Benefits and Work has obtained details of the conditions which have the highest number of awards with no 4-point or higher descriptors. 

The figures, provided under the Freedom of Information Act, show that Labour's PIP cuts are overwhelmingly aimed at older, but still working age, claimants with physical health conditions, many of whom will have been employed for most of their adult life and many of whom will still be employed.. 

Almost half (46%) of all working age PIP claimants are at risk of losing their award on review from November 2026  

Nearly eight out of ten awards where back pain is the primary disabling condition are at risk under the proposed 4-point or higher rule

This is closely followed by arthritis, where more than three quarters of awards are threatened.

The conditions least likely to lose out are learning disabilities, where only 3% are at risk and autistic spectrum disorders at 6%

These figures only cover working age claimants.  There is a lack of clarity from the DWP about what will happen to pension age claimants from November 2026.

According to these statistics there are a total of 2,795,000 working age PIP claimants and 1,296,000 (46%) are at risk of losing their award on review from November 2026.

 

Rank

Health condition category

Volume of PIP Claimants in receipt of Daily Living component

Claimants awarded less than 4 points in all daily living activities

Volume in each condition group

Proportion in each condition group

1

Back pain

194,000

154,000

79%

2

Arthritis

279,000

214,000

77%

3

Other Regional Musculoskeletal Diseases

136,000

97,000

71%

4

Chronic pain syndromes

173,000

118,000

68%

5

Cardiovascular diseases

61,000

38,000

62%

6

Respiratory diseases

83,000

45,000

55%

7

Anxiety and depression

587,000

282,000

48%

8

Multiple sclerosis and neuropathic diseases

80,000

38,000

48%

9

All other conditions

272,000

126,000

46%

10

Other neurological diseases

97,000

35,000

36%

11

Cerebrovascular disease

56,000

19,000

34%

12

Cancer

70,000

23,000

33%

13

Epilepsy

36,000

11,000

30%

14

Other psychiatric disorders

90,000

25,000

28%

15

Cerebral Palsy and Neurological Muscular Diseases

47,00

11,000

24%

16

Psychotic disorders

112,000

26,000

23%

17

ADHD/ADD

75,000

14,000

19%

18

Autistic spectrum disorders

206,000

13,000

6%

19

Learning disabilities

188,000

7,000

3%

DWP Notes

Health condition category is based on primary health condition as recorded on the PIP Computer System at time of latest assessment. Many claimants have multiple health conditions but only primary condition is available for analysis.

Only the 18 disabling condition groups which make up the highest proportions of the PIP caseload are displayed in this table.

Other disabling condition groups which cover smaller proportions of the PIP caseload are covered in the "Other Conditions" category. This includes:

  • Visual Diseases
  • Other General Musculoskeletal Diseases
  • Endocrine Diseases
  • Hearing Disorders
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases
  • Genitourinary Diseases
  • Skin Diseases
  • Autoimmune Diseases (Connective Tissue Disorders)
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Diseases of the Liver, Gallbladder or Biliary Tract
  • Haematological Diseases
  • Metabolic Diseases
  • Multisystem and Extremes of Age
  • Diseases of the Immune System

Anxiety and Depression includes the following conditions recorded in the PIP Stat Xplore data:

  • Anxiety disorders - Other / type not known
  • Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
  • Stress reaction disorders - Other / type not known
  • Generalised anxiety disorder
  • Phobia - Specific
  • Phobia - Social
  • Agoraphobia
  • Panic disorder
  • Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)
  • Anxiety and depressive disorders - mixed
  • Conversion disorder (hysteria)
  • Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)
  • Dissociative disorders - Other / type not known
  • Somatoform disorders - Other / type not known
  • Depressive disorder
  • Bipolar affective disorder (Hypomania / Mania)
  • Mood disorders - Other / type not known

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @sara It is a powerful one and this has to be raised with the MPs and Lords so there are attempts to alter this within the bill itself by alerting them to the dangers
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @James @James that's a powerful one. Would alerting our couny council housing departmentss be the way to best publicise that?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    And now this:


    Please nobody answer the survey if you receive it.  Or better yet, write on it:

    'NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS, I OPPOSE THE DISGUSTING WELFARE CUTS AND REFORM'

    Send that back to them!

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Mick I’ve been thinking about the effects of PIP cuts and the impact on HB for a couple of days now so it’s good to see it explained so well in this article. Many, many people must be extremely worried as must many Councils who face losing tenants plus private landlords, as they will both lose income and face the costs of bringing evictions. Once this aspect starts appearing in the wider Press and in the minds of MPs who will lose their seats over it, there will be a bigger backlash to the PIP cuts. As an OAP homeowner with a mortgage and service charges, I receive ZERO help - any help with service charges through ESA was lost when I got my pension. I’m enhanced DL&MOB but my highest in DL is a 3 point, 10yr review is 2033. My point is that people need certainty about their futures not endless worry about how they’re going to keep a roof over their heads. The wider economy is also a bust flush as it will be impacted by reduced spending as people cut back. Welcome to austerity 2.0, not!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Mick i AGREE WITH YOU MICK

      I think we have ALL got to be a little cautious in where we add our names in light of recent revelations.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Mick Oh no, I answered the Scope one thinking it would help )-:
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Mick I'd ask them what they spend their expenses on. "That's none of your business!" they'll also no doubt say. Because it's different when the shoe is on the other foot, isn't it?

      Also, thanks for the free £10 voucher. lol
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago


    Seems some  libdems support cuts this is just some of the news report from yahoo news.


    THE Liberal Democrats have criticised the Labour group for not supporting their motion at the full council meeting in Warrington on Monday.

    The motion was on the Government’s recent Green Paper, proposing welfare payment changes amounting to £5 billion a year.

    At the full council meeting, the Labour group unanimously voted against the motion which called on the council leader to write to the Chancellor and the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to express the council’s ‘grave concerns’ about the impact of these changes and to urge for a ‘reverse’ of the ‘decision to target those with disabilities and health condition with cuts to their support payments’.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Lill I’m confused, it looks from what you’ve said here like the Lib Dems we’re challenging the govt’s proposals, not supporting them? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Lill Sorry, the quote I included didn't send properly but here you go:

      "Liberal Democrat Cllr Ian Marks, a former council leader, seconded the motion.

      He said: “We welcome attempts to get people back into work and recognise that the welfare system is a mess and needs sorting out.

      “However, we don’t like the way the Government has gone about these changes and they have handled the politics badly.

      “Coming on top of the winter fuel allowance cuts, Labour voters believe the Government has lost touch with ordinary people and the changes they promised at the election have not happened. A recent study predicts that the benefit cuts could cost Labour eighty seats at a General Election.

      “We agree that the public finances in the country are in a dire state but money should be raised by making the big banks, the technology and social media companies and on-line gaming firms pay a fair share from their huge profits, rather than penalising the disabled and those with health issues.”"
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Lill Sorry but I've read the full article and I can't seem to find where it indicates that "some Lib Dems support the cuts"? 

      It sounds to me like the Lib Dem councillors are upset that the Labour councillors in the Warrington council don't wish to raise any concerns with the higher ups in the government and have blocked a motion that Lib Dems proposed for them to do so, even though the Labour councillors are also reportedly as worried as they are.

      The article concludes with this.

      "

      He said: “We welcome attempts to get people back into work and recognise that the welfare system is a mess and needs sorting out.

      “However, we don’t like the way the Government has gone about these changes and they have handled the politics badly.

      “Coming on top of the winter fuel allowance cuts, Labour voters believe the Government has lost touch with ordinary people and the changes they promised at the election have not happened. A recent study predicts that the benefit cuts could cost Labour eighty seats at a General Election.

       
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    @James, re your investigation into the £6,000 limit:

    It only makes sense in the warped dwp parallel universe. It's the same when they calculate how much you'd get from a pension you haven't accessed - they put a notional figure on the non-existent annuity payments and deduct it from means tested benefits. Also, the £6,000 threshold is soooo longstanding it's nonsense. Trying to save for a car, for example, because the motability scheme doesn't suit everyone, you can't accumulate enough without losing some of what you've saved. They deduct according to their inflated figure and the real, much lower, figure is eroded by the deduction . Simples 🙄
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @sara The same applies to medical procedures. Someone cannot get an operation on the NHS because of ridiculously long waiting lists and times, but isn't allowed to save the money to pay for private treatment and aftercare.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago


    "nothing that’s been sent to me has given me hard evidence of cases that are at risk of really losing out.”

    Wish we knew which that mp was - we could put them right! Refer them to a certain B&W survey maybe.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @tintack tintack Yep, head up his own backside.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @SLB
      "thankfully, he might be educated during the Commons debate"

      Assuming whoever it is bothers to turn up. It sounds like someone who is determined not to see the evidence staring them in the face. "I see no ships...."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Frances Whoever it is will certainly be one of the right-wing Starmerite drones. I find it very hard to believe that they haven't had e-mails from constituents describing just how devastating the cuts will be if they go through. And given that the stated intention is to save billions of pounds - not that that will actually happen, as the savings made by cutting benefits will be vastly outweighed by the extra cost of NHS treatments that people will need because they've been made poorer and therefore sicker - how do they think that is going to happen without people losing out? Presumably they think the savings will be made by pushing sick and disabled people into all those jobs that don't exist and which they couldn't do even if they did exist.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Frances thankfully, he might be educated during the Commons debate.  But it's pretty sickening that there are MPs who can't be bothered to do their homework.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Frances "Nothing that’s been sent to me has given me hard evidence of cases that are at risk of really losing out.”

      Oh, that's extremely reassuring! They personally haven't seen or heard anybody worrying about these reforms so that means nothing bad is going to happen. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    From the Guardian:  "Ministers scramble to avoid Labour rebellion on disability benefit cuts
    Exclusive: backbenchers may be allowed to abstain, a major climbdown from previous votes when rebels were suspended from the party."

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Another news story, this time in the Mirror:
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    So you've got better than a 50/50 chance if you're just down and bluesy?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Keir Starmer and his clowns are scrambling to bribe revolting MPs against disability benefits cuts, offering them to abstain!

    "One Labour MP said: “When people abstained on the winter fuel vote, they were warned that it had been taken by the leadership as voting against the government. This time, however, a number of MPs have been offered the opportunity to abstain.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/apr/17/ministers-avoid-labour-rebellion-disability-cuts
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Scorpion And many will, because they're wimps.  But I'm not sure that's enough to make the whole thing blow over.  Our best chance is to see Labour decimated at the council elections.  I've voted against Labour for the first time in my 33 years of voting.  I'm sure I'm not alone - and, thankfully, there are plenty of people upset with Labour for other reasons, too.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Follow up to my previous posting I have made an FOI request to the DWP through What do they know web site

    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/how_does_435_return_per_month_ha

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @SLB I've sent two responses to Scope, one from me and one from my husband. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @SLB Brilliant, every mention in the news of the real impact is good, thanks for flagging these.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Slightly off topic but related to the so called 6,000 pound limit. 

    The DWP say that if someone has a savings of say 6,250 pounds then for the extra 250 pounds they say will regard it as an earning by you at 4.35 a month. I started to wondering this is in fact a return of 20.88 percent a year. If this is the case will it be possible to find out how someone can do this with their money and where such a good investment can be found because it does not make sense to me.

    I wondered if we able to investigate and find out how this can be done by an individual who is on benefits and may have 250 pounds which they will consider will earn 4.35 which is 52.5 pounds per year which I think you will agree is a very good return for anyone by any standards.

    Is there some way we could challenge this assertion ? because if they know of something the rest of us do not I would like to find out more !~

    As a person on benefit if I had such an amount to invest ie 250 pounds where can I find out where I can get a return of 4.25 while being on benefits because I simply do not know or understand how this can actually be achieved 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @James It's up to £6250 e.g,  if you have a pound more than £6000; then you will lose £4.35, as you are classed as having £6250. if you have a pound more than £6500; then you will lose £8.70 and so on.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Please do not vote for Reform. These people will be even worse than Labour on benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Jamie "Reform NEVER stated disabled people were parasites. It was a journalist who was quoted as saying that."

      Said journalist is the wife of Reform party's deputy, as Dez pointed out (interesting how you chose to overlook that). There's that old bit about how those you choose to associate with reflect upon you and your views. You can disagree, but I also think it very much applies to your partner as well.

      Personally, I don't want anyone who chooses to cohabitate with somebody who refers to disabled people as 'parasites' to be my deputy PM but you do you, son.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @James I wouldn't mind but this has all been common knowledge for nearly a year now. Whatever isn't incredibly alarming (i.e. that people have four months to find a job or their benefits get cut) is just downright vague. They say they want to do something but then they don't explain how exactly or where the money is going to come from. 

      I'd also like to see some proof of Reform being more progressive than what's in this article from Jamie because cutting people off benefits after just four months - even if they are fit for work - is just morally inexcusable. You're not automatically gaming the system just because you haven't found a job in four months. My cousin works at a Jobcentre, and they say a lot of people wait for several months just to get an interview. It's often not the fault of jobseekers, that's just how the job market is at the moment.

      Also, finding a part-time job or a job where the hours are suited for your disabilities probably won't fly with them either because Richard Tice pretty much said in that interview that Dez linked (because it helps to actually listen to these things before commenting on them, Jamie) that such a thing is a 'structural problem in the benefits system'. He says that it apparently "pays more" to only work 16 hours a week and claim benefits while ignoring the reasons why one would only work part time and claim benefits. Such as disabilities preventing them from working full time.

      A lot of this just reads like the Reform party are riding on the perception that living on benefits is incredibly lucrative and preferable to having a full-time job when we know this to be completely untrue. We shouldn't be voting for people who want to rewrite reality and paint us as "living it large" on benefits just so they can scapegoat us for the country's financial issues and fleece us just like Labour is doing right now. Like somebody else has said: it's like voting for the wolf because the dog bit you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jamie And before you say "well, he still said we should have a welfare system that helps those who genuinely need it". I don't care. The Tories and Labour have come out with this tosh as well and that's never how these things work out. Tice also immediately follows that up with saying that a "a meaningful element is swinging the lead". By using a word like meaningful, he is indicating a significant portion of us are potential fraudsters and are making a conscious "lifestyle choice" (his exact words) to stay on benefits. 

      And when asked what he means by 'genuinely disabled'? He gives a wishy washy answer that he claims to empathise with mental illness but then follows it up with the classic "work is good for you!" that the Tories and Labour have also been spouted. And when called out for his offensiveness by one caller? "I'm sorry you feel that way." which the non-apologies of non-apologies. 

      If you cannot give a direct answer as to how you will look like after the genuinely disabled who cannot work without indicating that you will view everyone as a fraudster by default, you're just tarring us with the same brush and disabled people shouldn't vote for you. Bottom line.

      He even brings up the same old hogwash about working from home when we also know that employers have been scaling back working from home for years. I have a friend who lost his WFH position because his manager got transferred out and a new manager didn't want to accommodate him and demanded he get in the office, despite him being in a wheelchair and unable to travel. 

      Richard Tice is a liar just like Liz Kendall is (and Wes Streeting, since he's yet another person who isn't a medical professional saying that things like autism and ADHD are "overdiagnosed" - when autism actually requires an in-depth assessment to be diagnosed and is incredibly different to diagnose in adults, particularly women) and the fact that you're overlooking his lies and calling me the liar for simply quoting him is what's actually hypocritical here. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jamie I literally linked to a quote from their deputy saying we're slacking off and that mental illness is the "new bad back" and that journalist isn't just any journalist. That journalist is his wife/live-in partner. You can be disingenuous and pretend that's not an issue all you want but I'd say that's a pretty major detail. 

      If you were an actual disability advocate, you wouldn't be literally in bed with somebody who refers to the disabled as parasites. You can argue otherwise until you're blue in the face, it doesn't make any sense.

      I provided sources for my information. I don't see any proof refuting what I've posted about Tice other than you going 'that's not true!' like I'm supposed to take the words of a random internet user at face value.

      "This is the thing, because of your political leanings and ideology, you can't see the wood for the trees and give out false information to garner support. That is as dangerous as any political party doing the same - it's hypocritical."

      Oh, do behave. I have every right to call out ableist politicians as a disabled person and advise other disabled people to think twice before supporting them. I'm sorry if that hurts your precious feel feels but that's not the same thing as giving out misinformation. 

      You can disagree that this is a problem. Which is all fine and dandy but don't you dare accuse me of being a liar just because you can't be bothered to click a link and verify things for yourself.

      Because again: I posted proof. It's not "false information" if there's literally proof of Reform party members labelling us as slackers/fakers and doubling down when people call them out live on air. Or are you going to suggest it's just a double body of Richard Tice saying these things and the actual Richard Tice is a kind and generous man who cuddles puppies and kisses the heads of poor infants in his spare time? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Always thought after green paper this government wanted to get gone the standard rates of pip also in 2030 wouldn’t surprise me if they abolished the pip benefit altogether and keep the disabled needs to outsource it to local councils to care for disabled . Hopefully these proposals will get challenged and watered down but all can all do is hope and dwp have a duty to care and treat disabled people with dignity and respect their complex conditions otherwise I think there will be a lot of deaths on their hands and a lot of human rights law being broken (disabled act 2010) lets all stick together with the help of this site and other charitie sites just maybe there will be a fair end to all this stress and anxiety which all inflames our mental and physical disability’s 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @diceman24 Let’s just hope everyone has the strength to Appeal, the Gov will pay a power of £££’s if we do. I am preparing, even this early. I am 69 so no idea what will happen to me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @lesley Sorry. Try again.. Didn’t the government try something similar with Disability Living Allowance? Instead of giving cash payments they suggested replacing it with other types of provision. Never going to work.
      Local councils  are all overworked and not enough staff.
      N.H.S. underfunded and overwhelmed.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @diceman24 Didn’t the government try something similar with Disability Living Allowance? Instead of giving cash they suggested replacing regular cash payments with other types of provision. Never

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    I’m getting more and more angry about the government doing this, I have been writing to the relevant people. I’m just feeling so so mad what is happening in this country.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Terrified chronic argophbia and now they going say got for work and cannot leave house I wake up shaking 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Na I hear you, cronic agoraphobic with panic disorder and ptsd,I'm in a mess right now over this,my mh is completely shot,panic attacks at home now and In the night aswell,it's destroyed me,it won't change my ability to work,infact I was closer to work b4 these announcements as I had slowly started to move away from my front door,not now!! these people don't understand and don't want to understand mental health 🙄 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Na If you are anything like me, you wouldn't even make it to the job centre, let alone a job interview.
      I struggle with even online things, especially if more than 1 to 1 and that's hard enough.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    I hear via varies newspaper reports, that the consultations for pip are an absolute joke. They aren't even discussing the pip cuts at them. Surely, this can be picked up legally as the consultations aren't being carried out properly?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Anon I did see something on a Youtube channel a few days ago which said that there are a number of solicitors who are looking at ways to mount a legal challenge. Whether that's because the most damaging changes are not included in the consultation I don't know, but it would be surprising to say the least if that were not part of it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Pj That’s exactly what I’ve been thinking, though I haven’t seen anything mentioned yet about a legal challenge. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    To get rid of daily daily living as those left will be on enhanced, what's next? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Anon* People on enhanced DL will lose even more than low rate DL - the 4-point rule applies just the same. I have enhanced DL but my highest score is 3 points. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Scorpion Abolition of the sick and disabled. Don't put anything past this government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Anon* "what's next?"

      Abolition of sickness and disability benefits, I guess!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Despite only 250,000 being asked if they can work and not to the wider public and how many individuals were in the report saying they were not able to work. While its already been reported that 250,000 will be thrown into poverty, then what happens with the other 6/700,000?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Including people that already work and may lose their job because the need PIP! Why weren't they able to cut the health element and leave PIP alone! PIP is already a nightmare to claim and it's ongoing with assessments.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon I'm also set to lose everything cbesa pip and carers 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout I'd prefer to have £200 from Esa cut than be thrown into poverty and lose everything! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Anon Absolutely thoughtless. You seriously think it's OK for a great many people who cannot work at all to lose the £423.27 a month health element of UC? It will please you to know it is being cut - to £0.00. No PIP, no LCWRA.

      The health element is already a nightmare to claim and it's ongoing with assessments.

      You ought to justify your bullshit. 

      Statements like yours make me hit the roof.


Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact