- Posts: 10
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP, UC and DLA Queries and Results
- help needed to understand upper tribunal letter
help needed to understand upper tribunal letter
- Lisa
- Topic Author
- Offline
many thanks........


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
Lisa wrote: had high rate care reduced to nothing and mobility stay at low rate... we appealed and lost the reconsideration appeal ... we then appealed to the tribunal which we won and low care re introduced..... which we were happy with ... on receiving the tribunal letter that we believed they made an error in law which they took points away and gave points elsewhere which meant i could get high rate mobility .... so we appealed to the upper tribunal which was accepted by the judge..... we have just received the upper tribunals letter and the secretary of state has confirmed the lower tribunal had erred in law and has asked the upper tribunal judge to make his decision without reason..... we have signed the form 3a to confirm we are happy with this.... my question is does the upper tribunal judge always agree with the decision of the secretary of state or could he overturn it without reason ( so agreeing with the lower tribunal)
many thanks........![]()
The UTT Judge will make their own Decision, but if the DWP are saying that an Error occurred then it is likely that this is what the Judge will find as well.
The most likely result is that the original Tribunal decision will be Set Aside and a new FTT hearing will be ordered.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Lisa
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 10
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Lisa
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 10
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
The UTT Judge can make a Decision that includes your entitlement to a PIP award, but it would be very unusual for them to so and you should not rely on it happening. By far and away the most likely result is a Decision confirming that an Error has occurred, ordering a new First Tier Tribunal with a direction on how to avoid the Error.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cdcdi1911
- Offline
- Posts: 2522
If the judge agrees that there has been an error of law and allows the appeal, he then has to decide how to dispose of the appeal.
The only circumstances where he can substitute the decision for that of his own, is where no further evidence is necessary and the appeal papers contain all the evidence required to make a decision.
It does often happen, but the vast majority of upper tribunal appeals allowed, involve errors or law that result in inadequate facts or the wrong facts being obtained by the tribunal, and further evidence/questioning is required.
The first-tier tribunal are the fact finding body that contain the panel members that the law requires for obtaining evidence (the UT is purely legal and have no doctors sitting), so in these instances the appeal has to be remitted back to the FTT.
Best of luck,
Derek
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.