- Posts: 2022
 			× 			Members		
 	 	esa
- rave
- Topic Author
 			 	 						14 years 3 months ago				#61192 		by rave 	  	 		 			 	    			 			 		 													
 	 				esa was created by rave			
  			 				can anyone help,i recently passed the work capability assessment on the 17/03/2011.they sent me a letter to say i no longer need to provide further medical evidence from my doctor.but june just gone they have sent me the form esa50 2 fill out, and they said i may have to have a assessment at atos healfcare(AGAIN)is this right so soon after passing the last wca.			
  					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Crazydiamond
- Offline
 		Less 		More 		 			 	
 		 			 	 						14 years 3 months ago		 -  14 years 3 months ago		#61197 		by Crazydiamond 	  	 		 			 					
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems 					 	   	 			 		 													
 	 				Replied by Crazydiamond on topic Re:esa			
  			 				I'm afraid you can be called for a further WCA at any time, even though it is only six months since you were last subjected to the WCA.
 
It is likely that the approved disability analyst may have suggested that a return to work could be considered in six months, hence the issue of another ESA50.
  							It is likely that the approved disability analyst may have suggested that a return to work could be considered in six months, hence the issue of another ESA50.
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
 		Last edit: 14 years 3 months ago  by Crazydiamond.		Reason: Grammar correction.	
  			Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rave
- Topic Author
 			 	 						14 years 3 months ago				#61200 		by rave 	  	 		 			 	    			 			 		 													
 	 				Replied by rave on topic Re:esa			
  			 				hi,thanks for info,so its poss i could go on one every month if they like,ps it was only 4 months that i passed it,(maybe they will keep doing it till i dont pass,)thanks			
  					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cdcdi1911
- Offline
 		Less 		More 		 			 	
 		- Posts: 2522
 			 	 						14 years 3 months ago				#61202 		by cdcdi1911 	  	 		 			 	    			 			 		 													
 	 				Replied by cdcdi1911 on topic Re:esa			
  			 				rave wrote: 
 
The law allows the Secretary of State to reassess claimants at a time of his choosing, so technically the answer to your question is yes!
 
Mathematically speaking, if you have a 50% chance of of passing the WCA, your chances of passing 2 tests are reduced to 25%. Your chances of passing 6 are reduced to 1.56%. A 90% chance of passing would reduce to 53.14% after 6 tests.
 
I'm not for a moment suggesting that this is the DWP's plan but clearly repetitive testing effectively reduces the number of claimants who qualify for ESA. Whilst at the same time it drastically increases the number of appeals in the system at huge cost to the taxpayer.
 
That said, DWP decision makers have an obligation to follow their guidance and should reassess you at your review date. I far as I am aware, this is either 3, 6, 12, 24 months or longer. I don't know of anybody who has been reassessed within less than 3 months so I'm afraid you have been given a harsh review date.
 
Good luck
 
Derek
  					Hi Ravehi,thanks for info,so its poss i could go on one every month if they like,ps it was only 4 months that i passed it,(maybe they will keep doing it till i dont pass,)thanks
The law allows the Secretary of State to reassess claimants at a time of his choosing, so technically the answer to your question is yes!
Mathematically speaking, if you have a 50% chance of of passing the WCA, your chances of passing 2 tests are reduced to 25%. Your chances of passing 6 are reduced to 1.56%. A 90% chance of passing would reduce to 53.14% after 6 tests.
I'm not for a moment suggesting that this is the DWP's plan but clearly repetitive testing effectively reduces the number of claimants who qualify for ESA. Whilst at the same time it drastically increases the number of appeals in the system at huge cost to the taxpayer.
That said, DWP decision makers have an obligation to follow their guidance and should reassess you at your review date. I far as I am aware, this is either 3, 6, 12, 24 months or longer. I don't know of anybody who has been reassessed within less than 3 months so I'm afraid you have been given a harsh review date.
Good luck
Derek
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DRAGON2009
- Offline
 		Less 		More 		 			 	
 		- Posts: 654
 			 	 						14 years 3 months ago				#61207 		by DRAGON2009 	  	 		 			 	    			 			 		 													
 	 				Replied by DRAGON2009 on topic Re:esa			
  			 				It is  always  important to read the medical  report and see  the prognosis advice.    If  the advice is nonsense,  for example, it is obvious  there is no  therapy in place or planned  that  could change your  situation, and the cvhances of spontaneous or progressive  recovery  (without treatment )  is  slim,  then the  claimant  ought to go to their MP  and complain,  that without proper  reason they are being harassed by the assessment process
 
Whilst a certain amount of medical judgement and discretion is allowed to the HCP's they do have to follow set down protocols.
 
The danger is that repeat medicals in a short time ( every few months) builds up a body of evidence and if conducted by several different HCP's over time, may carry a lot of weight at a later appeal tribunal.
 
The other (helpful to welfare reform) consequence, is that it deters peopl;e staying on benefits . That is of course wrong but it is a consequence for rather a lot of people
  					Whilst a certain amount of medical judgement and discretion is allowed to the HCP's they do have to follow set down protocols.
The danger is that repeat medicals in a short time ( every few months) builds up a body of evidence and if conducted by several different HCP's over time, may carry a lot of weight at a later appeal tribunal.
The other (helpful to welfare reform) consequence, is that it deters peopl;e staying on benefits . That is of course wrong but it is a consequence for rather a lot of people
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- originaldave
 			 	 						14 years 3 months ago				#61209 		by originaldave 	  	 		 			 	    			 			 		 													
 	 				Replied by originaldave on topic Re:esa			
  			 				Derek4 wrote: 
 
your sums are wrong he has as much chance of passing as last time ..the more often you are tested does not affect the maths there are two results from taking a test pass or fail
its like the lottery buy one ticket chances of winning 14,000,000 to one buy another 14,000,000 to one
 
 
  now did I get the esa and lottery mixed up and its a 14,000,000 to 1 chance of passing the esa and 50/50 the lottery
  now did I get the esa and lottery mixed up and its a 14,000,000 to 1 chance of passing the esa and 50/50 the lottery   
			
  					rave wrote:
Hi Ravehi,thanks for info,so its poss i could go on one every month if they like,ps it was only 4 months that i passed it,(maybe they will keep doing it till i dont pass,)thanks
The law allows the Secretary of State to reassess claimants at a time of his choosing, so technically the answer to your question is yes!
Mathematically speaking, if you have a 50% chance of of passing the WCA, your chances of passing 2 tests are reduced to 25%. Your chances of passing 6 are reduced to 1.56%. A 90% chance of passing would reduce to 53.14% after 6 tests.
I'm not for a moment suggesting that this is the DWP's plan but clearly repetitive testing effectively reduces the number of claimants who qualify for ESA. Whilst at the same time it drastically increases the number of appeals in the system at huge cost to the taxpayer.
That said, DWP decision makers have an obligation to follow their guidance and should reassess you at your review date. I far as I am aware, this is either 3, 6, 12, 24 months or longer. I don't know of anybody who has been reassessed within less than 3 months so I'm afraid you have been given a harsh review date.
Good luck
Derek
your sums are wrong he has as much chance of passing as last time ..the more often you are tested does not affect the maths there are two results from taking a test pass or fail
its like the lottery buy one ticket chances of winning 14,000,000 to one buy another 14,000,000 to one
 now did I get the esa and lottery mixed up and its a 14,000,000 to 1 chance of passing the esa and 50/50 the lottery
  now did I get the esa and lottery mixed up and its a 14,000,000 to 1 chance of passing the esa and 50/50 the lottery   
			Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
 		Moderators: Gordon, latetrain, BIS, Catherine, Chris, David, Keely	
  
              
             