Liz Kendall has been sacked as secretary of state for work and pensions in Labour’s cabinet reshuffle, following the resignation of Angela Rayner. Kendall has become science secretary and been replaced at the DWP by Pat McFadden.

Mc Fadden has been an MP since 2005.

He was Minister of State for Business, Innovation and Skills under Gordon Brown.

He was also a show cabinet minister under Ed Miliband and under Jeremy Corbyn, who later sacked him for alleged disloyalty.

He was reappointed to the shadow cabinet under Keir Starmer and was appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations when Starmer became PM.

McFadden is seen as being on the right of the Labour party.

His voting record on welfare benefits has generally been in favour of increasing benefits for sick and disabled claimants and against cuts in welfare spending.

But if readers are wondering how different from his predecessor he will be, it’s worth noting that McFadden nominated Liz Kendall for her bid for the Labour leadership in 2015.

It is also being widely reported that Skills is being taken from the Department for Education and handed to the DWP, making it an even larger and more powerful ministry.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 45 minutes ago
    It's a pity that Timms didn't get re shuffled as well........
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    If Kendall was the cruella de vil of ministers as fictional villains does that make McFadden the T1000.


    McFadden over the past year has been the go to minister Labour leadership has shipped out for morning briefings. His wife is Morgan mcsweeney (aka the Labour Dominic Cummings, aka Labour chief puppet master) number 2 and many media outlets call him the most powerful politician you’ve never heard of.

    Liz Kendall was a nasty piece of work but McFadden is almost android like in comparison (when comparing human traits such as empathy and compassion - a harsh statement but those are the vibes I get)

    What this move says is that the Labour higher ups didn’t trust Kendall with the second attempt at welfare cuts so have now put mcsweeneys personal assassin/well trained attack dog in charge

    Basically mcsweeney is now in full control of dwp and welfare cuts have been made an even bigger priority than before (the dirty tricks of forcing through the universal credit bill in record speed may feel like child’s play in comparison to what we could have coming)

    To summarise the summer is over, winter is coming and Labour leadership has deployed 2 white walker kings in McFadden and timms to deal with us disabled.

    Hope everyone’s rested enough over the summer for the sequel
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    I'm not sure policies will change one way or the other - they might have done if, for example, one of the disabled MPs was given the job.  But this is continuation politics, really.  Which is what I don't get about the reshuffle.  It's the same old faces playing musical chairs.  There's no great promotions or backbenchers coming forward, and that suggests how few good MPs there are in parliament just now, no matter what side of politics they belong to.  

    But as Titan has said in their comment, the current biggest worry is Reform.  If they get in 2029, we're all completely and utterly stuffed.  And that's our problem.  We have no faith in Labour, but almost every viable option is worse.  Corbyn's party will probably never get off the ground.  The Greens need to get more vocal if they are going to make inroads, and the LibDems have 70 MPs, but are doing nothing with them.

    Can Reform really get a majority?  It's nearly four years to the election, and so it's hard to tell.  But it seems potentially doable.  BUT, one look (and listen) at their conference shows they are not competing with the main parties.  A two day conference is less than the so-called main parties.  Farage's speech was fine, if you don't want details on how he and his party will do anything he's promising.   He has promised to stop the boats within two weeks of gaining office - well, his friend Trump promised to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours, and that didn't work so well.   And then there was Andrea Jenkyns singing a song called Insomnia - hardly the right title for a song given it was the end of a day of political speeches.  There's plenty of time for Reform to implode.  And for that reason, I don't object to the amount of airtime they are getting, as it gives more chance for them to do something stupid.  

    If the polls are correct, Reform would get an 80 seat majority.  Unfortunately, I think we have to hope for Reform to screw up, as there's not much chance at the moment of Labour or the Tories bouncing back.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    DWP is a poisoned chalice for whoever runs it and is only trumped by Home Office. 
    None of the MPs have any clue about any of the departments they run and that’s not new or limited to Labour. 
    The success or failure of any department is down to the advisers in the background.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Oh goodness, no. More cuts on the way.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Cathedral city We are totally broke with no growth and increasing taxation. We spend far more than we are able to earn. Run on the £? We are stuffed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    I found Liz Kendall rather offensive. I am referring to her portrait pictures taken - the forlorn look which was quite unbecoming but epitomised her condescending, yet, draconian and satanic stance towards the disabled. It does not worry me about Pat McFadden. All of the politicians are the same, they all come out of the same mould / mold especially as it seems the younger generation of Labour MP's who are Oxbridge certainly do, will try to achieve much the same as Liz Kendall. I am not unhappy to see Liz Kendall go. 
    What is worrying is the support that is growing for Reform UK, they are pledging to make much greater cutbacks to disability benefits if they are elected into power. 
    If the current Labour Government follows through on a more compassionate approach  vector through the Timms review (which is unlikely) it may well be a short lived victory for disabled people in the event that Labour is then voted out of power shortly afterwards. 
    Reform are looking to implement even deeper cuts to disability benefits. What needs to happen, is the legislation that is agreed upon between Timms, the disability fraternity, charities and organisations working in favour of the disabled, ensures built in protection from future cuts in the event a different government is elected in the forthcoming general election. This would at least make it difficult for Reform to implement policies that are even more inhumane than the current Labour Government. Any cuts, any legislation should be protected for at least 10 years after it is agreed upon. If protection can be given through the triple lock for pensioners, then why can't disabled people have this as well?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 minutes ago
      @Moose Asylum seekers however are not illegal, Their method of arrival is irregular and 78% of them will be accepted as refugees. Of the total migrants the boat asylum seekers make up only 4% of all migrants. So if you take 78% of 4% you get slightly less then 1 percent who will be not given refugee status and sent back to their country of origin. This whole issue has been a false trumpet designed to make British citizens give up their human rights in order to stop the boats! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Moose I’m sorry Nigel Farage has said previously, “Yes, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has stated that his party would make "serious cuts" to the UK's welfare budget if they win the next election. He argues that it is unfair for those who work and pay taxes to support those who choose not to work.
      leftfootforward.org”

      It will be far worse if Nigel gets in power he’s following TRUMP agenda!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Moose Did you see Farage speaking at their conference today?  He was quite clear about massive cuts to benefits and how unfair it is to hard working people who have to get up to an alarm every morning and go to work, while those who choose a life on benefits are given more than hard working people earn.  There's their plan right there.  They are going to destroy the welfare system and wreck the lives of anyone on benefits, including ill and disabled people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @TitanAX9901 Reform only have one single aim - sort out illegal immigration.

      They have no plan for any other department of Government.

      Government is of course about all the different departments not just one. 

      Whilst they are getting support on their supposed plans for illegal immigration, even those wont be got over the line quickly because of the many obstacles to stop it.

      With their single mindedness on that issue I think they will be a worse party to have in power than all of the others.