It was one of Professor Malcolm Harrington's recommendations in his report on the WCA and it looks like it's only just been implemented.
It seems Prof Harrington's solution to the quality of computer generated medical reports is to ask the ADA to write a summary in their own words justifying their recommendation. The problem is that they are justifying something that usually doesn't make any sense!
On the positive side it could make the ADA pay more attention to the accuracy of the report but I think it's likely that the ADA's summary will be just as meaningless as the rest of the report!
Regards
Derek
Thanks Derek,
Yes, I note at para 4, on the linked doc, that it says that no new evidence should be added on the ESA85S PSS, with respect to what is already on the ESA85
I suppose we will have to wait until a member gets to see "their very own PSS".
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.
