UC rates

The Bill provides for above inflation increases in the standard rate of UC, from 2.3% above inflation in 2026/27 to 4.8% above inflation in 2029/30.

However, the LCWRA rate will be frozen from 2026/27 to 2029/30.

The LCWRA element rates for the 2026/27 tax year will be:

  • pre-2026 claimant  £423.27
  • severe conditions criteria claimant  £423.27
  • claimant who is terminally ill  £423.27
  • any other claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity £217.26
Severe conditions criteria - no private doctor diagnoses allowed.

The Bill provides that claimants who meet the severe conditions criteria for UC will never have to have another reassessment and will be paid the higher rate of UC health element of £97 per week.

The criteria are essentially the descriptors for being found to have LCWRA for UC - we cover this in more detail in "How the severe conditions criteria work" on this page - with four further requirement:

  • The individual’s level of function will always meet LCWRA
  • The individual’s condition will last for the rest of their life
  • There is no realistic prospect of recovery of function, and
  • The condition has been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified healthcare professional in the course of the provision of NHS services.

That last bullet appears to mean that an adult living in an area where they will have to wait literally years for an NHS assessment of say ADHD or autism will not be able to pay for a private assessment and have that accepted for the purpose of getting the higher rate of UC health element.


"one of the most generous ever"

The DWP press release boasts that:

"The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will provide 13-weeks of additional financial security to existing claimants affected by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who their lose eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer’s element of Universal Credit.

"The 13-week additional protection will give people who will be affected by the changes time to adapt, access new, tailored employment support, and plan for their future once they are reassessed and their entitlement ends.

"This transitional cover is one of the most generous ever and more than three times the length of protection provided for the transition from DLA to PIP."


Press release from the DWP

The DWP have issued  a press release headed "Welfare bill will protect the most vulnerable and help households with income boost".  It quotes Liz Kendall as saying:

"This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.

"This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change."


PIP changes in the Bill

The 4-point rule and the 13 week run-on if you lose your PIP because of it are confirmed.  Plus a clause which could be used to allow for pension age PIP claimants to be exempt from the 4-point rule

Clause 5 deals with PIP.  

Subsection 1 confirms the requirement to:

score at least 8 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the standard rate;

score at least 12 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the enhanced rate.

In other words, the 4-point rule.

Paragraph 6 (c) confirms that PIP will be payable for 13 weeks after a decision that you are no longer entitled to PIP daily living component as a result of failing the 4-point rule.

Subsection 2 says that the secretary of state (SoS) will decide the date on which the new rules begin.  The explanatory notes add that this is intended to be November 2026.  The change will not apply to any given claimant until their award is reassessed.  So for claimants with longer awards it may be some years distant - by which time there may be an entirely new PIP test.

Subsection 4 appears to be a "get-out clause" to allow the SoS to make special provisions for particular groups of people.  They almost certainly have pension age PIP claimants in mind here.  The paragraph actually says:

"to make different provision for different cases or purposes (including different provision for persons of different ages);"

So, for example, it might allow the SoS to decide that the 4-point rule will never apply to any person at or over pension age, who is already in receipt of PIP daily living in November 2026.   This would give pension age claimants an exemption, but it's interesting that this is not being put into the Act itself.

The subsection also allows the secretary of state to provide for "a person to exercise discretion in dealing with any matter".  

 

Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill published

The bill has now been published.  You can download the 22 page .pdf document from the Get file link on this page.

Or you can download the file directly from this link

You can download the explanatory notes from this page

There's also an impact assessment on the Universal Credit Rebalancing from the Department for Work and Pensions - May 2025


Money Bill

There has been discussion about whether Labour will seek to have this bill designated as a money bill, which would effectively remove House of Lords scrutiny.  A decision about whether a bill is a money bill is made by the Speaker of the House, after the report stage.  However, according to guidance on Money Bills from the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel: 

1.35 During the debates in 1911 it was alleged to be a defect in the bill that the Speaker was not required to make his decision earlier because of the risk of the Commons proceedings being completed in ignorance of whether the bill was to be certified. There is now an informal indication, published as a note when the Bill is listed on the Commons Order Paper, as to whether a bill is likely to be certified as a money bill.

The notice that the bill will be presented today on the Order Paper makes no mention of a money bill, so this seems to be an indication - though not a certainty - that Labour are not pursuing this possibility.


Bill due this afternoon

The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to be published this afternoon.  This is the bill that will enable the introduction of the PIP 4-point rule and cuts to universal credit for disabled claimants.

We’ll provides links, analysis and the opportunity for you to comment on this page.

According to the UK parliament website, it is a:  "Bill to make provision to alter the rates of the standard allowance, limited capability for work element and limited capability for work and work-related activity element of universal credit and the rates of income-related employment and support allowance, and to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment."

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 39 minutes ago
    Is there a summary of what has happened today, in layman's terms in relation to what was proposed previously and how much of that was even discussed today? 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 46 minutes ago
    Question:

    What if you already have an pre existing autism and/or adhd diagnosis but it wasn’t someone from the nhs who gave that diagnosis (so private or otherwise - I think some charities offer assessment for diagnosis) does this new delightful ruling apply to you or is it for new diagnosis only

    (I’ve been diagnosed for almost 30 years but I’m not 100% sure the assessor was nhs employed as I was a child at the time I got diagnosed as autistic)


    We knew they were going to try and limit adhd and autistic claimants down the line but not this soon and this is a nasty way to do it (it may of been fair for different classes but the nhs waiting time for diagnosis can be 10 years now and that’s if Kendall doesn’t ask streeting to redirect the money to carry out diagnosis away to another area as a favour between ‘fictional villains’
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 57 minutes ago
    So if I am reading right they will put up standard UC rate but freeze LCW rate.  So people fit for work will get more!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Don’t we have protections as disabled people against discrimination which could protect us from being attacked by the government?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 31 minutes ago
      @Ginny Yes under the equality act 2010 as it’s listed as one of the six characteristics. Disability and ageism are 2 of them
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 41 minutes ago
      @Ginny We should have. Surely they are putting disabled people in harms way.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    I’m 71, I have worked and contributed for 46 years, but now, they’re moving the goalposts yet again! I don’t mind working but now I can’t and I need the help I was promised when I first started back in 1976! It’s not like we don’t deserve it but why are we targeted? Multinationals pay taxes on profits made worldwide so while McDonalds , for example, made £35 millions profit in 2023, they only paid £700k in taxes because their Turkey branches made a loss!!! So we’re paying for McD expansion program but our gov can’t help us!? That’s just one multinational, they’re dozens operating in the UK and paying minimal taxes. When I ran my business, it was 40% tax on profits made worldwide, every year for 40 years!! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    I'm still confused after reading the bill what will happen to those of us who are currently on ongoing light touch 10 year reviews (mine is in 2034) who currently are on enhanced PIP (Score of 13) but with no 4 points in one single question? It's such a beast of a bill to decode and understand - even the explanatory notes are tricky to understand. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    The government gave assurances that those with severe lifelong disability would be protected on the face of the bill, and that they would not be reassessed. Yet the bill leaves unanswered questions. So fails to protect those with lifelong severe disability as currently defined by WCA LCWRA severely disabled sub group do not reassess, or PIP working age enhanced daily living award ongoing no end date not reassessed just light touch reviewed.

    What happens to someone in the WCA severe group in 2028 when WCA ceases to dermine eligibility to UC health. If they are not eligible for PIP daily living component, or only have a PIP standard rate PIP award, or a fixed end date PIP award.

    When the WCA is abolished how is the severe group for UC determined by PIP assessment/award. And how is it determined for those with ongoing PIP awards that are not reassessed. What if someone who has a ongoing PIP award but has not claimed UC, claims UC, how is their eligibility for the severe group determined after the WCA is abolished without reasessing them for PIP?

    What conditionality and sanctions regime if any will apply to the severe group.

    The government has also repeatedly stated in written answers to parliamentary questions, and to the media that pensioners and working age claimants with ongoing/indefinite awards with light touch reviews every 10 years will not be affected by the 4pt rule. At least if they have no change of circumstances. And has also said it was looking into what to do if they had a change of circumstances. But no such guarantee is in the bill. The bill just says in regard to all existing PIP awards "Until the next occasion on which it is determined whether C continues to have limited ability or severely limited ability to carry out daily living activities"
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    This bill is to cut pip, cut LCWRA and tighten the eligibility for PIP.

    This has nothing to do with the Green Paper/Consultation.

    The Green Paper is going to be another thing for us to fight because they want to abolish the Work Capability Assessment and in turn Limited Capability for Work and Limited Capability for Work Related Activity.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 29 minutes ago
      @Dave Dee Some of that was in the green paper.  But I'm surprised at no mention of scrapping WCA.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    I work as a benefits advisor I am horrified at the repercussions of these reforms. We have been telling successive governments that the benefit system is not fit for purpose and needs radical reform, as it is not transparent, consistent, fair or user-friendly. It is only now that the government wants to save millions of pounds that it is willing to tinker with it.
    Considering that the push is to get more people back in to the workplace, I have clients whose PIP payments enable them to reduce their working hours and hang on at work. The loss of PIP will force them to give up working altogether. 
    Those whose access to Carers Allowance will be removed will likewise have to choose between working more hours and leaving their loved ones at the mercy of a broken care system or sacrificing income to be at home more. 
    I have many clients who have been receiving enhanced PIP for several years but who will fail to score the necessary 4 points on a single descriptor,
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 41 minutes ago
      @Magbot I think the government will save £12 billion with the cuts but it will then have a knock on affect on social care and the NHS.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 43 minutes ago
      @Magbot  Magbot, I hope you can write to your MP and mention your experience as an advisor, if you haven’t already. The govt don’t seem to be listening to anyone at all, but we have to keep trying
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Well for sure these cuts to PIP will as we know have a knock on effect as regards carers allowance and many full time unpaid carers will lose not only the allowance but the status of carer which is of course a gateway to other help and of course they will have to look for work if working age.

    What we are going to see is both the NHS and social care having to deal with the fallout from these savage welfare cuts and a outright attack on the sick and disabled and those who care for them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Does the actual publication give any clearer indication of money bill or not?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Slb I think the Speaker decides after the third reading in the Commons before it goes to the Lords if the bill is purely Commons financial privilege, and so purely a money bill. As ammendments made in the Commons could change the contents of the bills. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    We are the only Minority that "Anyone" can join in less than a minute (I joined in that time), and I can pretty much guarantee that these same MPs would be yelling from the rooftops about this treatment if they joined our Minority. They don't care about us because the "Minister for Disability" is NOT disabled, has no idea the daily struggles we go through, and, to be honest, I don't think Mr Stephen Timms cares at all. The "Minister for Disability" should be one of the thirteen MPs who are Disabled. Then we would have an actual voice in Parliament.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    When will the changes kick in if they get voted through?  I haven’t worked for 3 years because of long covid. It’s ruined me but I only got 2s on daily living but get higher ratw and am in lwcra. My pip review is July 2026. I’m really scared about this. I barely get by as it is. Horrible situation. I’d love to be able to work. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Jonny I think you might be ok on your next review as changes are planned to start after Nov ‘26. But we’re fighting to overturn this  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Sorry for my ignorance but is this all final? 
    Is it now set to happen no matter what? 
    Is there no one standing against this in parliament be they Labour or any other party?
    Is it not against human rights act to discriminate against disabled, mentally ill or chronically ill people? 
    What is the consensus of the general public who don't rely of UC and PIP for a disability?  

    I am currently in a mental health crisis, I have Bipolar, psychosis, paranoia, neurotic OCD and extreme anxiety. I have the crisis team visiting me daily and seeing my psychiatrist weekly due to attempting to take my own life due to all the these cuts, I don't see anyway forward and feel that suicide is the only option as I will become homeless or be sectioned due to these cuts. Even the crisis team have said that they believe the cuts are inevitable and we need to face these facts. 

    Is there any hope? Is there any chance these cuts won't happen?  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 35 minutes ago
      @Yorkie Bard I agree, there are so many people that keep fighting. People care about you, Kevin. As Yorkie Bard said, try to take a day at a time. I know that’s harder said than done. I truly believe things are not going to turn out as bad as they seem over these proposals. There is hope at the moment.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @kevin Kevin - an awful lot of the people on here know a great deal more about the subject than your crisis team!

      The majority of posts are positive and as Gingin told you, there is hope. You may not feel like you have any fight in you right now - but a lot of us have & we are fighting your corner for you.

      Please, just try to take one day at a time. My view is that the publication of the bill today will anger even more labour MPs!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Slb SLB - if I were a gambling man I would open a book

      Money bill   100/1 (rank outsider)
      Normal bill  2/1    (odds on favourite)
       
      PS -  used to be but not for a lot of years! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @kevin Yes there’s hope. Don’t listen to the crisis team. It isn’t over til it’s over. We’re fighting against it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @kevin I think, in all honesty, that depends if this goes through as a money bill.  I think the feeling is it won't, but if it does then my gut feeling is that it going to get through.

      BUT... if this goes through as a normal bill, it has a much longer process that presumably won't finish until the autumn, giving us more time and therefore more chance of us winning, and also more opportunities for amendments etc. We think this is a normal bill, but it won't be confirmed for a little while.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Am I missing something or does it not mention making pip the gateway benefit to lcwra?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    The govt is relying on one thing here: the fact that we are, along with immigrants, despised by the working poor. Much as I understand some level of resentment, they had best hope they don’t become ill. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Share with MP's, councils etc:

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    It is distressing that each time politicians feel the pinch, they head for benefits and immigration to make cuts.
    They make you feel so bad. An article for political ping pong. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    The person I cared for died. I have funeral expenses to pay as well as utility and other bills. If her  private pension is paid into my account I will lose Universal credit by the equivalent amount of the pension ( just a few days worth)  so the only way to pay is to get into debt as her account was closed when she died. I need  Pip to pay the utilities but im terrified of using too much water. I need medicines and aids not on the NHS so I have to pay. Trying to cut down on food but Im sensitive and react badly if I eat wheat so cheap staples aren't good... currently wondering what will happen to me. There's no jobs locally that I can do
    .
     

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact