does anyone know if kemi badenoch has said how the tories will vote on Tuesday? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @tinytim The Tories want to target those claiming for mental health conditions excluding those with learning disabilities or autism or psychosis. The Tories want to remove PIP and UC health eligibility from those with mental health conditions at least those who are not on enhanced rate PIP awards. They particularly think most of those receiving benefits due to depression, anxiety or ADHD should not get benefits. Cutting a total of £7.5billion from disability/incapacity benefits.

      They also want to reduce the diagnosis of people as having mental health conditions by changing diagnosis guidelines and which conditions are acknowledged as medical conditions. And for those with mental health conditions including those with severe mental illness want to replace prescribing medicines with social prescribing and talking therapies. Which gives the impression they don't think mental health conditions are medical conditions with physiological causes. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Anon Against as the bill according to Kemi does not cut welfare enough and the government will not commit to not increasing taxes. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Anon Kemi Badenoch is worse than labour she thinks the cuts are not enough.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    So what happens if they say about the changes and gets voted through and then dont do it because these Ministers lie through their teeth
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Simon
      At the 3rd reading of the bill the government's concessions should be amendments on the face of the bill. In the text of the primary legislation. That can only be changed in future by a debate and vote in parliament.

      18th June
      1st reading of the bill. The bill is announced to the commons and published.

      27th June
      Parliamentary briefing paper for the bill published to give MPs context.

      1st July
      2nd reading of the bill. Does the commons agree with the general principles/objective of the bill. Short debate and vote on the bill. No amendments to the bill are tabled or voted on.

      9th July
      Committee stage. The bill is looked through line by line.
      Reporting stage. The commons debates the bill in detail, amendments are tabled and voted on.
      3rd reading of the bill as amended. Short debate and vote on if to pass the bill.

      Bill goes to the Lords. If it is a money bill the Lords cannot amend the bill and if the Lords do not pass the bill it still goes to royal ascent 1 month after going to the Lords as it is purely within the commons financial privilege.   


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Simon that's what will happen. it's a con trick
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    I still unsure if these sweeteners to the proposed changes mean UC LCWRA-only claimants will have to start claiming PIP to continue getting UC or not. It's ridiculous that I have to claim a benefit I don't need in order to get a benefit I do need.

    With any luck, enough MPs will vote against the bill and that should be the ousting of Starmer by the end of next week. We may have our own 4th of July celebrations coming up.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Ajohnymous Interesting point @Ajohnymous, and that's what people are driven to - like claiming big chunks of lovely pension credit they'd never thought to claim, because Rachel told them that was the only way they'd get a few hundred quid winter fuel allowance. No wonder the welfare bill is high. You can only get this little top up of you claim this wad. Ok, I'll claim the wad then, ta.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Ajohnymous
      "I still unsure if these sweeteners to the proposed changes mean UC LCWRA-only claimants will have to start claiming PIP to continue getting UC or not"

      I don't think we will know the answer to that until the WCA abolition legislation comes forward. When Labour MPs realise that making UC Health dependent on PIP daily living means a huge number of people will lose out - 600,000 of us who currently get UC Health but not PIP plus however many people who do currently get PIP daily living but will lose it under the new criteria - there is a distinct possibility of another major rebellion. What that would produce is impossible to say at present.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Ajohnymous I sincerely hope so!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    The UNITE article highlights something forgotten in this latest furore - the lack of support.for young people still in the proposals, not just for new claimants:

    "The government’s latest plans for disabled benefits cuts are divisive and sinister. Creating a two-tier system where younger disabled people and those who become disabled in the future will be disadvantaged and denied access to work and education, is morally wrong.

    “We need a system which ensures that disabled people get the support they need to enter the workplace and receive an education, the government’s plans specifically prevent this happening."

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.unitetheunion.org/news-events/news/2025/june/government-welfare-plans-create-unfair-two-tier-system-unite&ved=2ahUKEwiYzuzJtZWOAxW0WEEAHVYfFyIQxfQBKAB6BAgHEAE&usg=AOvVaw2-3dg_PaFy65ozL6rBKr01
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    https://t.co/niIv1hfEuE

    I would raise a glass to mcsweeney getting axed
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Do we really TRUST these MUPPETS in charge?

    Because it sounds like on the 2nd reading of the bill on the 1st July 

    MP's will really not know what there voting for.

    The concessions made will not be ready to read in time (apparently)

    No third reading as it could take months. They will vote then a few hours later will get the results. Also have asked to be a money bill !!!!!

    No clarification on what happen in 2028 when the WCA get scrapped, 
    Will existing claimants just transfer to the new health element or be reassessed. WHO KNOWS, 

    Just seems to be a lot a trust and why the rush to get this bill passed? 

    Not sure about anyone else but I don't trust anything the MUPPETS say. Cos they all Lie lie lie lie oh yes lie.......

    Also will they ramp up existing claimants for assessments?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    One day to go. Sign, share, copy and paste. Get the numbers up. Yes I am repeating myself, I can't sleep. Instead of feeling helpless and desperate, i try to take action whenever I can. This is so important, so, sorry gotta keep trying. Every little thing can help. It certainly can't do any harm. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    See Starmer was back out tonight trotting out the same lines..... protect the most vulnerable but those who can work should.....

    Can I ask exactly at what stage did PIP become an OUT OF WORK benefit- i must have missed that? 

    I'm still struggling to comprehend how cutting hundreds of thousands of peoples lifelines will help get people into work? 

    Lastly have any of you read the transcript of Timms in front of the committee last week...... spending on the welfare state is still at 5% of gdp exactly were it's been over the blast decade.... liars the lot of them saying things are spiralling. The increase in pip claimants he also admitted is most likely related to government policy.... ie- increase in pension age, nhs waiting times, and people have probably always been eligible but cost of living crisis mean they're actually applying. 


    LIARS....... THE LOT OF THEM!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @shadowpony @shadowpony, Well done you. I don't think the general public, or the media, or the government have got a hold of any of this
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @Arthritic Annie I had phone into radio 4's any answers to correct Anita Anand when she said pip was an out of work beneifit. they broadcast my correction to their assertion. this is on any ansers on radio 4 on saturday 28 june 2025, I don't get on air on this one, but the phone staff did take my correction seriously. good on r4 for doing this. the reason why the govt fudge what pip is for? so people think pip is an out of work beneifit. tell people it is, and those who dont claim it will put pressure on govt to cut it. and there was a misaprehension on r4, any answers, that when you got into work, you stopped claiming pip, erhrhrh no. I squashed that too, though don't know if it made to aair, as was squeashing things in realtime from my phone in suffolk.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Arthritic Annie
      "I'm still struggling to comprehend how cutting hundreds of thousands of peoples lifelines will help get people into work?"
      DWP officials themselves say it wont: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9w1p44vzleo
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Arthritic Annie Very sadly I think all the parties are as bad as each other. The Tories and reform will be even worse. It's not good. I don't even know what to do anymore. Keep on keeping on and trying. I know that's really not going to be much consolation to people, but I am really trying to stay positive with every fibre in my body. 😡 I have to, got a child to live for, all thats keeping me going.  Still we're here for each other on Here.. And I'm not ashamed to admit that I will ring helplines if absolutely necessary. Except the crisis team. Awful lot. There are no words to describe how dreadful they are. At least not words I can use on this forum, if you get my meaning? They have actually caused me more harm. I won't ever use them again. I've done the whole waiting patiently in A &E for 12 hours plus. I got 5 minutes with 2 kids, younger than my 26 year old daughter. Told to contact doctor the next day, a week for an appointment. And on and on again. I'm sure there will be people on here who can relate! Its cool, only
      Had 30 years of this bully crap. I,m 44 years old. Hey ho. Anyhow stay strong. Love and light to you all. Keep on the fight. Round 100 ding ding ! 🤣 I joke because I have too, otherwise I'd lose my mind completely, been  there, don't fancy doing it again. I know it's far from funny. Just how I cope. Please excuse me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Arthritic Annie Thank you Arthritic Annie, well said. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    Iain Duncan Smith had written an interesting piece for the Telegraph.  He was the "brains" behind Universal Credit, and famously resigned from government when the financial element of the LCW group was removed by whoever was the Chancellor at the time.   Interestingly, the existing claimants continued to get it, but new claimants didn't.  IDS stated back in March on Politics Live that he wouldn't vote for the new bill because he didn't believe in taking money from the disabled.    Anyway, here's his piece from the Telegraph.  

    As an aside http://archive.ph is a way of seeing news articles behind paywalls.  If you need to use it for an article you find, open a new tab, put the archive url in and then follow the basic instructions. 

    https://archive.ph/iDTLB
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @SLB If even Iain Duncan Smith is balking at the bill... you know it's real bad.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    From Tom scotson on twitter:

    Labour MP Rachel Maskell is asking MPs to sign a new *reasoned amendment* to block the welfare reform bill

    Maskell's new amendment rejects the bill because:

    — No consultation with disabled groups
    — OBR will not analyse impact of reforms until late 2025
    — Employment funding will not be ready until end of decade
    — No government impact assessment
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    About these amendments, if they do not present them to the Commons floor by Tuesday, will the vote be pulled?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Phil C No, they can’t amend the wording by Tuesday so are asking MPs to vote for it with a promise it will be amended by 3rd reading I think 🤔
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    Is there a list of Mp's who are still voting against it.Hopefully mine is still on it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @Dee please publish list.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Fiona I would really like to see this as well. I think everyone is trying to organise at the moment. I think MPs are rethinking their next move if they were not strongly against based on public contacting them out of worry.