With the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) currently pressing ahead with the issuing of around 83,000 migration notices per month asking income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ir-ESA)claimants to move to Universal Credit (UC), we’re taking a look at how the process is going. 

On the whole, the majority of people who received a migration notice to move from ir-ESA to UC seem to be finding their claim is going through smoothly.  If you’ve used our Managed Migration guide, you may have come up against some of the pitfalls we highlighted, but we’ve had reports from members that they’ve been able to use the information within it to challenge errors by the DWP. 

There are some issues that seem to be coming up for quite a few claimants, so we want to highlight the most common of these:

Work-related activity or support component not transferring to UC

 The component that you currently have within your ESA claim should transfer automatically to UC without any need to submit fit notes or go through a work capability assessment.  If you have the work-related activity component, this automatically becomes the Limited Capability for Work (LCW) element of UC, and the support component becomes the Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) element.

Whilst the DWP seem to have ironed out earlier issues where people migrating from ir-ESA were being asked to supply fit notes, many claimants have reported the LCW or LCWRA element being missing from their first UC payment. 

The underlying problem is a special form called an MGP1 that is completed by the DWP to confirm the claimant has an existing award of the work-related activity or support component that needs to be transferred to UC.  This form has to be verified by the DWP’s Move to UC team but delays in this happening, almost certainly due to the huge numbers of claims now being processed, mean that some claimants are finding the LCW or LCWRA element isn’t included in their first payment when it should be.

If this happens to you, request a mandatory reconsideration of the decision using your journal (or via the UC helpline if you have a telephone claim).  You can also make an online complaint to Universal Credit here: https://makeacomplaint.dwp.gov.uk/

Mysteriously appearing ‘New-Style’ ESA

 In the old system, there were two types of ESA: contribution-based (based on your personal national insurance contributions) and income-related (which contained premiums for special situations and was paid as a couple if you have a partner).  Only the income-related type of ESA is moving to UC.

Some people had ‘mixed’ ESA awards where they received contribution-based ESA with a ‘top-up’ of income-related ESA.  Not all claimants were aware that their award was partly made up of contribution-based ESA, so this has come as a surprise when they have moved to UC.  Contribution-based ESA automatically morphs into ‘New-Style’ ESA, which is deducted £ for £ from your UC award. 

If you are one of the people whose ESA was made up in this way, you might get payments of New-Style ESA that you weren’t expecting during the migration process and then a lower amount of UC that you thought you would (although your overall amount of benefit should be the same).

If you are unsure whether your first month’s payment of UC is correct, you can contact Citizen Advice’s Help to Claim Service (or your local advice centre) for help.

ir-ESA continues for longer than it should

When you make your claim for UC, your ESA should continue for two weeks and then stop.  This money should not affect your UC.  But some claimants have been reporting that they have received their ir-ESA for longer than these two weeks.  If this happens, the extra ir-ESA does count as income for your UC and can be deducted from your first payment.  You might spot this because it will appear as a deduction in the breakdown of your UC payment. But it can’t also be claimed back from you by ESA.  

If UC aren’t aware you have continued to receive extra ir-ESA during your first month on UC, they may not deduct it.  When they correct this later, you will have been overpaid UC in your first assessment period and that will unfortunately be recoverable from your future payments.  You can, however, negotiate the rate of repayment by contacting DWP Debt Management. 

Don’t despair!

Although we have highlighted three key problems that are arising, these are only happening for some claimants and the vast majority of people seem to be having few issues with their move.  For a more detailed guide to the migration process, do have a look at the ESA to UC Managed Migration Guide in our members’ area

And if your experience has been different, please do share in the comments section below.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Mine went smoothly. Informed the housing department that I was migrating, same with council tax. Took 2 months grace before applying online. Very quick to fill in the form. Got a call a few days later for my identity check and passed that, so no in person check at the Job-Centre. Got my two week roll-on ESA and rent. First payment went into bank account this month. Very surprised to have no complaints about the process. I know someone who wasn't so lucky and was over-paid. This was due to them being told that the DWP would contact the council about suspending rent etc, and then didn't. They received payments during the 5 week wait. Still not told what the payments were covering.  So they are having to pay the over payment back over 6 months
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Will Labour Really Push These Cuts Through? Don’t Be So Sure They Still Won’t Try.

    There’s been a lot of talk lately—some of it hopeful—that Labour’s plans to slash disability support might still be derailed. That decency, internal rebellion, or the Lords might intervene. But let’s be honest. We need to look this in the eye and understand the true likelihood of what’s coming.

    Labour can push these reforms through—and they probably will.

    Why? Because they’ve already calculated that they can. And they’re setting the stage to do it through a Money Bill—a rarely used parliamentary route that neuters scrutiny from the House of Lords and forces legislation through in just 30 days. If the Speaker of the House certifies it as such, there’s virtually nothing that can be done procedurally to stop it. No matter how flawed, unjust or destructive the bill is.

    But here’s the rub: these reforms don’t just involve financial adjustments. They contain structural changes—like a new PIP assessment and tightened reassessment rules—that arguably don’t qualify under the strict definition of a Money Bill. If the Speaker has integrity, they may reject the certification. But how often do we see real integrity in positions of power anymore?

    If Labour writes the bill carefully—stripping out the more contentious non-financial clauses and front-loading the fiscal elements—they could just about get it certified. And that would be that. Debate stifled. Resistance neutered. Cuts locked in.

    All of this depends on one question: does Labour want to push this through with speed and silence, or will they risk the backlash and allow full debate?

    From what we’ve seen—Liz Kendall’s empty “concessions,” Starmer’s cold-eyed detachment, Rachel Reeves' smug cruelty disguised as stability—the signs are grim. These are not people of vision or principle. These are political climbers, obsessed with fiscal signalling and desperate to prove to the City that they can “govern like grown-ups” (read: punish the poor without flinching).

    If they do this, it will be one of the most shameful betrayals in modern British politics—Labour dismantling support for the very people they once claimed to fight for. Not reform. Not modernisation. Just abandonment in a tailored suit.

    So yes, the likelihood is high. I’d put it at 70%–90%.
    It all depends on whether the Speaker plays along and whether Labour MPs grow a spine or stay in line.

    What’s left for us? Keep shouting. Keep writing. Keep reminding them: if they do this, it won’t be quietly forgotten. These reforms may pass in silence—but the consequences will be loud and long-lasting.

    As for Starmer’s Labour, the stench of betrayal will cling long after the ink dries.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Disy To avoid frightening people you really need to back up your hypothesis about the likelihood of this becoming a 'money bill'. I've read concerned sources elsewhere that say that route is technically impossible for this Green Paper policy. Do you know for sure that it's not? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    I have been on uc since 01st of march and on my 4th statement now everything went ok and got my first payment after 5 weeks although did have a problem with the housing element overall it is a stricter crueler heartless system than esa getting paid monthly I still struggle with it and  being in the lcw work activity group doesnt help with monthly interviews with a work coach but awaiting wca to hopefully get into lcwra next time around 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    From DPAC on Bluesky:

    BBC NW reporter Kevin Fitzpatrick would like to contact disabled people who would be up for speaking to him about the imminent cuts to PIP how they could be affected and why they need their PIP

    Kevin Fitzpatrick
    , BBC Radio Mancs & Politics North West
    Tel: 07801 741 070
    @kevfitz21
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    I have to migrate over by the end of july hoping I went have any of the problems above fingers crossed!. With it going smoothly for the majority at least that is a little bit of good news with what's going on at the moment with the cuts
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I think this over flatters the dwp from my experience, which has included all the above problems, but the data matching  of my rent allowed by the council on legacy benefits,  provided by the council has caused another problem. The council provided a rent figure to UC, that was out of date, and not the day before the migration that it should have been. This meant the transitional protection was lower than it otherwise should have been. I’ve offered every bit of evidence known to man or beast, but they will only accept what they have from the council. Also they refuse to accept a mandatory reconsideration on the matter. It’s literally like torture! The council agree with me, but say they don’t have a communication channel to speak to UC. I’ve sent a paper based reconsideration in, as it’s all I can think of. Speak as I find, not that easy, and I thought I was well prepared having read up on it!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @R I think we are seeing first hand why periodically we see " The DWP has underpaid X number of people Y benefit" and in this case somewhere down the line a LOT of people are owed transitional protection. They stuffed mine up but luckily my carer has worked far higher up the civil service than any useless bugger in the DWP can imagine. I only wish I hadn't had to watch so many people in the 2013 era succumb to despair and Sui - including a relative. calculated, incompetent and callous are a very bad combination 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.