- Posts: 7
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP, UC and DLA Queries and Results
- Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions
× Members
Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions
- lorraine
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #84577 by lorraine
Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions was created by lorraine
My first post so I hope you will be patient with me. I appealed against a decision that was made at an hearing on 31st January 2011. The appeal papers have only recently been sent to the Upper Tribunal Judge, some 15th months since the initial decision. Before the Judge decides whether to set aside the decision he wants to know what answer I would have given at that hearing if a panel member had verbally stated an observation at that hearing which may be contrary to what was provided in DLA documents. I feel this is a hypothetical question because who knows what I would have said. Is the Judge trying to catch me out? Your assistance would be much appreciated.
Last edit: 13 years 4 months ago by Gordon.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51284
13 years 4 months ago #84585 by Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic Re:Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions
lorraine
Matters relating to the Upper Tribunal are outside the remit for the forum to answer, I'm assuming you are doing this on your own, so are unable to seek advice from a trained advisor.
What I can say is that the jusge is not trying to catch you out, they obviously believe your answers are important to their making a Decision, so you should answer them as honestly as possible.
Gordon
Matters relating to the Upper Tribunal are outside the remit for the forum to answer, I'm assuming you are doing this on your own, so are unable to seek advice from a trained advisor.
What I can say is that the jusge is not trying to catch you out, they obviously believe your answers are important to their making a Decision, so you should answer them as honestly as possible.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
- lorraine
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 7
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #84593 by lorraine
Replied by lorraine on topic Re:Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions
Hi Gordon
Yes I am doing this myself and I appreciate your honesty. I just thought that the Judge's question was unusual in that how would one know what they would have replied 15 months ago.
Lorraine
Yes I am doing this myself and I appreciate your honesty. I just thought that the Judge's question was unusual in that how would one know what they would have replied 15 months ago.
Lorraine
Last edit: 13 years 4 months ago by slugsta.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51284
13 years 4 months ago #84606 by Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic Re:Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions
lorraine wrote:
It is important that you answer questions in that context, as they cannot consider your condition as it is now.
Gordon
It is important that you realise that all Tribunals, including the Upper Tribunal will be reviewing your condition as it was at the time of the Decision you appealed (e.g. 15 months ago).Hi Gordon
Yes I am doing this myself and I appreciate your honesty. I just thought that the Judge's question was unusual in that how would one know what they would have replied 15 months ago.
Lorraine
It is important that you answer questions in that context, as they cannot consider your condition as it is now.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
- lorraine
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 7
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #84609 by lorraine
Replied by lorraine on topic Re:Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions
The Tribunal Hearing in January 2011 was in relation to a DLA form that was submitted in April 2008 so I was flabergasted to read that my condition was being assessed at a hearing nearly 3 years later and the two dates being compared. I thought assessing individuals at hearings was not the remit of the panel that is why medical evidence is presented?
Last edit: 13 years 4 months ago by slugsta.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51284
13 years 4 months ago #84614 by Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic Re:Setting Aside a DLA Decision and Judge's Questions
lorraine wrote:
The Upper Tribunal does not review the evidence in terms of its content, but in the sense of whether the original Tribunal panel discharged their role appropriately. So the Upper Tribunal cannot find in your favour because it believes the evidence you submitted, shows you meet the criteria for the benefit when the Lower Tribunal did not. But can find for you if it believed that the Lower Tribunal did not review that evidence with due diligence.
In finding for you, the most likely result is that a new Lower Tribunal will be ordered to re-hear your case.
Gordon
The Lower Tribunal re-makes the Decision that is being appealed, this means they review all evidence and the testimony of the claimant at the hearing to make that new Decision.The Tribunal Hearing in January 2011 was in relation to a DLA form that was submitted in April 2008 so I was flabergasted to read that my condition was being assessed at a hearing nearly 3 years later and the two dates being compared. I thought assessing individuals at hearings was not the remit of the panel that is why medical evidence is presented?
The Upper Tribunal does not review the evidence in terms of its content, but in the sense of whether the original Tribunal panel discharged their role appropriately. So the Upper Tribunal cannot find in your favour because it believes the evidence you submitted, shows you meet the criteria for the benefit when the Lower Tribunal did not. But can find for you if it believed that the Lower Tribunal did not review that evidence with due diligence.
In finding for you, the most likely result is that a new Lower Tribunal will be ordered to re-hear your case.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Moderators: Gordon, latetrain, BIS, Catherine, Chris, David, Angel