Today, as government borrowing costs remain punishingly high, panicked Chancellor Rachel Reeves will try to reassure the markets that the government is growing the economy and cutting the benefits bill.

We'll update this page with any information about benefits changes as soon as we get it.

Reeves is speaking now, she says:

"We will deliver fundamental reform of our welfare system.  That includes looking at areas that have been ducked for too long, like the rising cost of health and disability benefits. And the secretary of state for work and pensions will set out our plans to address this ahead of the Spring statement."

Will there be more?

No, it seems there won't. 

However, there are motions by both Rachel Reeves and Liz Kendall on the welfare cap this afternoon.  Reeves  told the Sun on Sunday that she will “expose how the Conservatives lost complete control of the benefits bill – with a project overspend of more than £8 billion”.

So, there may be more on benefits to come.  We'll keep this page open for the rest of the day, just in case.

Alison McGovern minister for unemployment is standing in for Rachel Reeves and Liz Kendall. 

She says she is never disappointed in her work coaches, the thing that lets them down is the system they work within.

It's on Parliament TV from 16.14 at this link:

https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/e4026aea-0691-4880-8957-3db8c8d0825f

 McGovern explains that the Conservatives have breached the welfare spending cap by £8 billion.

She appears to be claiming that the move from ESA to UC is the cause of much of the rise in benefits spending, because of the hard separation between the level of benefit for those capable of work and those with LCWRA.

She also says that you cannot have a functioning social security system if the health service is not functioning.  For example being told you can only see someone for 10 minutes, having to do numerous admin checks that could be done with modern technology.

We are hearing a great deal about getting people into work, but nothing about changes to the WCA and PIP. Instead, McGovern refers once again to the Green Paper to be published in the Spring, even though Rachel Reeves has said "we’re setting out our detailed plans before Easter".

She confirms that Labour will keep the welfare cap, which is intended to limit the amount that is spent overall on social security.

 It's notable that the house is almost empty.  Jeremy Corbyn has asked questions of the minister.

She moves onto fraud.

And that seems to be it.

There's a link to the written statements by Liz Kendall here

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 days ago
    Anyone any ideas what will.happen regarding pip if a person is working anyway
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    I got my migration date esa to uc few days ago. Is it best to claim straight away or nearer the three month period deadline? I habe no savings to see me through three weeks when its switching over so I thought I would save first  then do it nearer the time. What is best with other people's experiences? Thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @doe Wait till after the 6th of April or you will lose the increase in the amount you get.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @sara thanks Sara for your advice. Its helpful. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @sara thanks for the info. Much appreciated. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Bob There is a phone line with uc. Who I rang and they recommended I do it myself as I can control the claim more. Ie he meant see it online. He said if I did it through the phone line that I would have to keep ringing the phone line for everything in the claim as I wouldn't be able to view the application myself. The phone line is for people to claim through them if you need help. It didn't fill me with confidence.  You could try people from welfare rights or citizens advice may help. Or find the nearest unemployed resource centre or maybe a u can centre might help or mind, henshaws, scope the most appropriate charity for your conditions. They can usually put you in touch in touch or some  have in-house information and guidance people or benefit advisors. Some housing associations also have the advice workers. It's just what one person told me on the uc line I rang. I can't say all are like this. Some may be helpful. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout thanks for the advice. Much appreciated 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    Having just applied for pension credits ive been told that i dont qualify as i get £3 a month (state pension) to much so i dont get any help with my energy costs thankyou Rachael Reeves
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    About the migration process from ESA to UC. I have spoken to numerous people who have made a claim to UC from ESA get into debt borrowing money during those three weeks you don't get any money whilst your waiting to hear back from DWP. I understand you can get a loan but have to pay it back out your benefits. People have had their benefits reduced because they have had to borrow it. And now they have fell behind with their bills .  I don't understand why you don't get paid during those three weeks. People still have to eat and pay bills. They don't want to borrow money and then get into debt.  The whole system is wrong.  Is nobody raising this concern with the government. And do labour really care about these vulnerable people. The stress is a menace. When your worrying about how to pay rent, eat, other bills. I don't want to borrow money and worry about paying it back 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @BOB This is incorrect. You do get paid between the 5 week waiting period.

      Once you claim UC, you still get paid both ESA & housing for 2 weeks after that date.

      That leaves 3 week before your 1st UC payment where you are paid a FULL month.

      In reality, you are getting a week EXTRA. You DO NOT lose out.

      I never ever understand the need to take out a loan. It simply isn't necessary, if you time your claim correctly.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @BOB "And do labour really care about these vulnerable people."

      We all know the answer to that. An emphatic NO. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    Also all this aboir getting people to work. All job adverts have an interview- - if you attend a job interview and are truthful about your disability and how it doesn't compliment a job role an employer will not look at you. Higher insurance and risk of per3sonal injury claims think about it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Stand your ground It's particularly problematic if it is a visible disability, eg being blind or sight impaired. It is said that the first thirty seconds can mean the difference between of being hired or dumped.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    Why not reform UC in a similar manner to Working Tax Credits with q 16 hour element, a disability element- lets face UC has failed. I have to say it, now you realise why Corbyn should have been voted in, 
    In British politics all there now is Thatcherism in a Labour wrapper or a Torie wrapper who are in the pockets of the big corporations - sure that's were Mps end up and or the Lord's with 350 a day for singing their name. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    Every single disabled person is on the hit list . Nobody cares.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    I don't think think there will be much to worry about they'll do consultation but it won't go through If it's not lawful all this stuff they want to do will not come In this year they got to trial the plans get it all right they won't be able to trick people or it will just get dragged to high court they won't be able to hide the truth  after what the judge said their treading carefully the media is just twisting things .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Room temperature Stop with this,clearly a troll on all levels,ignore this person
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Mormon man True
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Lill i am inclined to agree with you. At the end of the day still have human rights and the changes they might propose from what we are hearing are  going to be a nightmare for them to push through considering the recent loss in the high court. Not saying nothing will happen just saying they can just push what they want through doesn't work like that
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Matt Doubtful that two-tier, free-gear, no-idea, never-here KS deems the disabled to have any human rights.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Scorpion I do remember the previous Government were contemplating changing the rules around Judicial Reviews, not least because it kept losing them! Not sure if Labour will go down the same route - it would be ironic if they did given KS's former role as a 'Uman Rights Lawyer
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    What many people do not know is that the biggest group of benefits claimants in this country are people in work, as their work doesn't pay them enough money to live on without claiming benefits. No wonder a number of people who could work to an extent are applying for sickness benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Scorpion People in work shouldn't get benefits then minimum wage excluding London is set at a reasonable level more than I used to get
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    So we are looking at legislation for next years parliament after the summer recess for a white paper to be published and then 3 readings in the upper and lower houses making any changes likely to happen in the spring of 2026 ??
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Jaco But Labour is all about power, and they're worried about the latest polling.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Matt Highly doubt Reform will ever gain power,voter apathy is all they attract nothing more.Think we all suspect what reform will do regarding benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @axab43 That's good I hope they fail miserably ( the budget that is)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Neil Cook That timetable was for all the reforms not just PIP.  They are all in the same Green/White paper
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Matt No if only that could be applied to the rest of the benefit bashing they seem to be planning and I would be SO RELIEVED
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I got my UC migration letter but considering waiting until after the budget in March because they might stop the migrations due to the rising cost
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Michael Yes Michael your right it's exceptionally easy to do soon as you migrate they leave you message on your journal to say they going to ring and accept client commitment and thats it you still have to agree to commitment even if you are in lcwra but you stay in that category and they will you are paid 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @James h No they are not true. I've recently migrated and it is exceptionally easy to do.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Anon I can 100% assure you, they won't stop the migration 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @James h I think it all depends on the attitude of the work coach you're dealing with, otherwise the migration should be a hassle free straightforward process and shouldn't be any different from the usual claims people have been making on paper made this time online.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Scorpion @scorpion I’ve left mine till last minute that’s just my choice but if you log on here on Saturday morning 1st march I will give an update of whether the horror stories are true or not 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I think they are going to draw quite a harsh line between anxiety/depression and Bipolar/Schizophrenia.  Where would this leave people with severe anxiety/depression

    In my case what I thought and kept getting told by GP's was severe anxiety/depression turned out to be Bipolar 1.  I was eventually diagnosed 23 years after symptons began.  They were treating me with antidepressants which triggered mania.

    So what happens to people in this limbo. They will probably cut back psychiatrists and make waiting lists long to save themselves money because getting the right diagnosis would be very difficult.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @gt4 Noone ever considers the impact of all this on people with panic disorder and agoraphobia,these are tough illnesses to fully recover from,I've been trying to fully recover for almost 30 years,lost 2 jobs already because I litrally couldn't get there or once there couldn't go on the courses or required trips away even when the employer fully knew my limitations when I accepted the job! Couldn't make it up,honestly I don't think they even knew what the illness was and how I would be limited in the role,then they get rid of you when you can't do all the required tasks if the job,I really don't think people understand the condition atall,you tell them you can do some of it but not all of  it,you double check you won't have to do x,y,z when the job is offered to you,then when you start it all goes pear shaped when on the first week you're told to go on an away course!! Then after a few months sometimes weeks you're out and that's that,I've even lost voluntary jobs!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion Yes, exactly!  SPecialists does not have to mean consultants.  They can mean counsellors,  medical records of someone's history of seeing mental health counsellors.  I don't know of anyone receiving PIP or even other benefits for things like depression that does not already have that evidence from specialists.  It is a requirement already
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion Unless the DWP are going to employ their own medical consultants to either agree or reject clinical diagnosed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Sevenbees "I think all of that means no one will qualify for pip without a clinical diagnosis and an input from specialist, mental or physical condition."

      There's not already anyone who has been awarded PIP without "a clinical diagnosis and an input from specialist, mental or physical condition." 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @gt4
      I'm getting that worrying impression myself. Remember all those mental health awareness campaigns that all politicians - including Starmer et al - participated in saying how the stigma around depression and anxiety should stop and it should have parity with physical illness and disability in terms of NHS priority and welfare support? But now, given the relentless messaging,  when the rubber hits the road it seems they're treating them as merely trivial conditions that only seriously affect feckless youths, wimps and shirkers, and are really nothing that a few shifts at Tescos won't miraculously heal. So funding doesn't need to rise for talking therapies etc. and benefits can be significantly cut to "help" them back to work.

      In reality of course even so called "mild" depression and anxiety - if chronic and not properly treated - can be extremely serious conditions that can devastate quality of life and lead to very dangerous situations for the sufferer.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    its scary not knowing how badly they are gonna attack us and if theres going to be anything that might affect me
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @CC Where are the comments where they are supporting the Reform?  SOmeone who is working for Scope has said exactly the opposite and the talks are challenging the reforms  or for them to be adjusted to make them more acceptable.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @bob They playing a game, Scope have already confirmed they in secret talks with the ministers, notice how Scope are not revealing the discussions, they have already been effectively brought, and are making comments supportive of the already announced reform, once enough charities are in acceptance of the changes, it will be announced, and when its announced it will be too late to push for changes as their minds will already be made up, as was the case for the WFH.  They held their ground on that, with far more public outcry than this will cause.  Ideally people need PIP reviews, and claims done as close as possible to the law change date, as the rollout of changes will likely be on review's, so that will give them longer before the carnage affects them.  LCWRA currently has a ongoing award, so its less clear what will happen there.  I expect they looking for a way to do it without any new assessments, as assessments will draw it out.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Am I risking my LCWRA by doing a small about of craft making items and selling them.  Should I just stop doing it.  It could go right against me at an assessment.  It plays on my mind.  When ever they around to assessments that is.  They class it self employment but it is a damm hobby.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout I think I might deregister as self employed and give the craft items to charity.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @AB I wish they would look at this in the review. It’s such a positive thing and could lead to beneficial outcomes. 

      I wish the DWP/gov would stop using this an opportunity to remove support from people.  

      Realistically a few hours spent on a hobby is not the same as employment.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @AB It is a tricky one.  It is declared to them as self employment.  It is a small shop on Ebay.  I am LCWRA (substantial risk).    There are times I do regularly do it and times when I shut the shop down (and send UC zero figures).   However as far as their computer system is concerned I have been working about 15 months (UC). It makes a tiny profit after costs

      I don't know whether when I shut the shop and earn nothing I should deregister and then reregister (which would make me look Bipolar as F) which is the case.

      I do also qualify on continence for LCWRA but imagine explaining that.

      What do you think ?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @CB Say as little as possible to as few people as possible. A general rule for all areas of life.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @CB If all you are doing is a hobby which makes no profit and just occupies a bit of your recreational time then probably the best thing to do is not say anything about it.  If however your hobby involves the use of faculties relevant to your disability status with benefits and that you could be shown from engaging in your hobby that you could do those activities repeatedly and reliably (such  that would be required in a work environment) then probably you need to tread carefully.  In that case I would say the better thing is not to sell your hobby creations if that involves advertising on social media etc.  in practice it might have no difference even if you declare it to them but the choice is always a balancing act.   I can remember a local volunteer bureau told me that they found a lot of people wouldn't engage in voluntary work with them because they were frightened it would impact on their benefits despite the freedom within the rules to do voluntary work
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    To add to me long message to should say I can’t work 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Sorry about the long message. It took my long time to think of what to right Ok so I have epilepsy&autism&multiple learning difficulties&cerebral palsy in the right side of my body meaning my lower back is in nonstop pain&my right hand also shakes a lot. I have headache that can last 2/3 days due to my epilepsy. I still have 
    Multiple absences each week where due to my epilepsy when I sit down I will black out for a few minutes. I  work. I can’t drive but Am still super stressed&worried. I try not to read the newspapers. As what they keep saying about disabled people / people like me upsets me. But thx for everyone who posted positive comments on this page. It helps me out a little 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Dave Dee True.And Labour can't go against a patients gp if said gp considers his/her patient mental unwell and mentally unfit to work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Tomf You will be fine. They cannot force people who legitimately can't work into work, that's the crux of it.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    "The Great Benefit Bash-Off"

    Welcome to the Bash-Off stage,
    Where parties spit their scripted rage.
    The goal? To win with hollow cheers—
    By stoking doubts, exploiting fears.

    "Lazy layabouts!" the first one cries,
    "Living in mansions, built on lies!
    Hot tubs bubbling, cash to burn—
    While you work hard for what they earn."

    "Not harsh enough!" the next declares,
    "Let’s strip it back—no one cares!
    If they can smile, they must be fine—
    Cut their support, redraw the line."

    Then one steps up with vicious glee:
    "Here’s the plan to make them flee—
    Make them hop, and skip, and run,
    Juggle fire just for fun.

    If they blink without a note,
    Pull the plug. Sink the boat."

    And so it goes—round after round,
    Cruelty dressed in budget-bound.
    Truth left gasping, facts ignored,
    While lives are shattered, hope outpoured.

    But here’s the part they always miss:
    We don’t disappear through schemes like this.
    Behind each cut, each thoughtless slight,
    We gather strength, we burn bright.

    Not burdens. Not frauds. Not weak, not wrong—
    But voices rising, fierce and strong.
    For every lie they serve with flair,
    We stand. We speak. We’re still here.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Is it straight forward when you move from ESA in support group to UC my local MP told me it should be and I don't need to provide sick notes.  I've heard of many horror stories about it I have had sleepless nights worrying about it.  There's a lot of scaremongering and some newspapers don't help. It's bad enough being ill and have mental health issues so any negative stories do scare you.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @BOB I suffer from depression and anxiety as well as Carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger thumb and recently had surgery on my left thumb where a complete joint made of metal and plastic was put in. But my thumb is not flexible like it was before. So hopefully i won’t pushed into work. If i do search for work in the future who would want to employ me with these health conditions. They would just think people like me wouldn’t be unreliable off sick a lot. That’s one thing the Labour government don’t understand. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @T Thanks for that glad some people have good experience 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @BOB They chsmged it so the system now tells you that you don't need a fit note, if migrating.

      You will never be asked for a fit note. I know as ive just migrated.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @BOB Mine was very straight forward, varified my id online with provisional licence never got a call or anything just a journal message when I'm being paid. Still waiting for my pay day so can't speak to that but so far it's been just fill in forms. No calls or anything thank god
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @BOB I worried myself sick about doing my migration to UC, the worry definitely made my mental health worse. I was devastated when the letter came.
       Eventually i thought I can't keep worrying about it and decided to get it out of the way , and to be honest, maybe I was lucky but it couldn't have any better, was easy and no problems at all...   No fit notes needed, no reassessment needed.   I signed claimant commitments online, no need to do anything.  I did have to go in to show id but that was fine, I could have had somebody come to me but the wait was really long.
        I'm expecting my first payment on 13 Feb, fingers crossed it goes well, but seems everything should.
       I worried myself sick for nothing although I'm the worst for worrying, but I do wish I listened more to some people on here saying it would be ok.   
       I could have just been lucky though as I was only getting the lcwra element along with the basic amount. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I think, God forbid, they're going to abolish LCWRA for the future claimants and push the current ones into work. But the trouble is that if they keep reassessing the current claimants on LCWRA, then these might lose their current award and become no different from new claimants.

    The Tories were much favourable on this issue, as they said that:

    * No one in the LCWRA group will face benefit sanctions and all support offered will be voluntary.

    * Most existing claimants on health benefits will not need to be re-assessed with a new Work Capability Assessment. Re-assessments will only take place under limited circumstances, which are:

    * When a claimant reports a change of circumstances in their health condition.

    * If a claimant has been awarded LCWRA for pregnancy risk, or cancer treatment where the prognosis for recovery is expected to be short-term.

    *In cases of suspected fraud.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Scorpion Yeah the Tories at least tried to protect existing claimants, I cant see Labour doing that.
      The Tories motive as always was saving money for lower taxation, however there always seemed to be lingering sympathy for sick people.
      Labours motive seems to be an actual ideology against sick people as was the case when they introduced ESA, which by design reassessed people every 3 months and was supposed to kick a million sick people of benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Rik I didn't but I was very close to voting Conservative on the fact they were going to do that.  If Labour do no adhere to it then they are dicing with my vote.

      I will also attempt a small something from home as well if I know they are not going steal my £400

      Others need to remember the Conservatives said this and it should be the first thing they announce. Then get on with their BS!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion They might keep to this to shut us all up and just impose their misery on generations of new claimants.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion What I’ve said; the Conservatives were the lesser of two evils. Few believed me!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    A good indicator of where the government are likely to go is to read the Health Foundation report by Professor Paul Gregg (who is chair of the board advising the government on this):

    Some of his suggestions:

    -During the first 2 years of a claim, a claimant most be more active in looking for or preparing for work and won't take a WCA test until the 2 years are up. Other countries do similar things. Rates would be above standard rates but below LCWRA rates. People would continue to claim some of this if they find employment for a set period.

    -Abolishing the LCWRA element and increasing the generosity of PIP. Making PIP taxable and increasing the long term health prognosis for elligibility from 1 to 2 years. "Grandfathering" everyone currently on LCWRA so they will keep getting it but making new claimants ineligible. Possibly adding a third lower element to PIP for those not able to work.

    -Stresses that engagement with Employment services must be voluntary and is scathing of sanctions. I suspect the government will introduce a "duty to engage" ie a meeting once a year to discuss how they might help if you want it

    The likes of The Times won't report the nuances of all this- just the sensationalist headline grabbing  stuff  lacking context to titillate Fraser Nelson and co

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Eloise This seems at least a little thought out, and less radical, I will try to google for this report if I can, please post a link if you have it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Sevenbees Yes USA economy creates jobs but provision for benefits is very patchy and is different from state to state and did you know if you are unemployed there you have to sell your possesions
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Bert @Bert disabled people in US can get up to $3600 per month while average payment is about $1400 per month equivalent to the amount received by those on ESA support group.
      PLUS USA economy creats jobs not like sluggish UK economy which creats less and less jobs so it is unfair to compare.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Eloise I am getting LCWRA but not PIP. Haven't applied for PIP can't stand the thought of the stress.   I get by just.

      If things do start getting linked to PIP I will make a claim and I am sureI am not the only one thinking like this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Scorpion You didn't mention America the richest country in the world with very limited welfare provision.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.