The DWP is continuing to use any time-wasting option available to avoid publishing details of the responses to the Modernising Support Green Paper., The document proposed radical changes to PIP, including the use of vouchers and changes to the eligibility criteria.

As we pointed out last month, when Labour won the election on 4 July, contrary to many people’s expectations, they left the Conservative government’s green paper survey open for responses until it’s official closing date on 22 July.

The Labour government went on to “review the responses” according to Stephen Timms, DWP minister for disability, but chose not to publish a response of their own.

So Benefits and Work made a Freedom of Information request for “any documents relating to an analysis, breakdown or other summary of the responses received to this consultation”.

But our request was refused on the grounds of “a lack of clarity”.

We requested that the DWP review the decision, because our request was perfectly clear. This is the first stage in the process of challenging a refusal, before appealing to the Information Commissioner’s Office and then to a tribunal.

On 9 December, we received a response from the DWP stating:

“Thank you for your Internal Review request which was received on 8th November. Your request is being considered under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

“Whilst we endeavour to respond to Internal Reviews within twenty days, on this occasion we need more time to consider your request. Following the Information Commissioner's Office guidance we are extending this deadline by a further twenty days.”

It is very hard to see why it would take 40 working days just to decide whether our request lacked clarity – most people could probably make their mind up over a cup of coffee.

But it does allow the DWP to drag this process out for as long as possible.

And it does increase the suspicion that the DWP have a reason for not wanting people to know just how badly all of the Conservative government’s proposals for PIP were received.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    If you watch Liz Kendall at that committee appearance last month you will notice that she's perfectly composed and relaxed while taking and answering the first few questions put to her. However, as soon as she's asked about changes to sickness and disability benefits her whole demeanour changes. She puts on her glasses and takes them off again numerous times, affects a confidential and grave manner, strains to appear sympathetic while looking about her and lowering her eyes, etc. She says nothing concrete about Labour's own plans for our benefits, and it's becoming clearer and clearer why she was stalling (while pretending to care). 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    Maybe dwp waiting for high court result on Thursday 12th December this year maybe? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    "And it does increase the suspicion that the DWP have a reason for not wanting people to know just how badly all of the Conservative government’s proposals for PIP were received."

    And that can only be because their's are likely to be just as bad or not far off the Tory proposals. Otherwise they would publish them to mock the Tories and say we are listening to the people and are not going to follow your proposals that they have rejected. But the fact they haven't done that is very suspicious indeed. What have they got up their sleeve for us.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    I was reading comments on other newsbytes here and a comment was that "mental illness isn't really a disability". I know people have their own problems, their own crosses to bare and it makes a person insular but a little tact towards others goes along way. 

    Graham Thorpe was a Man who had everything, he had a loving family, a lot of money to retire on, a great career in professional cricket but he took his own life due to manic depression, he left a family who will forever be scarred by his actions. The downplaying and trivializing of mental illness doesn't just put the individual in harms way but the wider public too, try getting a paranoid schizophrenic to work as a chef or stack shelves in Tescos, what if said person has a psychotic breakdown? 

    What about victims of sexual abuse who have severe emotional trauma? or people with PTSD who have served in the army who have had to do the unthinkable on the battle field? Is it just a joke? a put on for the benefits? When you lose your mind what use is the body? What do you think Asylums were for? You know people still get sectioned? What is the Mental Health Act?

    I'm sick and tired of this incessant trivializing and mocking of mental illness, it's only in Britain too, nowhere else in Europe does this nonsense happen. What is wrong with this country? You want money Britain? Then there are MANY WAYS to make money, picking on the vulnerable and poor isn't one of them.

    The reality is that depression and anxiety get worse when you do nothing, both need to be nipped in the bud or it manifests into something more severe, more disabling. 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @Dave Dee Unfortunately there have even been comments from readers of this very website claiming mental illnesses are not disabilities.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    We will be reviewing all disability benefits but we will be doing it in our own extra special Labour way which will bear no relation to the unpleasant Tory way at all. Not even close to that way. No Siree. This will be a nice Labour pleasant Steven Timms sort of way. Much nicer than, for instance, Ian Duncan Smith.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    16000 of us gave  the proposals a firm kick into the long grass, where they belong. The lack of willingness to publish the findings only serves to confirm this. None of us are fooled by the lack of transparency , nor are we fooled by the so called “new compassionate face” of the dwp.  Same old dwp.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.